Buradasınız

FARKLI MOTİVASYON ŞARTLARININ IRAKSAK DÜŞÜNME PERFORMANSINA ETKİSİ

Effect Of Motivational Factors On Divergent Thinking Ability

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
The present experiment investigated the potentially differentia! effects of motivationalfactors on divergent thinking ability. The two different motivational factors (effect of solvable and unsoivable task) and were manipulated according to the learned helplessness training. The distinction between controllable or uncontroilable outcomes is central to define helplessness training. In this study a typical helplessness procedure whic that is made up of a triadic design and leads to helplessness effect. The concept of learned helplessness (LH) is used to describe not only the typical procedures but also to describe the behavioral pattern that expresses the behavioral, motivational and cognitive shortcomings observed due to these procedures. For this reason the present experiment investigated the potentially differential effects of solvable mazes, and unsoivable mazes on divergent thinking ability. The participants were randomly assigned to solvable (n=13), unsoivable (n-13), and control (n=12) conditions. The results of the experiment showed that the group that subjected to unsoivable mazes significantly displayed low divergent thinking performance on circle drawing test than the control group [F(2,35)=4.75,p<.05)].
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu araştırma motivasyonel faktörlerin ıraksak düşünme performansının üzerindeki etkilerini inceletnek üzere yapılmıştır. Motivasyonel şartları değiş imlemede Öğrenilmiş Çaresizlik modeline özgü tipik deneysel desen kullanılmıştır. Üniversite öğrencilerinden oluşan 38 kişilik örneklem grubundan elde edilen verilere göre kontrol edilemeyen şartlara maraz kalan katılımcıların ıraksak düşünme performansı, kontrol grubuna oranla anlamlı düzeyde bozulmuştur [F(2,35)=4.75, p<.05)].
27-42

REFERENCES

References: 

Amabile, T.M.
(1979)
. Effects of external evaluation on artistic creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psycholog, 37,221-233.
Barron, F.X. ve Harrington, D.M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32,439-476.
Cameron, J. . &Amabile, T.M. (1999). Motivation and Creativity, i.y.e R.J.
Sternberg, (Eds.) Handbook of creativity (s:297-312), Cambridge Univ. Pres.
Deci, E.L. (1972). Intrinsic motivation, extrinsic reinforcement, and inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 22,113-120.
Eisenberger,R., Haskins, F. & Gambleton, P. (1999). Promised reward and creativity: Effects of prior experience. Journal of Experimental Social Psycholog, 35, 308-325.
Engberg, L.A., Hansen, G., Walker, R. L. & Thomas, D.R. (1973). Acquisition of key pecking via autoshaping as a function of prior experience: "Learned Laziness?". Science 178, 1002-1004.
Flora, S.R. (1990). Undermining intrinsic interest from the standpoint of a behaviorist. Psychological Records,4Q (3), 323-357.
Fodor, E.M.& Carver, R.A. (2000). Achievement and power motives, performance feedback, and creativity. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 380-396.
Glover, J.& Gary, A. (1976). Procedures to increase some aspects of creativity. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 9, 79-84.
GuİîfordJ.P.
(1968)
. Creativity, intelligence and their educational implications. San Diego.
Hennessey, B.A. (2000). Rewards and Creativity. . İ.y.e. C. Sansone & J.M.
Harackiewicz (Eds). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (s:55-78)
Hiroto, D. S. ( 1974) Locus of Control and Learned Helplessness. Journal of Experimental. Psychology. 102,187-193
40
SEVDA BULDUK - AYHAN ECE
Hiroto, D. S.
&
Seligman M. E. P.
(1975
) Generality learned helplessness in man. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 31,311-327
Lytton, H. (1971). Creativity and education, Penguin Books, London.
Mac Kinnon, D.V. (1962). The nature and nurture of creative talent. American Psychologist. 17,484-495.
Martindale, C. (1999). Biological bases of creativity, i.y.e R.J. Sternberg, (Eds.) Handbook of creativity (s: 137-152), Cambridge Univ. Pres.
Oakes, W.F. & Curtis, N. (1982) Learned Helplessness: Not dependent upon cognitions, attributions, or other such phenomenal experiences. Journal of Personality. 50,387-408.
Overmier, J. B:, & Seligman, M. E. P. (1967) Effects of inescapable shock upon subsequent escape and avoidance learning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. 63, 23-33.
Peterson, C, Maier, S.F., & Seligman, M.E.P. (1993). Learned helplessness :A theory for the age of personal control. Oxford Univ. Press.
Runco, M.A. (1993). Operant theories of insight originality, and creativity. American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 37(1), 54-67.
Runco, M.A & Mraz, W (1992). Scoring divergent thinking test using total ideational output and a creativity index. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 52 (1), 213-222.
Ryan, R.M.& Deci, E.L. (2000). When rewards compete with nature: The İndderminin of intrinsic motivation and self regulation. İ.y.e. C. Sansone & J.M. Harackiewicz (Eds). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (s: 14-54)
Torrance, E.P. (1962). Guiding creative talent. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall.
Torrance, E.P. (1974). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms-technical manua.Lexington, M.A
Torrance, E.P. (1983). The importance of falling in love with something. Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 8,,72-78.
IRAKSAK. DÜŞÜNME
41
Tyson, M.
(1966)
. Creativity; In new horizons of psychology, Penguin Books, London
Yamamato, K. (1965). Effects of restriction of range and test unreliability on correlationbetween measures of intelligence and creative thinking. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 35, 300¬305.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com