Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

EPİSTEMOLOJİK İNANIŞLAR VE BUNLARIN ÖĞRENCİLERİN FEN DERSLERİNİ ÖĞRENMESİNE ETKİLERİ

EPISTEMIOLOGIC BELIEVES AND THEIR EFFECTS ON PUPILS SCIENCE EDUCATION

Journal Name:

  • Karadeniz (Black Sea-Çernoye More) Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2010

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
There are an accumulating pile of evidences that the previously epistemological believes of students' mostly may led to poor understanding nature of science. It is well known that during shaping individuals' epistemological believes the inquiry take part as an essential factor. The inquiry included steps such as questioning, making strategies in order to fınd out answers, their analysis and making comment about them. It is generally accepted that the inquiry and find out answers are the main subject of epistemology. In this literatüre review I tried to fınd out how students' present epistemological believes effects their understanding nature of science. It has been recommended that in order to make more understandable nature of science for students, the basic principles of epistemology suggested by Lederman and others should be modifıed according to students' inquiry.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Öğrencilerin mevcut epistemolojik inanışlarının öğrencilerin bilimin doğasını kavramalarında bir kısım sorunlara yol açtığı bilinmektedir. Epistemolojik inanışların şekillenmesinde bireylerin gereksinmeleri ana faktör olarak rol oynar. Gereksinme soru sorma, cevaplarının araştırılması için stratejiler geliştirilmesi ve bunları analiz edilmesi ve yorumlanması basamaklarını içerir. Bu nedenle ihtiyaç duyma ve buna bağlı olarak ortaya çıkan sorulara cevap aranması epistemolojinin esasını oluşturur. Bu çalışmada öğrencilerin mevcut epistemolojik görüşlerinin öğrencilerin bilimin doğasını daha iyi anlaşılabilmeleri için nasıl geliştirilebileceği tartışılmıştır. Buna göre öğrencilerin bilimin doğasını daha iyi kavrayabilmeleri için Lederman vd. tarafından tanımlanan epistemolojinin temel prensiplerinin öğrencilerin bilimin doğasını kavramalarına yardımcı olacak şekilde geliştirilerek tekrar kullanılması önerilmiştir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-epistemolojik-inanislar-bunlarin-ogrencilerin-fen-derslerini-ogrenmesine-etkileri.pdf
  • 4
71-76
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Bruner, J.S. (1961) The act of discovery, Harvard Educational Review, 31 (1), 21-32.
Chinn, C. A. & Malhotra, B.A. (2002) Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Edııcation, 86, 175-218.
Dunbar, K. (1993). Concept discovery in a scientifıc domain. Cognitive Science, 17, 397-434.
Duschl, R. A. & Osborne, J . (2002) Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38, 39-72.
Dewey, R. (1990). The school and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
75
KARADENİZ - BLACK SEA - HEPHOE MOPE
Duschl, R., A., (1990) Restructuring science education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Hofer, B. & Pintrich, P. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knovvledge and knovving and their re 1 at i on to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88-140.
Hogan, K (2000) Exploring a process view of students' knovvledge about the nature of science. Science education, 84 (1), 51-70.
Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002) ınlluence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders' vicvvs of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39 (7), 551-578.
Klahr, D., Dunbar, K., & fay, A.L. (1990) Designing good experiments to test bad hypothesis. In. J. Shrager & P. Langley (Eds.) Computational models of scientifıc discovery and theory formation (pp. 355-401). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman.
Krajcik, J., Blumendfeld, P.C., Marx, R. W., Bass, K.M., & Fredricks, J (1998) Inquiry in project-based science classroom: Initial attempts by middle school students. Journal of the Learning science, 7 (3&4), 313-350.
Kuhn, D., Cheney, R., & Weinstock, M. (2000) The development of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Development, 15, 309-328.
Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schvvartz, R. S. (2002). Vievvs of nature of science questionnaire (VNOS): Tovvard valid and meaningful assessment of learners. conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497-521.
McComas, W.F. (1996) Ten myths of science: Reexamining what we think we knovv about the nature of science. School Sciences and Mathematics, 96, 10-16.
Perry, W.G. Jr. (1970) Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the collage years. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Sandoval, W.A. & Morrison, K. (2003). High school students' ideas about theories and theory change after a biological inquiry unit. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40 (4), 369-392.
Sandoval, W. A. (2005). Understanding students' practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89(4), 634-656.
Toth, E. E., Suthers, D. D., & Lesgold, A. (2002). "Mapping to know": The effects of representational guidance and reflective assessment on scientifıc inquiry. Science Education, 86, 264- 286.
White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to ali students. Cognition and instruction, 16(1), 3-118.
76

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com