Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

STUDENT OPINIOINS ABOUT ELECTIVE COURSES IN CHANGING EDUCATION: THE EXAMPLE OF KOCAELI UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF EDUCATION

Journal Name:

  • Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in the World

Publication Year:

  • 2012

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Bologna Process, which aims to make higher education institutions comparable with each other without changing their peculiarities, has been experienced at universities. This process includes reconstruction and quality in education. This study aims to determine the student preferences related to out-of-field elective courses that will enrich students’ occupational and personal development and to state the reasons for their preferences. An online questionnaire was prepared and the students were asked to complete this questionnaire. The findings of this study suggest that candidate teachers need elective courses in the fields of art, first aid and health knowledge, information and communication technologies, communication skills, psychology and sports during their occupational and personal development processes.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-student-opinioins-about-elective-courses-changing-education-example-kocaeli-university-faculty-education.pdf
  • 4
135-142
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Bandura, A. (1999). Self-Efficacy in Changing Societies. Cambridge: The Press Syndicate of the University of
Cambridge.
Erçetin, Ş. (2001). Biz Akademisyenler Geleceğin Yüksek Öğretim Kurumlarını Yaratmaya Hazır mıyız? Kuram ve
Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 25. s.75-86.
Gottfried, A.E. (1990). Academic intrinsic motivation in young elementary school children. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 82, 525-538.
Güven, İ. (2001). Öğretmen Yetiştirmenin Uluslar arası Boyutu. UNESKO 45. Uluslararası Eğitim Kongresi,
Ankara, Milli Eğitim Yayınları.
Karslı, M.C., Yıldız, K., Akgün, N. Ve Cerit, Y. (2001). Yeni Yönetim Teorilerinin Bazı Kavramları Açısından Eğitim
Fakültelerinin Akreditasyonu Uygulamasının Analitik Olarak Değerlendirilmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim
Yönetimi, 7, (27).
Lepper,M.R.,Corpus,JiI.,&Iyengar,S.S.(2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom:
Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, IS4-196.
Miles, M. B., ve Huberman, A. M. (1994). “Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook”, SAGE.
NVivo qualitative data analysis software. (2010). QSR International Pty Ltd. Version 9.
Ormrod, J.E. (2008). Human learning (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Özden, Y. (1999). Eğitimde Yeni Değerler, Ankara. Pegem Yayıncılık.
Sezal, İ. ve Erkan, S., (1997). XXI. Yüzyıl Öğretmeni, Uluslararası Dünya Öğretmen Eğitimi Konferansı, 27
Ağustos-2 Eylül 1995. Ankara MEB Yayınları.
Sözer, E., (1991). Türk Üniversitelerinde Öğretmen Yetiştirme Programlarının Öğretmenlik Davranışlarını
Kazandırma Yönünden Etkililiği. Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 4 (1-2), 103-120.
YÖK (1998). Eğitim Fakültesi Öğretmen Yetiştirme Lisans Programları. Ankara.
Schunk,D.H.,Pintrich,PJl., ve Meece,JL.(2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research and Applications (3rd
ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill.
Tabassam, W. and Grainger, J. (2002). Self-Concept, Attributional Style and Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Students with
Learning Disabilities with and without Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25,
p. 142-145
Tipton, R.M. and Worthington, E.L. (1984). The Measurement of Generalized Self-Efficacy: A Study of Construct
Validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(5), p.545-548.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com