Buradasınız

Carbon Footprint and Order Quantity in Logistics

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jiem.1031
Abstract (2. Language): 
Purpose: Even without economic factors and government regulations, the pressure and motivation of corporation to reduce emissions are still increasing. This is because the key factors for corporation to reduce emissions have been corporate social responsibility and increasing awareness of low carbon among consumers and society not economic trade-off and stringent government regulations. So, the purpose of this paper is to provide quantity methods for the logistics organizations with wish of voluntary reduction and social responsibility to reduce emissions through operations adjustment. Design/methodology/approach: Being difference from the traditional research that takes economic value as objective and carbon footprint as constraint or another source of economic cost, this paper takes carbon footprint as objective directly, order quantity as decision variable. By referring to the traditional economic order quantity model, the paper proposes logistics carbon footprint model which takes transport and inventory into account. Then it solves the model by calculating the values of order quantity, carbon footprint and revenue using the method of optimization. Findings: By solving and comparing the two models, economic order quantity model and carbon footprint model, it gets some results, such as carbon optimization order quantity, the effects of order quantity deviating from economic or carbon order quantity on economic or carbon footprint values, which can give some meaningful insights for corporation to look for reduction opportunities by operations adjustment. Originality/value: The study takes carbon footprint as objective directly and creates the corresponding quantity model. By comparing with the traditional economic order quantity model, it can provide quantity methods and some meaningful insights for the logistics organizations to reduce emissions.
475
490

REFERENCES

References: 

Arslan, M.C., & Turkay, M. (2010). EOQ Revisited with Sustainability Considerations. Working
paper.
Battini, D., Persona, A., & Sgarbossa, F. (2013). A Sustainable EOQ Model: theoretical
formulation and applications. International Journal of Production Economics, available online
15 August 2013.
Bear ing Po int , 4th Supply Chain Moni to r, 2010-2011, avai lable onl ine at
http://www.bearingpointconsulting.com/de-de/download/TAP-SC_EN.pdf (date of last access October 6th,
2013).
Benjaafar, S., Yanzhi, L., & Daskin, M. (2013). Carbon Footprint and the Management of Supply
Chains: Insights From Simple Models. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and
Engineering, 10(1), 99-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2012.2203304
Blengini, G.A., & Shields, D.J. (2010). Green Labels and Sustainability Reporting. Management
of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 21(4), 477–493.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14777831011049115
Bouchery, Y., Ghaffari, A., Jemai, Z., et al. (2012). Including sustainability criteria into
inventory model s . European Journal of Operational Research, 222(2), 229-240.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.05.004
Cachon, G.P. (2013). Retail store density and the cost of greenhouse gas emissions. Working
paper.
Carlsson, J.G., & Jia, F. (2012). Minimizing emissions in facility location. University of
Minnesota working paper.
Caro, F., Charles, J.C., & Tan, T., & Rob, Z. (2011). Carbon-Option and Carbon-Neural Supply
Chains. Working paper. http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5878
Chen, X., Benjaafar, S., & Elomri, A. (2012). The carbon-constrained EOQ. Operations
Research Letters, 41(2), 172-179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.orl.2012.12.003
Daganzo (2010). Logistics systems analysis. Beijing. Publishing house of electronics industry.
Hoen, K.M.R., Tan, T., Fransoo, J.C., et al. (2011) . Effect of carbon emission regulations on
transport mode selection in supply chains. Eindhoven University of Technology.
Hua, G., Cheng, T.C.E., & Wang, S. (2011). Managing carbon footprints in inventory
management. International Journal of Production Economics, 132(2), 178-185.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.03.024
Lieb, K.J., & Lieb, R.C. (2010). Environmental sustainability in the third-party logistics (3PL)
industry. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 40(7),
524-533. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09600031011071984
Tian, Y., & Yang, M. (2013). Demonstration analysis for the low-carbon factors index system of
logistics enterprises. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 6(1), 297-307.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jiem.681
Wakeland, W., Sears, L., & Venkat, K. (2009). Measuring the Effects of Carbon Footprint
Training on Consumers. Sustainability: The Journal of Record, 2(1), 45–52.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/SUS.2009.9900

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com