Buradasınız

ISO 14001:2015: An Improved Tool for Sustainability

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jiem.1298
Abstract (2. Language): 
Purpose: ISO 14001 is an International Standard of worldwide acceptance based on the concept that better environmental performance can be achieved when environmental aspects are systematically identified and managed giving a major contribution to Sustainability, through pollution prevention, improved environmental performance and complying with applicable laws. This paper aims to discuss the Sustainability approach through the use of Environmental Management Standards (EMS), the results achieved by organizations that implement and certify those EMS and a special focus on the current process of ISO 14001:2015 revision and the logic behind it. Design/methodology/approach: Revisiting the concept of Sustainability, the status of ISO 14001, its application benefits and certification and the revision process of ISO 14001:2015 and its expected outcomes are discussed. Findings: This is one of the first attempts to analyze, within the Sustainability framework, the status of the revision of the future ISO 14001:2015 International Standard that will respond to the latest trends and is expected to further improve Environmental performance. It will impact the work of many People and Organizations worldwide, try to responder to both practitioners and academicians inputs and also ensure it is compatible with other management system standards such as ISO 9001. Research limitations/implications: Since the revision standard is not yet finished some changes might happen and some of the remarks expressed in this paper might not be consensual within the Environmental Community. In addition, there are still open questions not yet solved by research that could be revisited when the future ISO 14001:2015 is implemented and the conclusions should be an incentive for future research work. Practical implications: There will be a 3 year transition process for the ISO 14001:2015 certification and major benefits like Environmental Management Systems with less emphasis on documentation and new/reinforced approaches as consideration of organizational context and (relevant) Stakeholders, risk based thinking, life cycle perspective and more emphasis on improving environmental performance. Social implications: The ISO 14001:2015 revision will have major impacts on the more than 300.000 worldwide certified organizations and on the many professionals that work with it. Originality/value: Although 14001:2015 is not yet finished the author thinks organizations will have new tools for environment performance enhancement that also try to answer stakeholders inputs and some of the open research issues concerning EMS implementation, certification and outcomes. The main question is how far ISO/TC 207 can go without alienating the "traditional" user. Major changes should include understanding of the organization’s context in order to better manage risk, emphasis on relevant stakeholders, leadership to promote environmental management, the introduction of the concept of life cycle perspective and a shift towards improving environmental performance.
37
50

REFERENCES

References: 

ACCREDIA-CESQA (2013, November). Indagine ISO 14001: Edizione 2013 dello studio
ACCREDIA – Centro Studi Qualità Ambiene, Università di Padova, sulle organizzazioni italiane
certificate. Retrieved from: http://www.accredia.it/UploadDocs/4415_Indagine_ACCREDIA_CESQA
Boiral, B., & Gendron, Y. (2011). Sustainable development and certification practices: Lessons
learned and prospects. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2 0, 331–347.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.701
Brundtland Commission Report (1987). Our Common Future. United Nations, WECED Report.
Corbett, C.J., & Kirsch D.A. (2001).International diffusion of ISO 14000 certification.
Production and Operations Management, 327-342.
Christmann, P., & Taylor, G. (2006). Firm self-regulation through international certifiable
standards: Determinants of symbolic versus substantive implementation. Journal of
International Business Studies, 37, 863–883. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400231
Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with Forks. The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business.
London: New Society Publishers C.J.
Fonseca, L. (2012). Sustainability/Social Responsibility influence for organizational sustainable
success, PhD Thesis, ISCTE-IUL, 2012.
Fortunski, B. (2008), Does the environmental management standard ISO14001 stimulate
sustainable development? An example from the energy sector in Poland. Management of
Environmental Quality, An International Journal, 19(2), 204-212.
Freeman, R.E.(1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.
González-Benito, J., & González-Benito, O. (2005). An analysis of the relationship between
environmental motivations and ISO 14001 certification. British Journal of Management,
16(2), 133-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00436.x
Heras, I.S, & Boiral, O, (2013), ISO 9001 and ISO 14001: Towards a Research Agenda on
Management System Standards. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(1), 47-65.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00334.x
ISO 14001:2004 (2004). Environmental management system: Requirements with guidance for
use. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
ISO/DIS 14001 (2014). Environmental management system: Requirements with guidance for
use. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
ISO International Organization for Standardization (2014). The ISO Survey 2013. Geneva: ISO
Central Secretariat.
Karapetrovic, S. (2002). Strategies for integration of management systems and standards.
TQM Magazine, 14(1), 61-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09544780210414254
Mori, Y, & Welch, E.G. (2008). The ISO 14001 environmental management standard in Japan:
Results from a national survey of facilities in four industries. Journal of Environmental
Planning and Management, 51(3), 421-445. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09640560801979683
Poksinska, B., Dahlgaard, J.J., & Eklund, J.A.E. (2003). Implementing ISO 14000 in Sweden:
Motives, benefits and comparisons with ISO 9000. International Journal of Quality and
Reliability Management, 20(5), 585-606. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02656710310476543
Sebhatu, S.P., & Enquist, B. (2007). ISO 14001 as a driving force for sustainable development
and value creation. The TQM Magazine, 19(5), 468-482.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09544780710817883
Tarí, J.J., Molina-Azorín, J.F., & Heras, I. (2012). Benefits of the ISO 9001 and ISO 14001
standards: A literature review. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 5(2),
297-322. http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jiem.488
Terlaak, A., & King, A.A. (2006). The effect of certification with the ISO 9000 quality
management standard: A signaling approach. Journal of Economics Behavior & Organization,
60, 579-602. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2004.09.012
Viadiu, F.M., Casadesus, M.F., & Heras, I.S. (2008). ISO 14001 diffusion after the success of
the ISO 9001 model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(8) 1741-1754.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443570610641648
Vries, H.J, de, Bayramoglu, D.K., & Wiele, T., V, der, (2012). Business and Environmental
impact of ISO 14001. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 29(4),
425-435. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02656711211224866
Yin, H.T., & Ma, C.B. (2009). International integration: a hope for a greener China?
International Marketing Review, 26(3), 348-367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02651330910960825
Yin, H., & Schmeidler, P.J. (2009). Why do standardized ISO 14001 environmental
management systems lead to heterogeneous environmental outcomes? Business Strategy
and the Environment, 18, 469-486. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.629
Zeng, S., Shi, J., & Lou, G. (2007). A synergetic model for implementing an integrated an
integrated management system: An empirical study in China. Journal of Cleaner Production,
15(18), 1760-1767. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.03.007

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com