Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Depo operatörü lojistik firmasının seçimi için bulanık VIKOR ve bulanık TOPSIS yöntemlerinin uygulanması

Application of fuzzy VIKOR and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for warehouse logistics operator selection

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2013

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In today’s competitive environment, the importance of warehousing within logistics has been growing. The role of working with the right warehouse operator firm in achieving the enterprises' goals is getting more important. Analysis of outsourcing warehouse activities or third party warehousing reveal that contract warehousing costs are significantly lower than stand-alone warehousing. The aim of this study is to propose a multi-criteria decision making model to evaluate the third party logistics provider options as a warehouse operator. Relatively new method, called VIKOR (VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje in Serbian, means Multi-criteria Optimization and Compromise Solution) is used in the evaluation procedure supported by fuzzy logic approach. Additionally, a real case study in food sector is presented to illustrate the application of the suggested approach. Obtained results were compared with fuzzy TOPSIS method which is a widely used approach for multi-criteria decision making problems.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Günümüzün rekabet ortamında, lojistik faaliyetler içerisinde depolamanın önemi gittikçe artmaktadır. İşletmenin hedeflerine uygun depo operatörü firmanın seçimi, rekabette büyük rol oynamaktadır. Depolama faaliyetlerinde dış kaynak kullanımı analiz edildiğinde, uygulamanın önemli derecede maliyet avantajı sağladığı ortaya çıkmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, depo operatörü olarak görev alacak üçüncü parti lojistik servis sağlayıcı alternatiflerinin değerlendirilmesi için, çok kriterli karar verme modeli oluşturmaktır. Değerlendirme şablonun oluşturulmasında, bulanık mantık yaklaşımı ile VIKOR metodu birlikte kullanılmıştır. VIKOR, Sırp dilinde çok kriterli optimizasyon ve uzlaşık çözüm anlamına gelen, göreceli yeni bir metottur. Ayrıca, oluşturulan yaklaşımın gıda sektöründe uygulanmasına yönelik bir örnek sunulmuştur. Elde edilen sonuçlar, yaygın kullanılan bir yöntem olan bulanık TOPSIS metodunun sonuçları ile karşılaştırılmıştır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-depo-operatoru-lojistik-firmasinin-secimi-icin-bulanik-vikor-bulanik-topsis-yontemlerinin-uygulanmasi.pdf
  • 2
198
218
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

[1] C. R. Moberg, T. W. Speh, Third-Party Warehousing Selection: A Comparison of National and Regional Firms. Mid-American Journal of Business, 19, 2, 71-76 (2004).
[2] A. Aguezzoul, “The Third Party Logistics Selection: A Review of Literature”, Proceedings of Int. Logistics and Supply Chain Congress’2007 (CD), İstanbul, Türkiye, 1-7 (2007).
[3] A. B. Maltz, The Relative Importance of Cost and Quality in the Outsourcing of Warehousing. Journal of Business Logistics, 15, 2, 45-62 (1994).
[4] J. A. Tompkins, J. D. Smith, The Warehouse Management Handbook, Tompkins Publications, USA, 1998.
[5] E. Frazelle, World-Class Warehousing and Material Handling, Mc-Graw Hill, USA, 2002.
[6] A. Brewer, K. J. Button, D. A. Hensher, Handbook of Logistics and Supply-Chain Management, Pergamon-Elsevier Ltd., Oxford, UK, 2001.
[7] P. Obal, Selecting Warehouse Software from WMS and ERP Providers, IDII, USA, 2004.
[8] D. F. Ross, Distribution Planning and Control: Managing in the Era of Supply Chain Management, Second Edition, Kluwer Academic Publishers, USA, 2004.
[9] A. B. Maltz, Outsourcing the Warehousing Function: Economic and Strategic Considerations. Logistics and Transportation Review, 30, 3, 245-265 (1994).
[10] J. Korpela, A. Lehmusvaara, A Customer Oriented Approach To Warehouse Network Evaluation and Design. International Journal of Production Economics, 59, 1-3, 135-146 (1999).
A. Görener/ İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi 42, 2, (2013) 198-218 © 2013
214
[11] G. Colson, F. Dorigo, A Public Warehouses Selection Support System. European Journal of Operational Research, 153, 332-349 (2004).
[12] J. Korpela, A. Lehmusvaara, J. Nisonen, Warehouse Operator Selection By Combining AHP and DEA Methodologies. International Journal of Production Economics, 108, 135-142 (2007).
[13] A. Jarzemskis, Determination and Evaluation of The Factors of Outsourcing Logistics. Transport, 21, 1, 44-47 (2006).
[14] E. Melachrinoudis, H. Min, Redesigning a Warehouse Network. European Journal of Operational Research, 176, 210-229 (2007).
[15] W. Ho, A. Emrouznejad, Multi-Criteria Logistics Distribution Network Design Using SAS/OR. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 7288-7298 (2009).
[16] M. Amiri, S. A. Ayazi, L. Olfat, J. S. Moradi, Group Decision Making Process for Supplier Selection with VIKOR under Fuzzy Circumstance. International Bulletin of Business Administration, 10, 62-75 (2011).
[17] S. Opricovic, G. H. Tzeng, Compromise Solution by MCDM Methods: A Comparative Analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156, 2, 445-455 (2004).
[18] M. T. Chu, J. Shyu, G. H. Tzeng, R. Khosla, Comparison Among Three Analytical Methods for Knowledge Communities Group Decision Analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 33, 4, 1011-1024 (2007).
[19] S. Opricovic, G. H. Tzeng, Extended VIKOR Method in Comparison with Other Outranking Methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 178, 2, 514-529 (2007).
[20] G. H. Tzeng, C. W. Lin, S. Opricovic, Multi-Criteria Analysis of Alternative-Fuel Buses for Public Transportation. Energy Policy, 33, 1373-1383 (2005).
[21] C. Yang, T. Wang, VIKOR Method Analysis of Interactive Trade in Policy-Making. The Business Review, 6, 2, 77-85 (2006).
[22] D. Lixin, L. Ying, Z. Zhiguang, “Selection Of Logistics Service Provider Based On Analytic Network Process and VIKOR Algorithm”, Networking, Sensing and Control, ICNSC 2008-IEEE International Conference Proceedings, 1207-1210 (2008).
[23] İ. Ertuğrul, N. Karakaşoğlu, Banka Şube Performanslarının VIKOR Yöntemi İle Değerlendirilmesi. Endüstri Mühendisliği Dergisi, 20, 11, 19-28 (2009).
[24] S. Opricovic, A Compromise Solution in Water Resources Planning. Water Resources Management, 23, 1549-1561 (2009).
[25] J. J. H. Liou, Y. T. Chuang, Developing a Hybrid Multi-Criteria Model for Selection of Outsourcing Providers. Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 3755-3761 (2010).
[26] S. Datta, S. S. Mahapatra, S. Banerjee, A. Bandyopadhyay, “Comparative Study on Application of Utility Concept and VIKOR Method for Vendor Selection”, Proceedings of AIMS International Conference on Value-based Management, 614-622 (2010).
[27] M. F. El-Santawy, A VIKOR Method for Solving Personnel Training Selection Problem. International Journal Of Computing Science, 1, 2, 9-12 (2012).
[28] J. W. Lee, S. H. Kim, Using ANP and Goal Programming for Interdependent Information System Project Selection. Computers & Operations Research, 27, 4, 367-382 (2001).
A. Görener/ İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi 42, 2, (2013) 198-218 © 2013
215
[29] O. Kulak, C. Kahraman, Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Selection Among Transportation Companies Using Axiomatic Design and AHP. Information Sciences, 170, 2-4, 191-210 (2005).
[30] L. A. Zadeh, Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control, 8, (1965).
[31] G. Akman, A. Alkan, Tedarik Zinciri Yönetiminde Bulanık AHP Yöntemi Kullanılarak Tedarikçilerin Performansının Ölçülmesi: Otomotiv Yan Sanayinde Bir Uygulama. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 5, 9, 23-46 (2006).
[32] A. Öztürk, İ. Ertuğrul, N. Karakaşoğlu, Nakliye Firması Seçiminde Bulanık AHP ve Bulanık TOPSIS Yöntemlerinin Karşılaştırılması. Marmara Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 15, 2, 785-824 (2008).
[33] Ö. İnce, “Selection of an ERP Software System by Using Fuzzy VIKOR”, Information Sciences 2007-Proceedings of the 10th Joint Conference CD, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA (2007).
[34] A. Sanayei, S. F. Mousavi, A. Yazdankhah, Group Decision Making Process For Supplier Selection With VIKOR Under Fuzzy Environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 1, 24-30 (2010).
[35] H. Y. Wua, G. H. Tzeng, Y. H. Chen, A Fuzzy MCDM Approach For Evaluating Banking Performance Based On Balanced Scorecard. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 6, 10135-10147 (2009).
[36] G. Büyüközkan, G. D. Ruan, Evaluation of Software Development Projects Using a Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Approach. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 77, 464-475 (2008).
[37] L. Y. Chen, T. Wang, Optimizing Partners’ Choice in IS/IT Outsourcing Process: The Strategic Decision of Fuzzy VIKOR. International Journal of Production Economics, 120, 1, 233-242 (2009).
[38] H. Y. Wu, J. K. Chen, I. S. Chen, Innovation Capital Indicator Assessment of Taiwanese Universities: A Hybrid Fuzzy Model Application. Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 1635-1642 (2010).
[39] M. S. Kuo, G. S. Liang, Combining VIKOR with GRA Techniques to Evaluate Service Quality of Airports under Fuzzy Environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 1304-1312 (2011).
[40] T. C. Wang, J. L. Liang, C. Y. Ho, “Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis by Using Fuzzy VIKOR”, Service Systems and Service Management International Conference Proceedings, 901-906 (2006).
[41] G. N. Yücenur, N. Ç. Demirel, Group Decision Making Process For Insurance Company Selection Problem with Extended VIKOR Method Under Fuzzy Environment. Expert Systems With Applications, 39, 3, 3702-3707 (2012).
[42] G. Akyüz, Bulanık VIKOR Yöntemi ile Tedarikçi Seçimi. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 26, 1 (2012).
[43] S. J. Chen, G. H. Huang, Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making, Springer, NY, 1992.
[44] D. Viehland, Research Applications of the Delphi Method, CIS Group Research Seminar Series, 2007, tur-www1.massey.ac.nz/~hryu/Delphi%20Method.pdf, 02 Eylül 2010.
A. Görener/ İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi 42, 2, (2013) 198-218 © 2013
216
[45] F. H. Tooli, A. Omidian, M. R. Fathi, Applying Fuzzy AHP and VIKOR to Research Supervisor Selection: A Case Study. American Journal of Scientific Research, 30, 19-27 (2011).
[46] D. Yong, Plant Location Selection Based on Fuzzy TOPSIS. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies, 28, 7-8, 839- 844 (2006).
[47] E. Özgörmüş, Ö. Mutlu, H. Güner, “Bulanık AHP ile Personel Seçimi”, V. Ulusal Üretim Araştırmaları Sempozyumu Bildiriler Kitabı, İstanbul, 111-115 (2005).
[48] T. Kaya, C. Kahraman, Multicriteria Renewable Energy Planning Using an Integrated Fuzzy VIKOR & AHP Methodology: The Case Of Istanbul. Energy, 35, 2517-2527, (2010).
[49] M. Yavuz, “Fuzzy Inventory Management”, in Production Engineering and Management under Fuzziness Book, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2010, 25-38.
[50] C. T. Chen, Extensions of the TOPSIS for Group Decision-Making under Fuzzy Environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114, 1, 1-9 (2000).
[51] T. C. Chu, Facility Location Selection Using Fuzzy TOPSIS Under Group Decisions. Int. Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 10, 687-701 (2002).
[52] C. L. Hwang, K. Yoon, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Application, Springer Publications, Berlin, 1981.
[53] P. Alcan, H. Basligil, “A Facility Location Selection Problem by Fuzzy TOPSIS”, Proceedings of 15th International Research/Expert Conference ”Trends in the Development of Machinery and Associated Technology” TMT 2011, 329-332 (2011).
[54] A. Shanian, O. Savadogo, TOPSIS Multiple-Criteria Decision Support Analysis for Material Selection of Metallic Bipolar Plates for Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell. Journal of Power Sources, 159, 1095-1104 (2006).
[55] K. Shyjith, M. Ilangkumaran, S. Kumanan, Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach to Evaluate Optimum Maintenance Strategy in Textile Industry. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 14, 4, 375-386 (2008).
[56] K. Shahanaghi, S. A. Yazdian, Vendor Selection Using a New Fuzzy Group TOPSIS Approach. Journal of Uncertain Systems, 3, 3, 221-231 (2009).
[57] F. Cavallaro, Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach for Assessing Thermal-Energy Storage in Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) Systems. Applied Energy, 87, 496-503 (2010).
[58] G. Torlak, M. Sevkli, M. Sanal, S. Zaim, Analyzing Business Competition by Using Fuzzy TOPSIS Method: An Example of Turkish Domestic Airline Industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 3396-3406 (2011).
[59] S. Apak, Ö. Vayvay, O Feyzioğlu, A Decision Making Model for the Evaluation of Supply Chain Execution and Management Systems. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 6, 2, 293-306 (2013).
[60] R. K. Singh, L. Benyoucef, A Fuzzy TOPSIS Based Approach for E-Sourcing. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 24, 437-448 (2011).
[61] J. F. Ding, An Integrated Fuzzy TOPSIS Method for Ranking Alternatives and Its Application. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 19, 4, 341-352 (2011).

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com