Buradasınız

UZAKTAN ALGILAMA VERİLERİNDE SINIFLANDIRMA DOĞRULUĞUNUN BELİRLENMESİ YÖNTEMLERİ

ASSESSMENT METHODS FOR CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY IN REMOTE SENSING DATA

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
From the early 1970s up to now advanced many sensor data have been commonly used with a view to collect information and produce various thematic maps in large areas. Prospective users of maps and data derived from remotely sensed images quite naturally ask about the accuracy of the information they will use. However, questions concerning the accuracy are surprisingly difficult to reply in a convincing manner. In this paper, how accuracy assessment of a map or a classified image derived from remote sensing data according to different accuracy assessment methods was explained with a sample application.
Abstract (Original Language): 
1970'Ii yıllardan günümüze, geliştirilmiş çok sayıda algılayıcı verisi, geniş alanlara yönelik bilgi toplama ve çeşitli konusal haritaların üretilmesinde yaygın bir şekilde kullanılmaktadır. Uzaktan algılanmış görüntülerden elde edilen veri ve haritaların kullanıcıları, doğal olarak kullanacakları bilginin doğruluğunu sorgular. Ancak, doğruluk ile ilgili soruları, ikna edici bir tarzda yanıtlamak oldukça güçtür. Bu makalede, uzaktan algılama verilerinden elde edilmiş bir harita veya sınıflandırılmış bir görüntünün doğruluğunun farklı doğruluk değerlendirme yöntemlerine göre nasıl belirlendiği, bir örnek üzerinde uygulamalı olarak anlatılmıştır.
71-88

REFERENCES

References: 

ARONOFF, S.
198
2 : Classification Accuracy : A User Approach. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, Vol.48, No.8. August 1982, pp.1299-1307.
ASPRS, 1997: Manuel of Photographic Interpretation. ASPRS (American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing), Second Edition, ISBN 1-57083-039-8, 689 sayfa.
CAMPBELL, J.B. 1996 : Introduction to Remote Sensing. Second Edition. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, The Guildford Pres, New York-London.
CARD, D.H. 1982: Using known map category marginal frequencies to improve estimates of thematic map accuracy. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 48(3): pp. 431-439.
CONGALTON, R.G. 1991: A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment 37(1): pp. 35-46.
CONGALTON, R. G.; GREEN. K. 1993: A practical look at the sources of confusion in error matrix generation. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 59, 641- 644.
CONGALTON, R.G. 1994 : Accuracy assessment of remotely sensed data: future needs and directions. In: Proceedings of Pecora 12 land information from space-based systems ( pp. 383¬388). Bethesda: ASPRS.
FOODY, G.M. 2002: Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment. 80 (2002) 185-201
HAY, A.M. 1979 : Sampling Designs to Test Land Use Map Accuracy. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, Vol.45, No.4, April 1979, pp.529-533.
HORD.R.M.; BROONER, W. 1976 : Land Use Map Accuracy Criteria. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, Vol.46, pp.671-677.
JANSSEN, L.L.F.;VAN DER WEL, F.J.M. 1994: Accuracy assessment of satellite derived land-cover data: a review. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 60, 419-426.
JENSEN, J. R. 1996: Introductory digital image processing. A remote sensing perspective.Second Edition, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.LILLESAND, T.M.;
KIEFER
, R.W., 1994 : Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation. Third Edition. ISBN 0-471-57783-9, Printed and bound by R.R.Donnelley(Crawfordsville), The cover was printed by Lehigh Pres, Printed in the USA.
MATHER, P.M. 1993 : Computer Processing of Remotely-Sensed Images. Third Edition. ISBN 0 471 90648 4. Printed and bound in Great Britain by Biddies Ltd, Guildford and King's Lynn.
RICHARDS, J.A.; JIA, X. 1999 : Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis. Third, Revised and Enlarged Edition, ISBN 3-540-64860-7, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York.
SMITS, P. C; DELLEPIANE, S. G.; SCHOWENGERDT. R. A. 1999: Quality assessment of image classification algorithms for land-cover mapping: a review and proposal for a cost-based approach. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 20, 1461-1486.
STORY, M.; CONGALTON, R.G. 1986: Accuracy assessment: a user's perspective. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 52, 397- 399.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com