Buradasınız

Sustainable practices in urban freight distribution in Bilbao

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2011.v4n3.p538-553
Abstract (2. Language): 
Purpose: The objective of the present study is to select some feasible and sustainable logistic practices in order to improve the urban freight distribution in Bilbao city. Design/methodology/approach: After a thorough literature review and a benchmarking, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) techniques were used in order to support the decision making processes in order to select the most interesting practices. The criteria used for this selection were based on four factors: (1) improvement of the city freight distribution, (2) implementation possibility, (3) short and medium term applicability and (4) impact on the citizens of Bilbao. Findings: The paper identifies some specific problems that must be faced during the last stage of the logistics chain, where products are usually delivered to final customers in the urban environment. Research limitations/implications: Not all good urban freight distribution practices can be applied universally to all types of towns. Therefore, it is necessary to design some practices specifically to each particular city according to the physical characteristics of the city, the companies’ motivation and the citizens’ habits. Practical implications: All the agents involved in the city freight distribution should be aware of the benefits and problems that their actions cause. Originality/value: This study was carried out from a wide perspective that included researchers, logistics operators and local authorities.
538-553

REFERENCES

References: 

Ambrosini, C., & Routhier, J.L. (2004). Objectives, Methods and Results of Surveys Carried out in the Field of Urban Freight Transport: An International Comparison. Transport Reviews: A Transnational Transdisciplinary Journal, 24(1), 57-77.
Balsas, C. (2001). Commerce and the European City Center: Modernization, Regeneration and Management. European Planning Studies, 9(5), 677-682.
Browne, M., Nemoto, T., Visser, J., & Whiteing, T. (2004). Urban freight movements and public-private partnerships. Paper presented at Third International Conference on City Logistics, Madeira.
Browne, M., Sweet, M., Woodburn, A., & Allen, J. (2005). Urban Freight Consolidation Centres Final Report. University of Westminster.
Dablanc, L. (2008). Urban Goods Movement and Air Quality Policy and Regulation Issues in European Cities. Oxford Journal of Environmental Law, 20(2), 245-266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqn005
European Commission. (2007). Green paper: Towards a new culture for urban mobility. http://www.ec.europa.eu/transport/urban/urban_mobility/urban_mobility_en... - Accessed 11th April 2011.
Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management - http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2011.v4n3.p538-553
- 553 -
Gill, L.E., & Allerheiligen, R.P. (1996). Cooperation in channels of distribution: physical distribution leads the way. International Journal of Physical distribution & Logistics, 26(5), 49-63.
Holguín-Veras, J., & Paaswell, R.E. (2000). New York Regional Intermodal Freight Transportation Planning: Institutional Challenges. Transportation Law Journal, 27(3), 453-473.
Lehmbrock, M., Spott, M., & Beckmann, K.J. (2007). Sustainable Urban Transport and deprived urban areas -Good Practice Examples in Europe. Berlin: German Institute of Urban Affairs.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com