Buradasınız

Integration of simulation and DEA to determine the most efficient patient appointment scheduling model for a specific healthcare setting

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jiem.1058
Abstract (2. Language): 
Purpose: This study is to develop a systematic approach for determining the most efficient patient appointment scheduling (PAS) model for a specific healthcare setting with its characteristics of multiple appointments requests in order to increase patients’ accessibility, improve resource utilization, and reduce operation cost. In this study, three general appointment scheduling models, centralized scheduling model (CSM), decentralized scheduling model (DSM), and hybrid scheduling model (HSM), are considered. Design/methodology/approach: This study integrates discrete event simulation and data envelopment analysis (DEA) to determine the most efficient PAS model. Simulation analysis is used to obtain the outputs of different configurations of PAS, and the DEA based on the simulation outputs is applied to select the best configuration in the presence of multiple and contrary performance measures. The best PAS configuration provides an optimal balance between patient satisfaction, schedulers’ utilization, and the cost of the scheduling system and schedulers’ training. Findings: The case study shows that in the presence of high proportion (more than 70%) of requests for multiple appointments, CSM is the best PAS model. If the proportion of requests for multiple appointments is medium (25%-50%), HSM is the best. Finally, if the proportion of requests for multiple appointments is low (less than 15%), DSM is the best. If the proportion is in the interval from 15% to 25% the selected PAS model can be either DSM or HSM based on expert idea. Similarly, if the proportion is in the interval from 50% to 70% the best PAS model can be either CSM or HSM. Originality/value: This is the first study that determines the best PAS model for a particular healthcare setting. The proposed approach can be used in a variety of healthcare settings.
785
815

REFERENCES

References: 

Agnihotri, S., & Taylor, P. (1991). Staffing a centralized Appointment Scheduling Department in
Lourdes Hospital. Interfaces, 21(5), 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.21.5.1
Al-Refaie, A., Fouad, R.H., Li, M.H., & Shurrab, M. (2014). Applying simulation and DEA to
improve performance of emergency department in a Jordanian hospital. Simulation Modelling
Practice and Theory, 41, 59-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2013.11.010
Avkiran, N. (2001). Investigating Technical and Scale Efficiencies of Australian Universities
through Data Envelopment Analysis. Socioeconomic Planning Sciences, 35(1), 57-80.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0121(00)00010-0
Berry, J., & Phanthasomchit, S. (2000). Centralized and Decentralized Scheduling Using HL7.
Canadian Institute of Health Information.
Cooper, W., Seiford, L.M., & Tone, K. (2006). Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis and
its usesa. New York: Springer Science Business Media.
Ertay, T., & Ruan, D. (2005). Data envelopment analysis based decision model for optimal
operator allocation in CMS. European Journal of operational Research, 164(3), 800-810.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.01.038
Ertay, T., Ruan, D., & Tuzkaya, U.R. (2006). Integrating data envelopment analysis and analytic
hierarchy for the facility layout design in manufacturing systems. Information Science,
176(3), 237-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2004.12.001
Guo, M., Wagner, M., & West, C. (2004). Outpatient Clinic Scheduling- A Simulation Approach.
Proceedings of the 36th Conference On Winter Simulation, 1981-1987.
Gupta, D., & Denton, B. (2008). Appointment scheduling in health care: Challenges and
opportunities. IIE transactions, 40(9), 800-819. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07408170802165880
Hooten, M.E., & U.S. ARMY Academy of Health Sciences. (1990). An effective outpatient
appointment system for General Leonard Wood Army Community Hospital. Master’s Thesis.
A v a i l a b l e a t : http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?
Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf&AD=ADA237807
Jacobson, S.H., Hall, S.N., & Swisher, J.R. (2013). Discrete-event simulation of health care
systems. In Patient Flow, pp. 273-309. Springer US. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9512-3_12
Lai, M.C., Huang, H.C., & Wang, W.K. (2010). Designing a knowledge-based system for
benchmarking: A DEA approach. Knowledge-Based Systems, 24(5), 1-10.
Li, X.B., & Reeves, G.R. (1999). A multiple criteria approach to data envelopment analysis.
European Journal of Operational Research, 115(3), 507-517. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-
2217(98)00130-1
Mustafee, N., Katsaliaki, K., & Taylor, S. J. (2010). Profiling literature in healthcare simulation.
Simulation, 86(8-9), 543-558. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0037549709359090
Nealon, J., & Moreno, A. (2003). Agent-Based Application in Health Care. In Applications of
Software Agent Technology in the Health Care Domain, pp. 3-18. Birkhäuser Basel.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-7976-7_2
Ozcan, Y.A. (2008). Health care benchmarking and performance evaluation: An assessment
using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), Vol. 120. New York: Springer Verlag.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-75448-2
Peng, Q., Niu, Q., & ElMekkawy, T.Y. (2013). Improvement in the Operating Room Efficiency
Using Tabu Search in Simulation. Business Process Management Journal, 19(5), 3-3.
Shim, S.J., & Kumar, A. (2010). Simulation for emergency care process reengineering in
hospitals. Business Process Management Journal, 16(5), 795-805.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14637151011076476
Venkatesh, B. (2006). Technical Efficiency Measurement by Data Envelopment Analysis: An
Application in Transportation. Alliance Journal of Business Research, 2(1), 60-72.
Weng, S.J., Tsai, B.S., Wang, L.M., Chang, C.Y., & Gotcher, D. (2011, December). Using
simulation and data envelopment analysis in optimal healthcare efficiency allocations.
In Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 1295-1305. Winter Simulation
Conference.
Yang, T., & Kuo, C. (2003). A hierarchical AHP/DEA methodology for the facility layout design
problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 147(1), 128-136.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00251-5
Zhang, J., Dharmadhikari, N., & Song, D. (2009). Literature Review on Centralized and
Decentralized Scheduling. Fargo, ND: Department of Industrial and Manufacturing
Engineering.
Zhang, J., Gonela, V., & Aslani, N. (2010). Develop a decision tool for a hospital/clinic setting
to decisde whether to schedule in a Centralized or Decentralized manner. Fargo, ND:
Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, NDSU.
Zhang, J., Gonela, V., & Aslani, N. (2011). Development of Centralized, Decentralized and
Hybrid Scheduling Model. Fargo, ND: Department of Industrial and Manufacturing
Engineering, NDSU.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com