Buradasınız

THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF TURKISH VERSION OF THE ASSETS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD SCALE

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
The aim of this study is to examine validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Assets in the Neighborhood Scale (Oliva, Antolin, & Lopez, 2011). The sample of this study consisted of 250 high school students. The results of confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the 22 items and five-dimensional assets in the neighborhood model (Support and empowerment of youth, Attachment to the neighborhood, Security, Social control, and Availability of youth activities) was well fit (x²= 311.40, df= 198, RMSEA= .047, GFI= .90, CFI= .93, IFI= .94, and SRMR= .060). The internal consistency reliability coefficients of the scale were .83 for support and empowerment of youth subscale, .86 for attachment to the neighborhood subscale, .67 for security subscale, .70 for social control subscale, .51 for availability of youth activities subscale, and .88 for overall scale. The corrected item-total correlations ranged from .18 to .70. Overall findings demonstrated that this scale had high validity and reliability scores.
1
5

REFERENCES

References: 

Black, J. L., & Macinko, J. (2008). Neighborhoods and obesity. Nutrition Reviews, 66(1), 2-20.
Boardman, J. D., Finch, B. K., Ellison, C. G., Williams, D. R., & Jackson, J. S. (2001). Neighborhood disadvantage, stress, and drug use among adults. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 42(2), 151-165.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1989). Ecological systems theory, in Vasta, R. (ed.) Annals of child development – six theories of child development: Revised formulations and current Issues (pp. 1-103). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Burton, L. M., Price-Spratlen, T., & Spencer, M. B. (1997). On ways of thinking about measuring neighborhoods: Implications for studying context and developmental outcomes for children. In J. Brooks-Gunn, G. J. Duncan, & J. L. Aber (Eds.), Neighborhood poverty: context and consequences for children. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Cubbin, C., Hadden, W. C., & Winkleby, M. A. (2001). Neighborhood context and cardiovascular disease risk factors: The contribution of material deprivation. Ethnicity & Disease, 11(4), 687-700.
Diez Roux, A. V. D., Merkin, S. S., Arnett, D., Chambless, L., Massing, M., Nieto, F. J., & Watson, R. L. (2001). Neighborhood of residence and incidence of coronary heart disease. New England Journal of Medicine, 345(2), 99-106.
Harding, D. J. (2003). Counterfactual models of neighborhood effects: The effect of neighborhood poverty on dropping out and teenage pregnancy. American Journal of Sociology, 109(3), 676-719.
Kim, D. (2008). Blues from the neighborhood? Neighborhood characteristics and depression. Epidemiologic Reviews, 30(1), 101-117.
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND INSTRUCTIONAL STUDIES
IN THE WORLD
August 2014, Volume: 4 Issue: 3 Article: 01 ISSN: 2146-7463
Copyright © International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications / www.ijonte.org
5
Mair, C., Diez Roux, A., & Galea, S. (2008). Are neighborhood characteristics associated with depressive symptoms? A review of evidence. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 62(11), 940-946.
Moen, P., Elder, G., & Lüscher, K. (1995). Examining lives in context: Perspectives on the ecology of human development. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Oliva, A., Antolin, L., & Lopez, A. M. (2011). Development and Validation of a Scale for the Measurement of Adolescents’ Developmental Assets in the Neighborhood. Social Indicators Research, 106, 563-576.
Wight, R. G., Cummings, J. R., Karlamangla, A. S., & Aneshensel, C. S. (2010). Urban neighborhood context and change in depressive symptoms in late life. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 64(2), 247-251.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com