Buradasınız

The Impact of Commercial Open Source Software on Proprietary Software Producers and Social Welfare

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jiem.1260
Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Purpose: A growing number of commercial open source software, based on community open source, appears in many segments of the software market. The purpose of this study is to investigate how commercial open source software affects the pricing (market share or profit) of proprietary software producer, consumer surplus and social welfare. Design/methodology: To analyze the impact of commercial open source software on proprietary software producer, this study constructs two vertical-differentiation models: the basic model considers proprietary software only competing with community open source software, and its extended one considers proprietary software competing with both community and commercial open source software. Findings: This study mainly finds that the presence of commercial open source software can lead to the decrease of the software price and profit for proprietary software producer, while the consumer surplus and social welfare will be increased. However, it does not necessarily cause the decline in the market share for proprietary software producer. Originality/value: The main contribution of this study is to examine the effect of commercial open source software on the competitive strategies of proprietary software producer, consumer surplus and social welfare.
1183
1196

REFERENCES

References: 

Chen, H.K., Liu, Y., & Tang, Q. (2011). The impact of network externalities on the competition
between open source and proprietary software. Journal of Management Information Systems,
27(4), 201-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222270407
Choudhary, V., & Zhou, Z.Z. (2007). Impact of competition from open source software on
proprietary software. Working Paper Series No. 08070, China Economics and Management
Academy. http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-4102
Coar, K. (2006). The open source definition (annotated). Available at:
http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.php
CIO. 2002. Open source gains momentum.
Deshpande, A., & Riehle, D. (2008). The total growth of open source. The International
Federation for Information Processing, 275, 197-209.
Dixon, J. (2009). The beekeeper model of commercial open source software. Available at:
http://wiki.pentaho.com/display/BEEKEEPER/The+Beekeeper
Economides, N., & Katsamakas, E. (2006). Two-sided competition of proprietary vs. open
source technology platforms and the implications for the software industry. Management
Science, 52(7), 1057-1071. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0549
Gramstad, A.R. (2014). Piracy in commercial vs. open-source software competition. Working
Paper. Department of Economics, University of Oslo.
Jaisingh, J., See-To, E., & Tam, K. (2008). The impact of open source software on the strategic
choices of firms developing proprietary software. Journal of Management Information
Systems, 25(3), 241-276. http://dx.doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222250307
Kumar, V., Gordon, B., & Srinivasan, K. (2011). Competitive strategy for open source software.
Marketing Science, 30(6), 1066-1078. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1110.0669
Lanzi, D. (2009). Competition and open source with perfect software compatibility. Information
Economics and Policy, 21(3), 192-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2008.11.004
Laurent, L.S. (2004). Understand op e n source and fr e e software licencing. Cambridge,
Massachsusetts: O'Reilly. Available at: https://people.debian.org/~dktrkranz/legal/Understanding
%20Open%20Source%20and%20Free%20Software%20Licensing.pdf
Lee, D., & Mendelson, H. (2008). Divide and conquer: competing with free technology under
n e t wo r k e f f e c t s . Production and Operations Management, 1 7 ( 1 ) , 1 2 - 2 8 .
http://dx.doi.org/10.3401/poms.1070.0005
Lin, L.H. (2008). Impact of user skills and network effects on the competition between open
source and proprietary software. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7(1), 68-81.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2007.01.003
O’Reilly, T. (1999). Lessons from open-source software development. Communications of the
ACM, 42(2), 33-37.
Popp, K.M. (2012). Leveraging open source licenses and open source communities in hybrid
commercial open source business models. Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop
on Software Ecosystems (IWSECO 2012), Boston, MA, USA.
Raghunathan, S., Prasad, A., Mishra, B.K., & Chang, H. (2005). Open source versus closed
source: software quality in monopoly and competitive markets. IEEE Transactions on
Systems Man and Cybernetics Part A Systems and Humans, 35(6), 903-918.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TSMCA.2005.853493
Riehle, D. (2012). The single-vendor commercial open source business model. Information
Systems and e-Business Management, 10(1), 5-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10257-010-0149-x
Software Development Times (2008). Red hat tops list of corporate linux code contributors.
Available at: http://truthhappens.redhat.com/?s=contributor
Sen, R . (2007). A strategic analysis of competition between open source and proprietary
software. Journal of Management Informat ion Systems, 24(1), 238-258.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240107
Widenius, W., & Nyman, N. (2014). The business of open source software: a primer.
Technology Innovation Management Review, 1, 8-11.
Xing, M.Q. (2010a). Proprietary software’s R&D decisions when open source software appears
in a software industry. The International Conference on E-Product, E-Service and
E-Entertainment, 1518-1521.
Xing, M.Q. (2010b). Does open source software decrease profit of proprietary software
producer and increase social welfare. The 2nd International Conference on Information
Science and Engineering (ICISE 2010), 203-206.
Xing, M.Q. (2013). Comparative study on innovation incentives for commercial open source
software under different licenses. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and
Technology, 5(5), 1633-1638.
Zeroukhi, M., & Pénard, T. (2014). Open source software subsidies and network compatibility in
a mixed duopoly. Economics Bulletin, 34(2), 1174-1184.
Zhu, K., & Zhou, Z. (2012). Lock-in strategy in software competition: Open-source software
vs. proprietary software. Information Systems Research, 23(2), 536-545.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.1110.0358

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com