Buradasınız

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS AND ROUTING TECHNIQUES IN LEO SATELLITE SYSTEMS

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
In this paper, we survey techniques for routing and performance analysis of Low Earth Orbit (LEO) systems. We first review the basic structure of LEO satellite communications and present the main characteristics of LEO systems. The dynamic characteristics of LEO systems make the performance analysis and routing problem quite complicated. In this study, we review some of the proposed solutions to these problems. We explain the two main criteria for the calculation of performance analysis: blocking probability of ongoing calls during handover and the new call blocking probability. Then we mention which way is the most preferable and what are done during the calculation process.
1363-1372

REFERENCES

References: 

[1] http://www.teledesic.com
[2] WU, W. W., Miller, E. F., Pritchar,W. L.
Mobile Satellite Communications, Proceedings
of IEEE, 82(9), pages 1431-1447, 1994.
Performance Analysis and Routing Techniques in LEO Satellite Systems
A. Halim ZAIM, Derya YILTAS
1371
[3] Priscoli, F. D. “Functional Areas for
Advanced Mobile Satellite Systems”, IEEE
Personal Communications, Dec.1997, pages
34-40.
[4] Sturza, M. A. “Architecture of the Teledesic
Satellite System”. Proc. IMSC’95, Ottawa,
Canada, June 1995, pages 212-218.
[5] Hara, T. “ORBCOMM PCS Available Now!”
IEEE MILCOM’95, vol.2, pages 874-878, 1995.
[6] Grubb, J. L. “Iridium Overview: The
Traveler’s Dream Come True”. IEEE
Communications Magazine, Nov. 1991, pages
48-51.
[7] Maine, K., Devieux, C., Swan, P. “Overview
of Iridium Satellite Network”. WESCON’95,
pages 483-490.
[8] Leopold, R. J., Miller, A., Grubb, J. L. “The
Iridium System: A New Paradigm in Personal
Communications”. Applied Microwave and
Wireless, 1993, pages 68-76.
[9] Dietrich, F. J., Metzen, P., Monte, P. “The
Globalstar Cellular Satellite System”. IEEE
Transaction on Antennas and Propagation, Vol.
46, No. 6, June 1998, pp.935-942.
[10] Logsdon, T. “Orbital Mechanics Theory
And Applications”, John Wiley And Sons. 1998,
Canada.
[11] Husson, J.C. “Satellite Constellations”.
Alcatel Reviews, July 1997.
[12] Jilla, C. D., Miller, D. W. “Satellite Design:
Past, Present and Future”. International Journal
of Small Satellite Engineering. Feb. 1997.
[13] Ganz, A., Gong, Y., Li, B. “Performance
Study of Low Earth-Orbit Satellite Systems”.
IEEE Transactions on Communications, Vol.42,
No:2/3/4, February/March/April, 1994.
[14] Jamalipour, A., “Low Earth Orbital
Satellites for Personal Communication
Networks”, ISBN:0-89006-955-7.
[15] Papapetrou, E., Gragopoulos, I., Pavlidou,
F.N. “Performance Evaluation of LEO satellite
constellations with intersatellite links under selfsimilar
and Poisson Traffic”. Int. Journal of
Satellite Communications, Vol.17, pp.51-
64,1999.
[16] Zaim, A.Halim, Rouskas, George N.,
Perros, Harry G. “Calculation of Call Blocking
Probabilities in LEO Satellite Systems:Single
Orbit Case”. Technical Report, NCSU, 2000.
[17] Zaim, A.Halim, Rouskas, George N.,
Perros, Harry G. “Calculation of Call Blocking
Probabilities in LEO Satellite Systems”.
Technical Report, NCSU, 2001.
[18] Santos, V., Silva, R., Dinis, M., Neves, J.
“Performance Evaluation of Channel Assignment
Strategies and Handover Policies for Satellite
Mobile Networks”. Int. Conference on Universal
Personal Communications, 1995, pp.86-90.
[19] Re, E.D., Fantacci, R., Giambene, G.
“Different Queueing Policies for Handover
Requests in Low Earth Orbit Mobile Satellite
Systems”. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular
Technology, Vol.48, No.2, March, 1999.
[20] Re, E.D., Fantacci, R., Giambene, G.
“Efficient Dynamic Channel Allocation
Techniques with Handover Queueing for Mobile
Satellite Networks”. IEEE Journal on Selected
Areas in Communications, Vol.13, No.2,
February, 1995.
[21] Re, E.D., Fantacci, R., Giambene, G. “Call
Blocking Performance for Dynamic Channel
Allocation Technique in Future Mobile Satellite
Systems”. IEEE Proc. Commun.,Vol.143, No.5,
October, 1996.
[22] Pennoni, G., Ferroni, A.. “Mobility
Management in LEO/ICO Satellite Systems
Preliminary Simulation Results”.
PIMRC’94/WCN, pp.1323-1329, 1994.
[23] Dosiere, F., Zein, T., Maral, G., Boutes, J.
P. “A Model for the Handover Traffic in Low
Earth-Orbiting (LEO) Satellite Networks for
Personal Communications”. IEEE Globecom’93,
Vol.1, 1993, pp.574-578.
[24] Ruiz, G., Doumi, T. L., Gardiner, J.G.
“Teletraffic Analysis and Simulation for
Nongeostationary Mobile Satellite systems”.
IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology,
vol.47, No.1, February, 1998, pp.311-320.
Performance Analysis and Routing Techniques in LEO Satellite Systems
A. Halim ZAIM, Derya YILTAS
1372
[25] Restrepo, J., Maral, G. “Guaranteed
Handover (GH) Service in a Non-Geo
Constellation with “Satellite-Fixed Cell” (SFC)
Systems”. Int. Mobile Satellite Conference,
1997.
[26] Wan, P.J., Nguyen, V., Bai, H. “Advance
Handovers Arrangement and Channel Allocation
in LEO Satellite Systems”. Global
Telecommunications Conference, Vol.1a, 1999.
[27] Obradovic, V., Cigoj, S. “Performance
Evaluation of Prioritized Handover Management
For LEO Mobile Satellite Systems with Dynamic
Channel Assignment”. Global
Telecommunications Conference, Vol.1a, 1999.
[28] Werner, M. “A Dynamic Routing Concept
For ATM-Based Satellite Personal
Communication Networks”. IEEE Journal On
Selected Areas In Communications, Vol.15, No.8,
October 1997, pp.1636-1648.
[29] Werner, M., Delucchi, C., Vogel, H.J.,
Maral, G., DeRidder, J.J. “ATM-Based Routing
in LEO/MEO Satellite Networks with
Intersatellite Links”. IEEE Journal on Selected
Areas in Communications, Vol.15, No.1, January
97, pp.69-81.
[30] Werner, M., Berndl, G., Edmaier, B.
“Performance of Optimized Routing in LEO
Intersatellite Link Networks”. IEEE Vehicular
Technology Conference, 1997, vol.1 pp.246-250.
[31] Werner, M., Mayer, C., Maral, G.,
Holzbock, M. “A Neural Network Approach to
Distributed Adaptive Routing of LEO
Intersatellite Link Traffic”. VTC’98, 1998,
pp.1498-1502.
[32] Mauger, R., Rosenberg, C. “QoS
Guarantees For Multimedia Services On A
TDMA-Based Satellite Network”. IEEE
Communications Magazine, July 1997, pp.56-65.
[33] Chang, H.S., Kim, B.W., Lee, C.G., Min,
S.L., Choi, Y., Yang, H.S., Kim, D.N., Kim,
C.S. “Performance Comparison of Static Routing
and Dynamic Routing in Low Earth Orbit
Satellite Networks”. IEEE 46th Vehicular
Technology Conference, vol.2, pp.1240-1243,
1996.
[34] Chang, H.S., Kim, B.W., Lee, C.G., Min,
S.L., Choi, Y., Yang, H.S., Kim, C.S.
“Topological Design and Routing for LEO
Satellite Networks”. Proc. Of GLOBECOM,
pp.529-535, 1995.
[35] Chang, H.S., Kim, B.W., Lee, C.G., Min,
S.L., Choi, Y., Yang, H.S., Kim, D.N., Kim,
C.S. “FSA-Based Link Assignment and Routing
in Low Earth Orbit Satellite Networks”. IEEE
Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Vol.47,
No.3, August 1998.
[36] Uzunalioglu, H., Yen, W., Akyildiz, F. “A
Connection Handover Protocol for LEO Satellite
ATM Networks”. Proc. ACM/IEEE MOBICOM,
1997, pp.204-214.
[37] Uzunalioglu, H. “Probabilistic Routing
Protocols for Low Earth Orbit Satellite
Networks”. Proc. IEEE ICC, 1998.
[38] Tam, P.T.S., Lui, J.C.S., Chan, H.W., Sze,
C.C.N., Sze, C.N. “An Optimized Routing
Scheme and a Channel Reservation Strategy for
a Low Earth Orbit Satellite System”. IEEE
VTC’99, Vol.5, 1999.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com