Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

DAVOS OLAYININ GAZETE KÖŞE YAZILARI BAĞLAMINDA SÖYLEM ÇÖZÜMLEMESİ

THE REPRESENTATION OF THE DAVOS EVENT IN TURKISH DAILY NEWSPAPER EDITORIALS

Journal Name:

  • The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies

Publication Year:

  • 2014
DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.9761/JASSS2267

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The aim of this article is to investigate the ideological opposition appeared, as a result of Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan’s Davos outburst in 2009, in World Economic forum in Switzerland, in Turkish daily newspaper editorials. The study concentrates on the representations of the Davos event in the editorials of two daily newspapers of opposing political and ideological stance. The analysis aims to identify, through transitivity analysis from the Systemic Functional Grammar, and explain how ideology is constructed and presented through language use in two ideologically opposing Turkish newspapers’ editorial sections. The analysis of transitivity indicates how, through choices from the lexicogrammar, certain semantic roles and relationships are reproduced in the ideologically constructed discursive practices. Through positioning of participants and process choices, and their positioning in the clause, we could reasonably speculate on the ideologies of the news reports. By means of ideational, interpersonal and textual functions of language, aspects of clause grammar which have to do with ideational meanings will be focused on in this study. Emphasis will be placed on the construction of ideological discourse by determining the transitivity patterns expressed with propositions through representational processes in the two Turkish daily newspapers editorials of opposing political stance. The findings indicate that linguistic choices of transitivity play a fundamental role in propagation of dominant ideologies both implicitly and explicitly in newspaper editorials.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmanın amacı, Başbakan R.T. Erdoğan’ın 2009 yılında İsviçre’nin Davos şehrinde gerçekleştirilen Dünya Ekonomik Forumun’da tanık olunan ‘one minute’ çıkışının, iki zıt politik görüşte günlük gazetenin köşe yazılarına nasıl yansıdığını incelemektir. Köşe yazılarında kullanılan dil tümcelerin anlam içeriğinin betimlenmesiyle incelenecektir. Bu inceleme dizgeci-işlevsel dilbilgisinin başlıca inceleme yöntemlerinden olan geçişlilik çözümlemesi yoluyla yapılacaktır. Geçişlilik, anlamın tümcede simgelenme şeklidir. Bu inceleme aracılığıyla, ideolojik farklılıkların dilsel seçimler yoluyla gazetelerde okuyucuya nasıl aktarıldığı betimlenmeye çalışılacaktır. Geçişlilik çözümlemesi, ideolojik yönlendirmeli söylemlerde cümle içindeki bazı anlamsal ilişkilerin dilin sözcük-dilbilgisel (lexicogrammatical) yapısından nasıl aktarıldığını irdeleyen bir çözümleme yöntemidir. Geçişlilik çözümlemesinin gerçekleşebilmesi için metinde belli süreç türlerinin ve katılımcıların kullanılıp kullanılmadığı ve bunların metinde nasıl konumlandırıldığı ortaya çıkarılmalıdır. Dilin düşünsel (ideational), bireylerarası (interpersonal), ve metinsel (textual) işlevleri aracılığıyla sözdizimsel öğelerin örüntüleme seçenekleri ortaya çıkar. Bu çalışmada, dilin düşünsel işlevi aracılığıyla ve geçişlilik çözümlemesi yöntemiyle, farklı politik görüşlerde iki gazetede bulunan köşe yazılarındaki önermesel geçişlilik yapıları ortaya çıkarılacaktır. Geçişlilik çeşitli dilsel seçenekler sağladığı için, metindeki süreç türlerinin ve katılımcıların farklı konumlandırılmaları, politik bakış açısını yansıtan, ideolojik olarak anlamlı dilsel seçim örnekleri köşe yazılarında sergilenmektedir. Bu çalışmanın veri tabanını oluşturan, Başbakan Erdoğan’ın Davos çıkışını konu alan köşe yazarları, eylemin kendisi ve eyleme dahil olanlara ilişkin anlamsal rolleri düzenlerken ve tümcelerini yapılandırırken, kendi ideolojilerine göre, belli dilsel örüntüleme seçimleri yapmışlar ve bu seçimlerle de eylemin öğelerini farklı biçimde konumlandırmışlardır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-davos-olayinin-gazete-kose-yazilari-baglaminda-soylem-cozumlemesi.pdf
  • 1
251
282
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

ALİRIZA, Bülent (2011). The Turkish-Israeli Crisis and U.S. –Turkish relations. Center for Strategic and International Studies. Retrieved from: http://csis.org/publication/turkish-israeli-crisis-and-us-turkish-relations
AYDINTAŞBAŞ, Aslı (2009). Erdogan's Davos Outburst Is Nothing New. Forbes. Retrieved from:
http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/30/erdogan-turkey-davos-opinions-contribut...
BLOOMEART, Jan and Jef VERSCHUEREN (1998). Debating Diversity: Analysing the Discourse of Tolerance. London: Routledge.
BOLIVAR, Adriana (1994). ”The Structure of Newspaper Editorials”. In Advances in Written Text Analysis, ed. by Malcolm Coulthard, 276-294. London: Routledge.
DAVUTOĞLU, Ahmet (2005). Stratejik Derinlik: Türkiye’nin Uluslararası Konumu. Küre Yayınları: İstanbul.
FAIRCLOUGH, Norman (1989). Language and Power. London: Longman.
FAIRCLOUGH, Norman (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
FAIRCLOUGH, Norman (1995). Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold.
FAIRCLOUGH, Norman (2003). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
FOWLER, Roger (1991). Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge.
GOATLY, Peter A (2000). Critical Reading and Writing. London: Routledge.
HALLIDAY, Michael A. K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic - the interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold, Ltd.
Davos Olayının Gazete Köşe Yazıları Bağlamında Söylem Çözümlemesi 279
HALLIDAY,Michael A. K. (1985). A Short Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold, Ltd.
HALLIDAY, Michael A.K. (1990). “New Ways of Meaning: A Challenge to Applied Linguistics.” Plenary address presented at the Ninth World Congress of Applied Linguistics, Thessaloniki, Greece. Also published in the Journal of Applied Linguistics 6: 7-36.
HALLIDAY, Michael A.K. (1994). Introduction to Functional Grammar. 2nd. .edn. London: Arnold.
HODGE, Robert and Günther KRESS (2nd ed).( 1993). Language as Ideology. London: Routledge.
HOLQUIST, Michael (1983). “The Politics of Representation”. The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparitive Human Cognition 5: 2-9.
INBAR, Efraim (2011). “Israeli-Turkish Tensions and their International Ramifications”. Orbis 55(1): 132-146.
KARLSBERG, Michael (2005). “The Power of Discourse and the Discourse of Power: Pursuing Peace through Discourse Intervention”. International Journal of Peace Studies 10(1): 1-25.
KRESS, Günther (1983). “Linguistic Processes and The Mediation of ‘reality’: The Politics of Newspaper Language”. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 40: 43–58.
LIHUA, Liu (2009). “ Discourse Construction of Social Power: interpersonal rhetoric in editorials of the China Daily”. Discourse Studies 11(1): 59–78.
MEHAN, Hugh and John WILLS (1988). “MEND: A Nurturing Voice in the Nuclear Arms Debate”. Social Problems 35(4): 363-383.
MUNTIGL, Peter (2002). “Politicization and Depoliticization: Employment Policy in the European Union”. In Politics as Talk and Text, ed by Paul A. Chilton, and Christina Schäffner , 45– 79. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
MORLEY, John (2004). ”Modals in Persuasive Journalism: An example from the Economist”. In English Modality in Prespective. Genre Analysis and Contrastive Studies. ed. by Roberta Facchietti, and Frank Palmer , 67-82 . Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.
OKTAR, Lütfiye ( 2001). “The Ideological Organization of Representational Processes in the Presentation of us and them”. Discourse and Society 12 (3): 313-346.
SHAPIRO, Michael (1988). The Politics of Representation. Madison WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
280
Nazlı BAYKAL
SZYMANSKI, Adam (2010). “Crisis in Turkey–Israel Relations”. Bulletin. The Polish Institute of International Affairs 18 (94): 182 – 183.
SIMPSON, Paul (1993). Language, Ideology and Point of View. London: Routledge.
TEO, Peter (2000). “Racism in the News: A Critical Discourse Analysis of News Reporting in Two Australian Newspapers”. Discourse and Society 11 (1): 7-49.
THETELA, Puleng (2001). “Critique Discourses and Ideology in Newspaper Reports: A Discourse Analysis of the South African Press Reports on the 1998 SADC’S Military Intervention in Lesotho”. Discourse and Society 12 (3): 347-370.
THOMPSON, John B. (1990). Ideology and Modern Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
TURAN, Tolga (2008). “Turkish Foreign Policy Towards Israel: The Implications of Turkey’s Relations with the West”. MA Thesis, Middle East Technical University: Turkey.
TURGUT, Pelin (2009). Behind the Turkish Prime Minister's Outburst at Davos. Time World. Availableat http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1875981,00.html.
TREW, Tony (1979). “What Papers Say: Linguistic Variation and Ideological Difference”. In Language and Control ed. by Roger Fowler, Robert Hodge, and Günther Kress, 117-157. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
VAN DIJK, Teun A. (1980). Macrostructures. An interdisciplinary study of global structures in discourse, interaction, and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
VAN DIJK, Teun A., and Walter Kintsch (1983). Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
VAN DIJK, Teun A. (1984). Prejudice in discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
VAN DIJK, Teun A. (1987). Communicating racism: Ethnic prejudice in thought and talk. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
VAN DIJK, Teun A. (1991). Racism and the press. London: Routledge.
VAN DIJK, Teun A. (1992). “Racism and Argumentation: Race Riot Rhetoric in Tabloid Editorials”. In Argumentation Illuminated ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren et.al, 242-259. Dodrecht:Foris.
VAN DIJK, Teun A. (1993). Elite discourse and racism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
VAN DIJK, Teun A. (1995). “Discourse Semantics and Ideology”. Discourse and Society 6(2): 243-89.
VAN DIJK, Teun A. (1995). Opinions and Ideologies in Editorials. In Paper for the 4th International Symposium of Critical Discourse Analysis, Language, Social Life and Critical Thought, Athens, 14-16 December. Available at:
Davos Olayının Gazete Köşe Yazıları Bağlamında Söylem Çözümlemesi 281
http://www.discourses.org/UnpublishedArticles/Opinions%20and%20ideologie....
VAN DIJK, Teun A. (1996). “Opinions and Ideologies in Editorials”. Available at http://www.hum.uva.nl/teun/editoria.htm.
VAN DIJK, Teun A. (1997). “Context models and text processing”. In Cognition and Consciousness, ed. by Maxim I. Stamenow, 189-226). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
VAN DIJK, Teun A. (1998). “Opinions and ideologies in the press”. In Approaches to Media Discourse, ed. by Allan Bell, and Peter Garrett , 21-63. Oxford: Blackwell.
VAN DIJK, Teun A. (1999). “Media, Racism and Monitoring”. In International Media Monitoring, ed. by Kaarle Nordenstreng, and Michael S. Griffin, 307-316. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
VAN DIJK, Teun A. (2001). “Multidisciplinary CDA: A Plea for Diversity”. In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis , ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 95 – 120. London: SAGE.
VAN DIJK, Teun A. (2002). “Political Discourse and Political Cognition”. In Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse, ed. by Paul Chilton, and Christina Schaffner, 204 – 236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
VAN DIJK, Teun A. (2005a). “Politics, ideology and discourse” In Elsevier Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Volume on Politics and Language, ed. by Ruth Wodak, 728-740. Oxford:Elsevier.
VAN DIJK, Teun A. (2005b). “War rhetoric of a little ally. Political implicatures of Aznar's Legitimization of the War in Iraq”. Journal of Language and Politics 4(1): 65-92.
VAN DIJK, Teun A. (2006). “Ideology and discourse analysis”. Journal of Political Ideologies 11: 115–40.
VAN DIJK, Teun A. (2009). “Critical Discourse Studies: A Sociocognitive Approach”. In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis , ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 62-86. London: Sage.
VAUGHAN, Caroline H. (1995). “A Comparative Discourse Analysis of Editorials on the Lebanon 1982 Crisis”. In Language and Peace , ed. by Christina Schaffner,and Anita L. Wenden, 61- 74. England: Darthmouth.
WENDEN, Anita L., and Christina SCHAFFNER(1999). “Introduction”. In Language and Peace , ed. by Christina Schaffner, and Anita L. Wenden, xi – xxi. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Press.
282
Nazlı BAYKAL
WENDEN, Anita L. (2003). “Achieving a Comprehensive Peace: The Linguistic Factor”. Peace and Change: A Journal of Peace Reseach 18(2): 169-201.
WENDEN, Anita L. (2005). “The Politics of Representation: A Critical Discourse Analysis of an Aljazeera Special Report”. International Journal of Peace Studies 10(2): 89-112.
WESTIN, Ingrid (2002). “Language Change in Newspaper Editorials”. In Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics, No.44. Amsterdam:Rodopi.
WODAK, Ruth (2001). “What CDA is About – a Summary of Its History, Important Concepts and Developments”. In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis , ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer,
1 – 13. London: Sage Publications.
WODAK, Ruth (2002). “Fragmented Identities: Redefining and Recontextualizing National Identity”. In Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse , ed. by Paul Chilton, and Christina Schaffner , 143 – 169. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com