Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

İLETİŞİM ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN İLETİŞİM DOYUMU: İLETİŞİM FAKÜLTELERİNDE OKUYAN ÖĞRENCİLERİN İLETİŞİM DOYUM DÜZEYLERİNİN VE DEĞİŞKENLERİNİN TESPİTİNE YÖNELİK BİR ARAŞTIRMA

COMMUNICATION SATISFACTION OF STUDENTS OF COMMUNICATION: A RESEARCH TO DEFINE COMMUNICATION SATISFACTION LEVEL AND VARIABLES OF STUDENTS OF COMMUNICATION FACULTY

Journal Name:

  • The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies

Publication Year:

  • 2013
DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.9761/JASSS_515

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
It can be said that communication is one of the key criteria of the individual and organizational success. An environment that consists of individuals reaching high level of communication satisfaction level provides a highly motivated work environment. As nowadays there is an intense competition, institutions should create an efficient inter-institution communication environment and enhance communication satisfaction of employees. Faculties of Communication that educate specialists for the communication sector with their high level of communication satisfaction can enhance their organizational success and prepare their students for their career. This study was done in order to determine the communication satisfaction level of students of Faculty of Communications in Turkey. In this content, a questionnaire was made to 504 students from both state and private universities. The surveys are distributed via simple random sampling technique by face to face interview to the participants. It found out that the most important factor which impacts on communication satisfaction of students is communication climate. The other communication factors in the study are- in order of importance- media and communication environment, informing and organizational integration, organizational perspective, supervisory communication, feedback, and horizontal and informal communication. However questionnaire results showed that the communication satisfaction level of the students was medium. In addition, this level could vary according to the opportunities those universities and faculties offer, the sociodemographic and economical qualities of students and students' statues in universities. The average score for communication satisfaction is higher when compared with private university students and government university students in favor of the fist group. Facility and practice/training centers- like media centers, social centers and student facility clubs also have effects to raise communication satisfaction.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bireysel ve kurumsal başarının temel ölçütlerinden birinin iletişim olduğu söylenebilir. Yüksek düzeyde iletişim doyumuna ulaşmış bireylerden oluşan kurumsal iklim, motivasyonu yüksek bir çalışma ortamı sağlamaktadır. Bu bakımdan rekabetin yoğun bir şekilde yaşandığı günümüzde kurumların öncelikli olarak etkin bir kurum içi iletişim ortamı oluşturması ve personelin iletişim doyumunu yükseltmesi gerekmektedir. İletişim sektörüne uzman yetiştiren iletişim fakülteleri de, yüksek düzeydeki iletişim doyumu ile hem kurumsal başarılarını artırabilmekte hem de öğrencilerini mesleğe daha iyi hazırlayabilmektedirler. Bu çalışma Türkiye’de iletişim fakültelerinde okuyan öğrencilerin iletişim doyum düzeylerinin tespitine dönük olarak yapılmıştır. Bu kapsamda 2012 yılı içerisinde devlet ve özel üniversitelerde okuyan 504 öğrenciye anket uygulanmıştır. Anket çalışması basit rastlantısal örneklem yöntemi ile yüz-yüze görüşmeye dayalı olarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmada öğrencilerin iletişim doyum düzeylerini etkileyen en önemli faktörün iletişim iklimi olduğu görülmüştür. Önem sırasına göre diğer iletişim doyum fakörleri ise medya ve iletişim ortamları, bilgilendirme ve kurumsal bütünleşme, kurumsal perspektif, üstlerle iletişim, geribildirim ve yatay iletişim olarak gerçekleşmiştir. Ayrıca çalışmada Türkiye’deki iletişim öğrencilerinin iletişim doyum düzeylerinin genel itibariyle orta düzeyde olduğu ve bu iletişim düzeylerinin üniversite ve fakültelerin sağladığı imkânlar, öğrencilerin ekonomik, sosyo-demografik vb. özellikleri ve okuldaki statülerine göre farklılaşabileceği sonucuna varılmıştır. Özel üniversitelerde okuyan öğrencilerin iletişim doyum ortalamaları devlet üniversitelerine oranla daha yüksek olmuştur. Uygulama birimleri ve öğrenci kulüpleri gibi imkanların sağlanması öğrencilerin iletişim doyumlarını yükseltmektedir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_79201_6_pp_725-749.pdf
  • 1
725-749
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

ALLMAN, Joyce, O’Hair, Dan., ve Stewart, Robert. (1994). ‚Communication and
Aging: A Study of the Effects of Cohort-centrism and Perceived Decoding
Ability on Communication Competence and Communication Satisfaction‛.
Communication Quaterly 42(4): 363-378.
AZİZ, Aysel. (2010). İletişime Giriş. İstanbul: Hiperlink Yayınları.
Barutçugil, İsmet (2004). Stratejik insan Kaynakları Yönetimi. İstanbul: Kariyer
Yayıncılık.
CENGİZ, Aytül Ayşe. (2000). ‚Enformasyon Çağında Örgüt Bağlılığını Geliştirmenin
Yollarına Genel Bir Bakış‛. Anadolu Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 16(1-2): 509-538.
CLAMPITT, Philip. G. & Downs, Cal W. (1993). ‚Employee Perceptions Of The
Relationship Between Communication And Productivity‛. Journal of Business
Communication 30: 5-28.
CÜCELOĞLU, Doğan. (1993). Yeniden İnsan İnsana. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
DOWNS, Cal. & Hazen, Michael. (1977). ‚A Factor Analytic Study of Communication
Satisfaction‛. The Journal Of Business Communication, 14(3): 63-73.
DOWNS, Adrian. (1991). ‚A Case Study Of The Relationship Between
Communication Satisfaction And Organizational Commitment In Two
Australian Organizations‛. Unpublished Master's Thesis, University Of Kansas.
DURAN, Robert. L. & Zakahi, Walter. R. (1988). ‚The Influence of Communicative
Competence Upon Roommate Satisfaction‛, Western Journal of Speech
Communication 52: 135-146
747
Özlem GÜLLÜOĞLU - Hasan GÜLLÜPUNAR
ERIC, M. Eisenberg.; Richard, V. Farace.; Peter, R. Monge.; Erwin, P. Bettinghaus.;
Ronnie, Kurchner-Hawkins.; Katherine, I. Miller., & Lynda, Rothman.(1985).
‚Communication Linkages in Interorganizational Systems‛, In M. Voight & B.
Dervin (Eds.), Progress in communication science, pp. 231-261, Norwood: NJ:
Ablex.
EROĞLU, Erhan ve Özkan, Gülden. (14-16 Mayıs, 2008) ‚Analyzing The Relationship
Between The ‘Organizational Culture’ and ‘Organizational Satisfaction’ And
An Application In Eskişehir Woodlands Administration‛, 6th International
Symposium Communication In The Millennium, İstanbul.
GÖKÇE, Orhan. (1993). İletişim Bilimine Giriş. Konya: Turhan Kitabevi.
GÜLLÜOĞLU, Özlem. (2011). Örgütsel İletişim: İletişim Doyumu ve Kurumsal
Bağlılık. Konya: Eğitim Akademi Yayınları.
HECHT, Michael L. (1978a). ‚Toward a Conceptualization of Communication
Satisfaction‛. Quaterly Journal of Speech 64: 47-62.
HECHT, Michael L. (1978b). ‚Measures of Communication Satisfaction‛. Human
Communication Research 4(4): 350-368.
HOSMER, LaRue H. (1994). ‚Why be moral? A Different Rationale for Managers‛.
Business Ethics Quarterly 4(2): 191-204.
ISHII, Kumi (2005). ‚The Human Side of the Digital Divide: Media Experience as the
Border of Communication Satisfaction with e-mail‛. Technical Writing and
Communication 35(4): 385-402.
IŞIK, Metin. ve Biber Levent (2006). ‚İletişim, İletişim Süreci ve İletişim Çeşitleri‛. M.
Işık (Ed), Genel ve Teknik İletişim (pp. 1-39) Konya: Eğitim Yayınevi.
KALAYCI, Şeref. (2006). ‚Faktör Analizi‛. Ş. Kalaycı (ed), SPSS Uygulamalı Çok
Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri (s. 331-331) Ankara: Asil Yayınları.
KONGCHAN, Ananchai (1985). ‚Communication Satisfaction, Job Satisfaction and
Organizational Commitment of Business College Faculty‛. Unpublicated
Doctoral Disertation. Arizona State University Business Administartion, Tempe,
UMI Disertation Service.
KRAM, Kathy E. & Isabella, Lynn (1985). ‚Mentoring Alternatives: The Role of Peer
Relationships in Career Development‛. Academy of Management Journal 28(1):
110-132.
KRAMER, Michael (2004). Managing Uncertainty in Organizational Communication.
Mahwah: NJ Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Communication Satisfaction of Students of Communication: A Research to Define Communication
Satisfaction Level and Variables of Students of Communication Faculty
748
LEE, Sang M. (1971). ‚An Empirical Analysis of Organizational Identification‛.
Academy of Management Journal 8(2): 114-120.
LILY, Oei. (1999). An Action Research On Improving Communication Satisfaction
Among Teachers In A Local Secondary School. Unpublicated Doctoral
Disertation, University of Hong Kong, UMI Disertation Service.
MCCOMAS, Katherina A. (2003). ‚Citizen Satisfaction with Public Meetings Used for
Risk Communication‛. Journal of Applied Communication Research 31(2): 164-
184.
MEINTJES, Corné. & Benita, Steyn (2006). ‚A Critical Evaluation of the Downs-Hazen
Instrument (CSQ) by Measuring employee Communication Satisfaction at a
Private Higher Educatıon Instıtutıon in South Africa‛. Communication Volume
32(I): 152-188.
MOHR, J. Jakki & Sohi, Ravipreet (1995). ‚Communication Flows in Distribution
Channels: Impact on Assesment of Communication Quality and Satisfaction‛.
Journal of Retailing 71(4): 393-416.
NUSS, D. Mark. (1996). ‚A Longitudinal Case Study of Organizational Commitment and
Communication Satisfaction ın a Police Department‛. Web site:
http://sunzi1.lib.hku.hk/ER/detail/cof/4206093, Accessed: 28 September 2009.
OKAY, Aydemir ve Okay, Ayla. (2009). ‚An Analytic of Communication Satisfaction
In The Turkish Postal Service‛. Selçuk İletişim Dergisi 6(1): 51-66.
PACE, R. Wayne & Faules, Don F. (1989). Organizational Communication, Englewood
Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
PINCUS, J. David. (1986). ‚Communication Satisfaction, Job Satisfaction, and Job
Performance‛. Human Communication Research 12(3): 395-419.
POLANKSY, Benjamin, J. (1993). An Examination of Communication Satisfaction
And Communication Competence in Three Professional Technical
Organizations. Unpublicated Doctoral Disertation, University of Kansas, UMI
Disertation Service.
REDDING, W. Charles (1972). Communication within the Organization: An Interpretative
Review of Theory and Research. New York: Industrial Communication Council.
RUPPEL, Cynthia P. & Harrington, Susan J (2000). ‚The Relationship Of
Communication, Ethical Work Climate, and Trust to Commitment And
Innovation‛. Journal Of Business Ethics 25(4): 313-328.
SEFTON, Lori Ann. (1999). Does Increased Employee Participation Affect Job
Satisfaction, Communication Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment? A
Qualitative Study Incorporating Views of Both Management and Non-
Management. Unpublicated Doctoral Disertation, Department of Speech
749
Özlem GÜLLÜOĞLU - Hasan GÜLLÜPUNAR
Communication in the graduate School Illınois University, UMI Disertation
Service.
STEWART L. Tubbs & Moss, Sylvia (1977). Human Communication. U.S.A: Atlanta
Book Company
SYPHER, Bevely Davenport. (1984). ‚The Importance of Social Cognitive Abilities In
Orhanizations‛. R.H. Bostrom (Ed.). Competence In Communication: A
Multidisciplinary Approach (pp.103-127 ), Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
TAŞÇI, Deniz ve Eroğlu, Erhan (2008). ‚Kurumsal İletişim Kalitesinin Oluşmasında
Yöneticilerin Geribildirim Verme Becerilerinin Etkisi‛. Selçuk İletişim Dergisi
5(2): 26-34.
TSENG, Hsing Yu. (2006). Communication Factors which Promote Employee’s Job
Satisfaction in Taiwan High-Tech Industry. Unpublicated M.A Disertation,
University of Hong Kong, UMI Disertation Service, The Graduate Faculty of
the University of Akron.
VARONA, Federico. (2002). ‚Conceptualization and Management of Communication
Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment in Three Guatemalan
Organizations‛. American Communication Journal, 5(3): web site:
http://acjournal.org/holdings/vol5/iss3/articles/concept.htm.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com