Buradasınız

Choosing R&D or Advertising for Competing Firms in Uncertain Market

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jiem.1052
Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Purpose: R&D and advertising have become important means to enhance the competitiveness of firms’ products. Design an appropriate model to help the firm to make the right choice is value in supply chain. Design/methodology/approach: In considering that whether the market is completely covered or not, we build the strategy selection model for R&D and advertising for two competing firms and solve the optimal strategy. Findings: The research results show that when a firm does not take any measures to enhance competitiveness, another firm will neither. However when one takes measures to improve the competitiveness, another will do so, also. When two firms must choose one measure to improve the competitiveness, either in full-covered market or not full-covered market, the two firms will not choose to do advertising in step, even if the firms do not have to pay additional cost in advertising. Originality/value: In the game model, the firm could compare the own profit in different strategies. According to the above model, the firm choose the right strategy to make the profit maximize in a vertically differentiated market. And when the firm make the choice, it must think about other primary elements such as market.
716
732

REFERENCES

References: 

Anderson, E.T., & Simester, D. (2013). Advertising in a Competitive Market: The Role of
Product Standards, Customer Learning, and Switching Costs. Journal of Marketing Research,
50(4), 489-504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmr.11.0538
Baye, M.R., & Morgan, J. (2009). Brand and price advertising in online markets. Management
Science, 55(7), 1139-1151.
Dutta, S., Narasimhan, O., & Rajiv, S. (1999). Success in high-technology markets: Is
marketing capability critical? Marketing Science, 18(4), 547-568.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.18.4.547
Fosfuri, A., & Giarratana, M.S. (2009). Masters of War: Rivals' Product Innovation and New
Advertising in Mature Product Markets. Management Science, 55(2), 181-191.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1080.0939
Gardete, P.M. (2013). Cheap-Talk Advertising and Misrepresentation in Vertically Differentiated
Markets. Marketing Science, 32(4), 609-621. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2013.0772
Grossmann, V. (2008). Advertising, in-house R&D, and growth. Oxford Economic Papers-New
Series.
Hotelling, H. (1929). Stability in Competition. The Economic Journal, 39(153), 41-57.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2224214
Mizik, N., & Jacobson, R. (2003). Trading off between value creation and value appropriation:
The financial implications of shifts in strategic emphasis. Journal of Marketing, 67(1), 63-76.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.67.1.63.18595
Ofek, E., & Sarvary, M. (2003). R&D, marketing, and the success of next-generation products.
Marketing Science, 22(3), 355-370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.22.3.355.17742
Sosa, M.L. (2009). Application-Specific R&D Capabilities and the Advantage of Incumbents:
Evidence from the Anticancer Drug Market. Management Science, 55(8), 1409-1422.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1027
Steenkamp, J., & Fang, E. (2011). The Impact of Economic Contractions on the Effectiveness of
R&D and Advertising: Evidence from US Companies Spanning Three Decades. Marketing
Science, 30(4), 628-645. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1110.0641
Xu, Y., Gurnani, H., & Desiraju, R. (2010) Strategic supply chain structure design for a
proprietary component manufacturer. Production and Operations Management, 19(4),
371-389. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2009.01116.x

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com