Buradasınız

YOLSUZLUK VE YOLSUZLUĞUN VERGİ YAPISI ÜZERİNE ETKİLERİ

Corruption and Effects on Tax Structure

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Corruption hasn’t a new phenomenon, but in recent years It has attracted increasing attention. Corruption which has been defined in many different ways, that is the abuse of public power for private benefit. This is the definition used by the World Bank. Especially in the decade of the 1990s, the fact that corruption has attracted a great deal of attention in developed - developing countries has based on many reasons. Corruption has so a complex structure that it hasn’t been explained only one factor. The improved factors that promote for corruption of explaining this complex strucutre can gather two main titles: Direct factors (regulations in law and authorizations, tax structure, spending decisions, provision for goods and services at below market prices etc.) and indirect factors (Quality of the bureaucracy, level of public sector wages, penalty system etc.) Also, corruption includes many economic, financial, social and politics effects. It is showed that corruption level is higher in developing countries than developed countries. In this area, various invetigations on curruption are showed that tax structure is one of factor to be causing corruption. At the same time, it has been indicated that tax revenue are influenced negatively by the level of corruption in taxation. Countries with high level of corruption have lower collection of tax revenue in relation to GDP (given other factors). This paper presents relationship between corruption and tax structure as empirical study for Turkey. In addition, given main measures against corruption have taken place in this paper.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Yeni bir fenomen olmayan yolsuzluga, son yillarda artan bir ilgi sözkonusudur. Farkli tanimlari yapilan yolsuzluk, en yaygin ve basit sekliyle özel çikar için kamu gücünün suistimal edilmesi olarak tanimlanabilir. Bu Dünya Bankasinin kullandigi bir tanimdir. Özellikle 1990’li yillardan sonra tüm gelismis-gelismekte olan ülkelerin yolsuzluga daha fazla önem vermelerinin çesitli nedenleri bulunmaktadir.Yolsuzluk tek bir faktörle açiklanamayacak kadar karmasik bir yapiya sahiptir. Bu karmasik yapiyi açiklamak üzere gelistirilen, yolsuzlugu tesvik edici faktörler iki ana baslikta toplanabilir. Bunlar; dogrudan faktörler (hukuki düzenlemeler ve izinler, vergileme yapisi, harcama kararlari, piyasa fiyatinin altinda mal ve hizmet sunumu gibi) ve dolayli faktörlerdir (bürokrasinin niteligi, kamu sektörü ücret düzeyi, ceza sistemi gibi). Yolsuzlugun birtakim ekonomik, mali, sosyal ve siyasal etkileri vardir. Ayrica yolsuzluk düzeyinin gelismekte olan ülkelerde, gelismis ülkelere göre daha yüksek oldugu görülmektedir. Bu alanda yapilan çesitli arastirmalar, vergi yapisinin yolsuzluga neden olan bir faktör oldugunu göstermektedirler. Ayni zamanda vergileme alaninda yolsuzluk da vergi gelirlerini olumsuz yönde etkilemektedir. Yüksek yolsuzluk düzeyine sahip ülkelerde tahsil edilen vergilerin GSYIH içindeki payi (diger faktörler veri iken) daha düsük olmaktadir. Bu çalismada Türkiye’de yolsuzluk ve vergi yapisi arasindaki iliskisiyi göstermeye yardimci olan bir ampirik çalismaya ve yolsuzluga karsi alinmasi gereken temel önlemlere yer verilmektedir.
111-138

REFERENCES

References: 

Ades, A. and D. Tella, R. (1999), “Rents Competition and Corruption”,
, 89(4), 982-983.
Bardhan, P. (September, 1997), “Corruption and Development: A Review of
Issues”, , XXXV(3), 1320-1346.
Berck, P. J. and Maher, M. W. (1986), “A Comparison of Bribery and Bidding in
Thin Markets”, , 20(1), 1-5.
Besley, T. and Mclaren, J. (January, 1993), “Taxes and Bribery: The Role of
Wage Incentives”, , 103, 119-141.
Carvajal, R. (March, 1999), “Large-Scale Corruption: Definition, Causes, and
Cures”, , 12(4), 335-353.
Cingi, S. (1994), “Yolsuzluk Olgusu ve Ekonomik Analizi Üzerine Notlar”,
, 12, 1-12.
Del Monte, A. and Papagni, E. (2001), “Public Expenditures, Corruption, and
Economic Growth: The Case of Italy”, ,
17, 1-16.
Dimov, M. (2003), “Corruption in Balkan Countries”,
, 285-288.
Dye, K.M. nad Stapenhurst, R. (1998), “Pillars of Integrity: The Importance of
Supreme Audit Institutions in Curbing Corruption”, ,
Institude of The World Bank.
Fisman, R. and Gatti, R. (2002), “Decentralization and Corruption: Evidence
Across Countries”, , 83(3), 325-345.
Fjeldstad, O-H. and Tungodden, B. (2001),
, Bergen: CMI Working Papers,WP 2001:13.
Flatters, F. & Macleod, W. B. (1995), “Administrative Corruption and
Taxation”, , 2, 397-417.
Galtung, F. (2003), “2002 Bribe Payers Index”, ,
266-268.
Gatti, R. Paternostro, S. and Rigolini, J. (2003), “Individual Attitudes Toward
Corruption: Do Social Effects Matter?”, 1-19.
Ghura, D. (1998), “Tax Revenue in Sub-Saharan Africa: Effecets of Economic
Policies and Corruption”, , WP/98/135, 1-24.
Goorha, P. (2000), “Corruption: Theory and Evidence Through Economies in
Transition”, , 27(12), 1180-1204.
Gould, D. J. and Amaro-Reyes, J. A. (1983), “The Effects of Corruption on
Administrative Performance”, , No: 580.
Huther, J. and Shah, A. (1998),
, World Bank Research Working Paper,
No:1894.
IMF, (2001).
http://www.imf.org/external/np/fad/trans/code.htm#code
Karakas, E. (2000), “Dünya’da Kamu Mali Yönetimi ve Seffaflik”,
, Antalya: Akdeniz Üniversitesi I.I.B.F.
Yayin No:3, 19-25.
Knack, S. and Azfar, O. (2003), “Gender and Corruption”,
, 295-297.
Lambsdorff, J. G. (2002), “Corruption and Rent-Seeking”, , 113,
97-125.
Lambsdorff, j.G. (2003), “2002 Corruption Perceptions Index”,
, 262-265.
(2000), ”Parliament and Good Governance: The
Challenge of Controlling Corruption”, Canada:
Mauro, P. (August, 1995), “Corruption and Growth”,
, CX(3), 681-712.
McMullan, M. (1961), “ A Theory of Corruption”, , 9, 181-201.
Mookherjee, D. (1997), “Incentives Reforms in Developing Country
Bureaucracies. Lesson from Tax Administration”,
, Washinton: World Bank.
Potter, B. (2002),
, New York: United Nations.
Rijckeghem, C. V. And Weder, B. (1997), “Corruption and The Rate of
Temptation: Do Low Wages in The Civil Service Cause Corruption?”,
, WP/97/73, 1-56.
Rooke, P. (September, 1999), “National Integrity, The Enemy of Corruption,
Collusion and Nepotism: A Transparency International Perspective”,
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
International Journal of Social Economics
World Bank Staff Working Paper
Applying a Simple Measure of Good Governance
to The Debate on Fiscal Decentralization
Revised Code of Good Practices on Fiscal Transparency
15. Türkiye
Maliye Sempozyumu 15-17 Mayis 2000
Global Corruption
Report 2003
Public Choice
Global
Corruption Report 2003
1998 Laurentian Seminar
The Quartely Journal of
Economics
Sociolgy Review
The Annual Bank Conference
on Development Economics
Fiscal Transparency, Fiscal Rules and Globalization: AWay
Forward For Developing and Transition Economics
IMF
Working Paper
The
137
.
www.infid.orid/oldconf/1999/Peter Rooke.htm.
Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. W. (August, 1993), “Corruption”,
, CVIII(3), 599-617.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2002), “New perspectives on Public Finance: Recent
Achievements and Future Challenges”, , 86, 341-
360.
Tanzi, V. (May, 1998), “Corruption Around The World: Causes, Consequences,
Scope, and Cures”, , 1-39.
Tanzi, V. (2003), .
www.alb.org/Documents/Conference/Governance-Corruption-
PFM/01govern.pdf.
T. C. Maliye Bakanligi verileri.
Tella, R. and Schargrodsky, E. (2003), “Controlling Corruption Through High
Wages”, , 289-291.
Transparency International data.
Treisman, D. (2000), “The Causes of Corruption: a Cross-National Study”,
, 76, 399-457.
Turhan, S. (1993), , Istanbul: Filiz Kitabevi.
(2002), Ankara: T.C. Maliye Bakanligi
Wane, W. (2003),
,World Bank,Washington:
Wolkers, M. (2003), “National Surveys on Corruption in Francophone Africa”,
, 269-270.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com