Buradasınız

Carbon Information Disclosure of Enterprises and their Value Creation Through Market Liquidity and Cost of Equity Capital

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jiem.1333
Abstract (2. Language): 
Purpose: Drawing on asymmetric information and stakeholder theories, this paper investigates two mechanisms, namely market liquidity and cost of equity capital, by which the carbon information disclosure of enterprises can benefit their value creation. Design/methodology/approach: In this research, web crawler technology is employed to study the link between carbon information disclosure and enterprises value creation,and the carbon information data are provided by all companies listed in Chinese A-share market Findings: The results show that carbon information disclosure have significant positive influence on enterprise value creation, which is embodied in the relationship between carbon information disclosure quantity, depth and enterprise value creation, and market liquidity and cost of equity capital play partially mediating role in it, while the influence of carbon information disclosure quality and concentration on enterprise value creation are not significant in statistics. Research limitations/implications: This paper explains the influence path and mechanism between carbon information disclosure and enterprise value creation deeply, answers the question of whether carbon information disclosure affects enterprise value creation or not in China.Practical implications: This paper finds that carbon information disclosure contributes positively to enterprise value creation suggests that managers can reap more financial benefits by disclosing more carbon information and investing carbon emissions management. So, managers in the enterprises should strengthen the management of carbon information disclosure behavior. Originality/value: The paper gives a different perspective on the influence of carbon information disclosure on enterprise value creation, and suggests a new direction to understand carbon information disclosure behavior.
137
151

REFERENCES

References: 

Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social
psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Chapple, L., Clarkson, P.M., & Gold, D.L. (2013). The cost of carbon: Capital market effects of
the proposed emission trading scheme (ETS). Abacus, 49(1), 1-33.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/abac.12006
Cormier, D., Ledoux, M., & Magnan, M. (2009). The use of Web sites as a disclosure platform
for corporate performance. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 10(1),
1-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2008.04.002
CuiXiang, T., Yu, L., & Haiou, L. (2012). Discussion carbon disclosure status and improving of
enterprise in China. Business Accounting, 10, 15-17.
Elias, M.B. (2011). The influence of corporate carbon disclosure on investor decisions and
attitudes in South Africa.
Fisher-Vanden, K., & Thorburn, K.S. (2011). Voluntary corporate environmental initiatives and
shareholder wealth. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 62(3), 430-445.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2011.04.003
Griffin, P.A., Lont, D.H., & Sun, Y. (2011). The relevance to investors of greenhouse gas
emission disclosures. UC Davis Graduate School of Management Research Paper, 01-11.
Guoping, T., & Huilong, L. (2011). Environmental information disclosure, investor confidence
and company value. Journal of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, 06, 70-77.
Hsu, A.W., & Wang, T. (2013). Does the market value corporate response to climate change?
Omega, 41(2), 195-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2011.07.009
Lambert, R., Leuz, C., & Verrecchia, R.E. (2007). Accounting information, disclosure, and the
cost of capital. Journal of Accounting Research, 45(2), 385-420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-
679X.2007.00238.x
Lee, S.Y., Park, Y.S., & Klassen, R.D. (2013). Market responses to firms' voluntary climate
change information disclosure and carbon communication. Corporate Social Responsibility
and Environmental Management.
Matsumura, E.M., Prakash, R., & Vera-Muñoz, S.C. (2013). Firm-value effects of carbon
emissions and carbon disclosures. The Accounting Review, 89(2), 695-724.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/accr-50629
Nishitani, K., & Kokubu, K. (2012). Why does the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions
enhance firm value? The case of Japanese manufacturing firms. Business Strategy and the
Environment, 21(8), 517-529. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.734
Saka, C., & Oshika, T. (2014). Disclosure effects, carbon emissions and corporate value.
Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 5(1), 22-45.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-09-2012-0030
Shu, L., Ying, Z., & Qian, T. (2013). Can corporate social responsibility report reduce cost of
equity capital? Accounting Research, 09, 64-70.
Stanny, E. (2013). Voluntary disclosures of emissions by US firms. Business Strategy and the
Environment, 22(3), 145-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.1732
Verrecchia, R.E. (2001). Essays on disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32(1):
97-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00025-8
Vurro, C., & Perrini, F. (2011). Making the most of corporate social responsibility reporting:
Disclosure structure and its impact on performance. Corporate Governance, 11(4), 459-474.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14720701111159280

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com