Buradasınız

Maden yataklarının değerlendirilmesinde geliştirilmiş yöntemler: halka ayrışım yöntemi ve uygulaması

Improved methods for ore deposit evaluation: ring decomposition method and its application

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Ore deposit evaluation techniques by geostatistical simulation were first introduced some 25 years ago,, it has not fulfilled its promise as a major toot in the eartksciences. This has been largely due to two main reasons; there are some shortcomings in the method which, although recognized early on by some practitioners,, have been stow to be acknowledged and rectified, and alternatively wide usage qfkriging methods (there is although a big difference between kriging and simulation). Â survey of geostatistical simulation methods is given in Dowd (1992). Amongst proposed methods is Davis" (1987a) LU (lower and upper) decomposition method and related matrix- polynomial approximation method (Davis,, 1987b). The LU-matrix (lower and. upper) decomposition method of conditional simulation allows fast generation of stochastic processes on smallmoderate sized, grids. The method is simple and based on the LU triangular decomposition of the matrix of covariances between data, locations and simulation grid, locations (Davis, 1987a; Alabert,, 1987).. Covariances matrices are symmetric and positive-definite and therefore can be decomposed into the product of a lower and an upper triangular matrix,. The advantages of the LU method are that it is simple to implement, performs conditioning simultaneously with simulation, is not limited to particular forms of covariance functions and handles anisotropies,. The main drawback of this method is the amount of storage required which, at least in its general form as presented,, effectively limits its application to less than 1000 grid locations. When there are many data, or when there is a large number of points on which values are to be simulated, the correspondingiy large matrices cannot he handled by classical decomposition algorithms.This paper shows how ring decomposition can he used to extend the use of LU decomposition to larger simulations.. Ring decomposition can he applied to reduce significantly this memory-size problem,, and therefore proposed method can he used fof large grid locations. After introducing the mathematical background of ring decomposition method, conditional simulation applications using lower-upper and ring decomposition methods are presented in the study. For the purpose of providing a comparison, simulations on 400 x 400 covariance matrix were pet formed using both LU decomposition and ring decomposition. The results are shown in Figures 1 and. 2.. The both methods yield satisfactory simulations.. Finally a 1500 x 1500 covariance matrix which is too large for LU decomposition method is solved by ring decomposition and the result is given in Figure 3.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmada maden yataklarının değerlendirilmesinde kullanılan jeoistatistiksel simülasyon yöntemlerinden "alt ve üst üçgensel matris ayrışım .tekniği'" ayrıntılı olarak anlatılmaktadır. Kovaryans matrisinin üçgensel analizini kullanarak, orta boyottaki gridler üzerinde hızlı bir şekilde koşullu simülasyonu gerçekleştiren alt ve üst 'üçgensel matris tekniğinin algoritmasının büyük boyutlu gridler üzerinde simülasyonu sağlayamadığı gösterilmektedir,. Çalışmada bu yönteme alternatif olarak geliştirilen ve halka, ayrışım tekniği adı verilen matris analizi alternatif olarak sunulmakta ve önerilen yeni teknik büyük boyutlu gridler üzerinde kullanılabilmektedir. Geliştirilen yeni yöntemin matematiksel temeli verildikten sonra her. iki yönteme ilişkin koşullu simülasyon uygulamaları sunulmaktadır. İlk önce yöntemleri birbirleriyle karşılaştırmak amacıyla 400 x 400 kovaryans matrisinden oluşan simülasyon uygulaması alt/üst üçgensel matris tekniği ve halka, ayrışım tekniği kullanarak çözülmekte, ardından da alt/üst üçgensel matris tekniğiyle ayrıştınlamayacak boyutlarda olan 1500 x 1500 kovaryans matrisinden oluşan simülasyon., önerilen halka ayrışım tekniğiyle çözülmektedir.
51-60

REFERENCES

References: 

Alabert,, E, 1987,,, The practise of fast conditional simulations
through the LU décomposition
of the covariance matrix; Mathematical
Geology,, v. 19, no. 5,, 369-386.
Anderson, F.W. and Fuller, K..R.., 1992, Rings and
categories of modules: Second Edition.,,
Graduate texts in mathematics, Springer-
Verlag New York. Inc., no. 13.
Davis, M., 1987a, Production of conditional simulations
via. the LU decomposition, of the covariance
matrix: Mathematical. Geology,
v. 19 , no. 2, 91-98,
Davis, ML, 19871b, Generating large stochastic simulations-
the matrix polynomial .approximation
method: Mathematical Geology, v.
19, no. 2, 99-108.
Deutsch, C.V.,, and Journel, A...G.,,, 1.998, GSLIB, Geostatistical
Software Library and User's
Guide: Second Edition, Oxford University
Press, New York, 369 s.
Dowd, P.A., 1992,, A review of recent developmentsin
geostatistics: Computers and Geosciences,
v. 17, no. 10,1481-1500.
Dowd, P.A. a&d Saraç,. C, 1993, An extension of the
LU decomposition method of simulation,
in Geostatistical Simulations, eds: P.A.
Dowd and M. Armstrong: Kluwer Academic
Publishers., 'The Netherlands., 23-36..
Gomez-Hernandez, XX and Srivastava, R.M., 1990.»
ISIM3D: an ANSI-C three-dimensional
multiple indicator conditional simulation
program: Computer and Geosciences, v.
16,, no. 4, 395-440.
Journel, A.G. and .Alabert, F., 1989, Non-Gaussian
data expansion in the earth science: Terra
Nova,v. 1, 123-134.
Journel, A.G. and Alabert, F., 1990, New method for
reservoir mapping;: Journal of Petroleum
Technology, v.. 42,, no.. 2,, 212-218..
Kaseli, F., 1982, Modules and rings: London Mathematical
Society, Academic Press Inc.,
England.
Saraç, C. and Tercan, A.E.,. 1992, A geostatistical
case study of the .Kizilyuksek-Yataardic
chromium orehody: The first international
symposium on Eastern Mediterranean
Geology,, Çukurova. University, Adana,
Turkey, 219-229.,
Suro-Peiez, V. and Journel, A.G., 1990, Stochastic
simulation of lithofacies and improved
sequential indicator approach: Proc.
Second European Conference on the Mathematics
of Oil Recovery (ECMOR),
Publ. Technip, Paris, 3-10.
Tercan, A..E. and Saraç,. C, 2000, Spatial variability
of Cr2O3 % in Kizilyuksek-Yataardic
chromium deposit (Adana.,. Turkey): International
Geology Review (in press)..

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com