Buradasınız

REKABET VE MEKÂNSAL KURAMLARA İLİŞKİN GENEL BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

THE OVERALL ASSESMENT OF COMPETITION AND SPATIAL THEORIES

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Keywords (Original Language):

Abstract (2. Language): 
The concept of competition basically is undertaken at the firm level yet in recent years competition is restructured globally and its important relationships with various locations has been proposed. The role of location on the performance of enterprises is restructured with the impact of globalization. In recent years, many studies expose an undeniable fact that the growth of the global economy yet this growth is mainly as a result of the reflection of spatial processes that occur at the local level. As a result of increasing the relationship between location and competitiveness and dominating location as the engine of growth and regional development, the role of location has been recognized and the importance spatial theories have increased in the literature.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Rekabet kavramı temelde firma düzeyinde ele alınmakla birlikte son yıllarda kapsamının global düzeyde yeniden yapılandığı ve rekabetin çeşitli mekânlarla önemli ilişkilerinin olduğu ortaya atılmıştır. Küreselleşme ile birlikte “mekânsal rol”’ün işletmelerin performansı üzerindeki etkisinin “yeniden yapılandığı” ortaya atılmıştır. Son yıllarda yapılan birçok araştırmada küresel ekonominin büyümesinin yadsınamaz bir gerçek olduğu ancak bu büyümenin daha çok yerel düzeydeki süreçlerin mekânsal yansımasının bir sonucu olarak ortaya çıktığı vurgulanmaktadır. Rekabetçilikle mekânlar arasındaki ilişkinin artması ile ekonomik gelişim, büyüme ve bölgesel kalkınmanın dinamosu olarak görünen mekân’ın rolü son yıllarda yapılan çalışmalarla tanınıp gündeme taşınmış ve mekânsal kuramların yazındaki önemi artmıştır.
95
114

JEL Codes:

REFERENCES

References: 

Ahuja, G. (2000). “Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: a longitudinal study,”
Administrative Science Quartely 45: 425-455.
Akan, O., Allen, R. S., Helms, M. M., & Spralls, S. A. (2006). “Critical tactics for implementing Porter’s
generic strategies,” Journal of Business Strategy, 27(1), 43- 53.
Alsaç, F. (2010), “Bölgesel Gelişme Aracı Olarak Kümelenme Yaklaşımı ve Türkiye İçin Kümelenme
Destek Modeli Önerisi,” Planlama Uzmanlığı Tezi, DPT, Ankara.
Asheim, B. T. (1994). “Industrial Districts, Inter-firm Co-operation and Endogenous Technological
Development: The Experience of Developed Countries”, in United Nations, Technological
Dynamism in Industrial Districts: An Alternative Approach to Industrialization in Developing
Countries? (New York and Geneva: United Nations), pp. 91-142.
Asheim, B., Cooke P. ve Martin R. (2000). “The rise of the Cluster Concept in Regional Analysis and
Policy: a critical assessment in Clusters and Regional Development,” Routledge, pp: 1-30.
Barney J. (1991). “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage,” Journal of Management, 17,
99-120.
Barney J. (1997). Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage. Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA.
Becattini, G. (1991a). “Italian industrial districts: Problems and perspectives,” International Studies of
Management & Organization, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 83–91.
Becattini, G. (1991b). “The industrial district as a creative milieu”, in G. Benko and M. Dunford (eds.),
Industrial Change and Regional Development: The Transformation of New Industrial Spaces,
London: Belhaven Press, 102-114.
Beceren, E. (2004). “Bölgesel Rekabet Gücü,” Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, C.9, S.2, s.
279-302.
Begg, I. (1999). “Cities and competitiveness,” Urban Studies 36, 795-809.
Begg, I. (2002). Urban Competitiveness: Policies for Dynamic Cities, Bristol: Policy Press.
Christaller, W. (1966). Central Places in Southern Germany, Trans. Carlisle W. Baskins. Englewood
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Cortright, J. (2006). Making Sense of Clusters: Regional Competitiveness and Economic Development,
The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). “The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective
rationality in organizational fields,” American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
Dyer, J.H., & Nobeoka, K. (2000). “Creating and managing high performance knowledge-sharing
network: The Toyota case,” Strategic Management Journal, 21: 345-367.
Gelsing, L. (1992). Innovation and the Development of Industrial Networks, B. Lundvall (ed.), National
Systems of Innovation, London: Pinter Publishers.
Rekabet ve Mekânsal Kuramlara İlişkin Genel Bir Değerlendirme| EROĞLU, YALÇIN
Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi
KAÜ İİBF Dergisi | Cilt 4 * Sayı 6 * Yıl 2013
111
Granovetter, M. (1985). “Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness,” American
Journal of Sociology, 19(3), 481-510.
Grant, R. (1998), Contemporary Strategy Analysis. Blackwell: Malden, MA.
Henderson, J. V. (1986). The efficiency of resource usage and city size, Journal of Urban Economics, Vol.
19: 47-70.
Hill, C. W. L., & Jones G. R. (1989). Strategic Management, An Integrated Approach, Houghton, Mifflin
Company, Boston.
Karaaslan, A., & Tuncer, G. (2010). “Uluslararası Rekabet Gücünün Artırılmasında Temel Politikaları,”
Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, S.26, s. 23-45.
Kibritçioğlu, A. (1996). Uluslararası Rekabet Gücüne Kavramsal Bir Yaklaşım, MPM, Verimlilik Dergisi,
Sayı:3.
Kraatz, M. S. (1998), “Learning by association? Interorganizational networks and adaption to
environmental change,” Academy of Management Journal 41: 621-643.
Krugman, P. (1991). Geography and Trade, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Krugman, P. (1994). “Competitiveness: A Dangerous Obsession”, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 73, No.2, 28-44.
Lösch, A. (1954). The Economics of Location. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Lynch, P. A., Halcro K., Johns N. ve Buick I. (2000). “Developing small and micro-enterprise networks
to build profitable tourist destinations,” Destination Development Conference, ETOUR, Mid-
Sweden University, Ostersund
Malberg, A., Solvell, O. ve Zander, I. (1996). “Spatial clustering, local accumulation of knowledge and
firm competitiveness,” Geografiska Annaler Series B 78B: 85-97.
Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of Economics, London: Macmillan.
Martin, R. L. (2004). Cambridge Econometrics, Ecorys-NEI University of Cambridge, “A Study on
the Factors of Regional Competitiveness”, A draft final report for The European Commission
Directorate-General Regional Policy, European Commission 2004
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). “Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and
ceremony,” American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
Meyer, J. W. (1994). “Rationalized Environments”, Scott, W.Richard ve Meyer, John W. (Ed.), Institutional
Environments and Organizations, Sage Publications, London. s. 28-54.
Nakamura, R. (1985). “Agglomeration Economics in Urban Manufacturing Industries: A Case of Japanese
Cities”, Journal of Urban Economics, 17, p. 109.
National Competitiveness Council, NCC. (2011). Ireland’ Competitiveness Scorecard 2011.
Özgen, H., & Yalçın, A., (2006), Temel İşletmecilik Bilgisi, Adana: Nobel Kitabevi.
Piore, M. J., & Sabel C. (1984). The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity, New York: Basic
Books.
EROĞLU, YALÇIN | The Overall Assesment of Competition and Spatial Theories
Kafkas University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty
KAU EASF Journal | Vol 4 * Issue 6 * Year 2013
112
Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries for Competitors., New
York: The Free Press.
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance., New York:
The Free Press.
Porter, M. E. (1990a). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: The Free Press.
Porter, M. E. (1990b). “The competitive advantage of nations,” Harvard Business Review, March-April:
73-93.
Porter, M. E. (1994). “The role of local competition,” Journal of Economic of Business, 1(1): 35- 9.
Porter, M. E. (1995). “The competitive advantage of the inner city,” Harvard Business Review May/ June,
55-71.
Porter, M. E. (1998a). On competition. Harvard Business School, Massachusetts.
Porter, M. E. (1998b). “Clusters and the new economics of competition,” Harvard Business Review,
November-December: 77-90.
Porter, M. E. (2000a). “Locations, clusters and company strategy,” in G.Clark, M.Feldman and M.Gertler
(eds) The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Porter, M. E. (2000b). “Location, competition and economic development: local clusters in a global
economy,” Economic Development Quarterly, 14(1), February, 15–34.
Porter, M. E. (2001), Regions and the new economics of competition, in A.J. Scott (ed.) Global City-
Regions: Trends, Theory, Policy, Oxford University Press, Oxford
Porter, M. E. (2003). “The economic performance of regions,” Regional Studies, 37, 549-578.
Porter, M. E. (2006). “Question and Answer”. Business Weekly. 21.8.2006, http://www.businessweek.
com/magazine/content/06_34/b3998460.htm, Erişim Tarihi: 24.02.12.
Powell, W.W., Koput, K.W., Smith-Doerr, L. ve Owen-Smith, J. (1999). Network position and firm
performance: Organizational returns to collaboration in the biotechnology industry. In S.B.
Bacharach, S.B. Andrews, & D.Knoke (Eds.), Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 16:
129-159. Greenwich, CT, JAI Press.
Powell, T. C. (2001). “Competitive Advantage: Logical and Philosophical Considerations.” Strategic
Management Journal, 22, 875-888.
Pyke, F., Becattini, G. ve Spengenberger, W. (1990). (eds) Industrial Districts and Inter-Firm Co-operation
in Italy (Geneva: ILO).
Roberts P. (1999). “Product Innovation, Product-Market Competition, and Persistent Profitability in the
U.S. Pharmaceutical Industry,” Strategic Management Journal 20 (7), 655-670.
Rosenfeld, S. A. (2001). Networks Aand Clusters: The Yin and Yang of Rural Development, Exploring
Policy Options for a New Rural America, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
Scott, B., & Lodge, G. (1985). US Competitiveness and the World Economy. Boston: Harvard Business
School Press.
Rekabet ve Mekânsal Kuramlara İlişkin Genel Bir Değerlendirme| EROĞLU, YALÇIN
Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi
KAÜ İİBF Dergisi | Cilt 4 * Sayı 6 * Yıl 2013
113
Shulock, N. B. (1998). “Legislatures: Rational Systems or Rational Myths,” Journal of Public Administration
Research and Theory, Vol. 8, No: 3, s. 299-324.
Thompson, A. A., & Strickland, A. J. (1996). “Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases.” (9th ed.).
USA: Irwin McGraw-Hill.
Tsai, W. (2001). “Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: effects of network position and
absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance,” Academy of Management
Journal 44: 996-1004.
Türker, T. M. (2009). “Rekabetçilik, Ölçüm Metodolojisi ve Türkiye ile AB Ülkeleri Karşılaştırması,”
Marmara Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, C:26, S:1, 55-78
Uzzi, B. (1997). “Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness,”
Administrative Science Quarterly, S.42, s.35-67.
Van D. M. P. (1994). “The Interrelations between Industrial Districts and Technological Capabilities
Development: Concepts and Issues”, in United Nations, Technological Dynamism in Industrial
Districts: An Alternative Approach to Industrialization in Developing Countries? (New York and
Geneva: United Nations), pp. 3-49.
Weber, A. (1929). Theory of the Location of Industries (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
World Economic Forum, (WEF). (2009). The Global Competitiveness Report 2008-2009.
Wren, B. M. (2007). “Channel Structure and Strategic Choice in Distribution Channels,” Journal of
Management Research, 7 (2), 78-86.
Yavan, N. (2006). “Türkiye’de Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımların Lokasyon Seçimi Üzerine Uygulamalı
Bir Araştırma,” Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Coğrafya Anabilim Dalı Beşeri ve
İktisadi Coğrafya Bilim Dalı, Doktora Tezi, Ankara.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com