Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Developing TOPSIS method using statistical normalization for selecting Knowledge management strategies

Journal Name:

  • Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management

Publication Year:

  • 2013

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Purpose: Numerous companies are expecting their knowledge management (KM) to be performed effectively in order to leverage and transform the knowledge into competitive advantages. However, here raises a critical issue of how companies can better evaluate and select a favorable KM strategy prior to a successful KM implementation. Design/methodology/approach: An extension of TOPSIS, a multi-attribute decision making (MADM) technique, to a group decision environment is investigated. TOPSIS is a practical and useful technique for ranking and selection of a number of externally determined alternatives through distance measures. The entropy method is often used for assessing weights in the TOPSIS method. Entropy in information theory is a criterion uses for measuring the amount of disorder represented by a discrete probability distribution. According to decrease resistance degree of employees opposite of implementing a new strategy, it seems necessary to spot all managers’ opinion. The normal distribution considered the most prominent probability distribution in statistics is used to normalize gathered data. Findings: The results of this study show that by considering 6 criteria for alternatives Evaluation, the most appropriate KM strategy to implement in our company was ‘‘Personalization’’. Research limitations/implications: In this research, there are some assumptions that might affect the accuracy of the approach such as normal distribution of sample and community. These assumptions can be changed in future work Originality/value: This paper proposes an effective solution based on combined entropy and TOPSIS approach to help companies that need to evaluate and select KM strategies. In represented solution, opinions of all managers is gathered and normalized by using standard normal distribution and central limit theorem.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon 573-5256-2-pb.pdf
  • 4
860-875
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Belsom, C. (1992). The Normal Distribution. The School Mathematics Project 16-19.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bierly, P., & Chakrabarti, A. (1996). Generic knowledge strategies in the US pharmaceutical
industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17(4), 123-135. http://cat.inist.fr/?
aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=2592598
Casella, G., & Berger, R.L. (1990). Statistical Inference. Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.
Dedecker, J., & Prieur, C. (2007). An empirical central limit theorem for dependent sequences.
Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 117, 121-142.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304414906000895
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spa.2006.06.003
Desouza, K.C. (2003). Strategic contributions of game rooms to knowledge management:
Some preliminary insights. Information and Management, 41(1), 63-74.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378720603000272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(03)00027-2
Hansen, M.T., Nohria, N., & Tierney, T. (1999). What’s your strategy for managing knowledge?
Harvard Business Review, 77(2), 106-126.
Hess, P., & Siciliano, J. (1996). Management: Responsibility for performance. New York:
McGraw-Hill.
Hwang, C.L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications.
Heidelberg: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9
Jaynes, E.T. (1957). Information theory and statistical mechanics. Physical Review, 106(4),
620-630. h ttp://www.weizmann.ac.il/complex/tlusty/courses/InfoInBio/Papers/JaynesInforma... f
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.106.620
Jee, D.H., & Kang, J.K. (2000). A method for optimal material selection aided with decision
making theory. Materials and Design, 21(3), 199-206.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261306999000667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3069(99)00066-7 Kamara, J.M., Anumba, C.J., & Carrillo, P.M. (2002). A clever approach to selecting a
knowledge management strategy. International Journal of Project Management, 20(3),
205-211.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263786301000709
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00070-9
Karacapilidis, N., Adamides, E., & Evangelou, C. (2006). A computerized knowledge
management system for the manufacturing strategy process. Computers in Industry, 57,
178-188. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166361505001399
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2005.07.001
Leung, L.C., Hui, Y.V., & Zheng, M. (2003). Analysis of compatibility between interdependent
matrices in ANP. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54(7), 758-768.
http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jors/journal/v54/n7/full/2601569a.html
http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601569
Martensson, M. (2000). A critical review of knowledge management as a management tool.
Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(3), 204-216. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?
issn=1367-3270&volume=4&issue=3&articleid=883705&show=abstract
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13673270010350002
Milani, A.S., Shanian, A., Madoliat, R., & Nemes, J.A. (2005). The effect of normalization norms
in multiple attribute decision making models: A case study in gear material selection.
Structural Multidisciplinary Optimization, 29(4), 312-318.
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00158-004-0473-1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00158-004-0473-1
Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative
analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445-455.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221703000201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1
Plessis, M. (2005). Drivers of knowledge management in the corporat environment.
International Journal of Information Management, 25(3), 193-202. http://cat.inist.fr/?
aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=16859501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2004.12.001
Pratyyush, S., & Jian-Bo, Y. (1998). Multiple Criteria Decision Support in Engineering Design.
Berlin: Springer Verlag.
Saremi, M., Mousavi, S.F., & Sanayei, A. (2009). TQM consultant selection in SMEs with TOPSIS
under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 2742-2749.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417408000766
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.01.034 Shannon, C.E. (1948). The mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical
Journal, 27, 379-423. http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/ms/what/shannonday/shannon1948.pdf
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
Shih, H.S, Syur, H.J, & Lee, E.S. (2007). An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making.
Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 45, 801-813.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895717706003025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2006.03.023
Starr, M.K., & Zeleny, M. (1977). Multiple Criteria Decision Making. New York: North Holland
Publication Company.
Yokoyama, R. (1995). On the central limit theorem and law of the iterated logarithm for
stationary processes with applications to linear processes. Stochastic Processes and their
Applications, 59, 343-351. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304414995000389
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-4149(95)00038-9
Yong, D. (2006). Plant location selection based on fuzzy TOPSIS. International Journal of
Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 28(7-8), 839-844.
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00170-004-2436-5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2436-5
Yoon, K.P., & Hwang, C.L. (1995). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Pub.
Yoon, K., & Hwang, C.L. (1980). Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications.
A State of the Art Survey. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
Zanakis, S.H., Solomon, A., Wishart, N., & Dublish, S. (1998). Multi-attribute decision making:
A simulation comparison of select methods. European Journal of Operational Research,
107(3), 507-529. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221797001471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00147-1
Zhonggen, S. (1997). Central limit theorems for random processes with sample paths in
exponential Orlicz spaces. Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 66 , 1-20.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304414996001172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-
4149(96)00117-2

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com