KAVRAM YANILGILARI VE OLASI NEDENLERİ: KAYNAMA KAVRAMI

1. Ayas, A. ve Coştu, B. (2001). Lise I Öğrencilerinin “Buharlaşma, Yoğunlaşma ve
Kaynama” Kavramlarını Anlama Seviyeleri, Yeni Binyılın Başında Türkiye’de
Fen Bilimleri Eğitimi Sempozyumu, Maltepe Üniversitesi, İstanbul, Bildiriler
Kitabı, 273-280.
2. Coştu, B. (2002). Ortaöğretimin Farklı Seviyelerindeki Öğrencilerin Buharlaşma,
Yoğunlaşma ve Kaynama Kavramlarını Anlama Düzeylerine İlişkin Bir Çalışma,
Yüksek Lisans Tezi, K.T.Ü., Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Trabzon.
3. Case, M.J. & Fraser, D.M. (1999). An investigation into chemical engineering
students’ understanding of the mole and the use of concrete activities to promote
conceptual change, International Journal of Science Education, 21(12), 1237-1249.
4. Tsai, C-C. (1999). Overcoming junior high school students’ misconceptions about
microscopic views of phase change: A study of an anology activity, Journal of
Science Education and Technology, 8(1), 83-91.
5. Hwang, B.T. & Hwang, H.W.(1990). A Study of Cognitive Development of the
Concepts of Solution. Research Report Sponsored by the National Science
Council, ROC Taipei: NSC. In Chang, J.Y. (1999). Teacher college students’
conceptions about evaporation, condensation and boiling, Science Education, 83,
511-526.
6. Valanides, N. (2000). Primary students teachers’ understanding of the particulate
nature of matter and its transformations during dissolving, Chemistry Education:
Research and Practice in Europe, 1(2), 249-262.
7. Arizona State University (2001). Student Preconceptions and Misconceptions in
Chemistry, Integrated Physics and Chemistry Modeling Workshop.
8. Coştu, B., Karataş, F.Ö. ve Ayas, A. (2002). Kavram Yanılgılarının Giderilmesinde
Çalışma Yapraklarının Kullanılması, XVI. Ulusal Kimya Kongresi, Selçuk
Üniversitesi, Konya.
Kavram Yanılgıları ve Olası Nedenleri: Kaynama Kavramı 135
March 2007 Vol:15 No:1 Kastamonu Education Journal
9. Azizoğlu, N. ve Alkan, M., 2002. Kimya Öğretmenliği Lisans Öğrencilerinin Faz
Dengeleri Konusundaki Kavram Yanılgıları, V. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik
Eğitimi Kongresi, O.D.T.Ü Eğitim Fakültesi, Ankara.
10. Pınarbaşı, T & Canpolat, N. (2003). Students’ understanding of solutions
chemistry concepts, Journal of Chemical Education, 80,(11), 1328-1332.
11. Paik S-H., Kim H-N., Cho B-K & Park J-W. (2004). K-8th grade Korean students’
“conceptions of changes of state” and “conditions for changes of state”,
International Journal of Science Education, 26(2), 207-224.
12. Coştu, B (2006). Kavramsal Değişimin Gerçekleşme Düzeylerinin Belirlenmesi:
Buharlaşma, Yoğunlaşma ve Kaynama. Doktora Tezi, K.T.Ü., Fen Bilimleri
Enstitüsü, Trabzon.
13. Henriques, L. (2000). Children’s Misconceptions About Weather: A Review of
The Literature, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association
of Research in Science Teaching, New Orleands, L.A.
14. Osborne, R.J. & Cosgrove, M.M.(1983). Children’s conceptions of the changes of
state of water, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(9), 825-838.
15. Bar, V. & Travis, A.S. (1991). Children’s views concerning phase changes,
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 363-382.
16. Bodner, G. M. (1991). I have found you an argument, Journal of Chemical
Education, 68, 385-388.
17. Brody, M.J. (1993). Student Understanding of Water and Water Sources: A
Review of the Literature, Paper Presented at Annual Meeting of The American
Educational Research Associations, Atlanta, GA (Eric Document Reproduction
Service No. ED 361 230).
18. Hatzinikita, V. & Koulaidis, V. (1997). Pupils’ ideas on conservation during
changes in the state of water, Research in Science and Technological Education,
15(1), 53-71.
19. Chang, J.Y. (1999). Teacher college students’ conceptions about evaporation,
condensation, and boiling, Science Education, 83, 511-526.
20. Goodwin, A. (2000). The teaching of chemistry: Who is the learner? Chemistry
Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 1(19, 51-60.
21. Coştu, B. ve Ayas, A. (2002). Öğrencilerin Kaynama Olayı İle İlgili Düşüncelerinin ve
Anlamalarının Belirlenmesi, V. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi
Kongresi, O.D.T.Ü, Eğitim Fakültesi Ankara.
22. Ayas, A.. & Coştu, B. (2002). Levels of Understanding of the Evaporation Concept at
Secondary Stage, The First International Education Conference, Changing Times
Changing Needs, Eastern Mediterranean University, Gazimagusa-Northern Cyprus.
23. Ewings, M.S. & Mills, T.J. (1994). Water literacy in college freshman: Could a
cognitive imagery strategy improve understanding? Journal of Environmental
Education, 25, 4 36-40.
136 Bayram COŞTU, Alipaşa AYAS, Suat ÜNAL
Mart 2007 Cilt:15 No:1 Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi
24. Andersson, B. (1980). Some Aspects of Children’s Understanding of Boiling
Point, In Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., Wood-Robinson, V., Making
Sense of Secondary Science, Roultledge Press, London and Newyork.
25. Köseoğlu, F., Tümay, H. ve Kavak, N. (2002). Yapılandırıcı Öğrenme Teorisine
Dayanan Etkili Bir Öğretim Yöntemi-Tahmin Et-Gözle-Açıkla- “Buz ile su
kaynatılabilir mi?”, V. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi,
O.D.T.Ü Eğitim Fakültesi, Ankara.
26. Coştu, B., Karataş, F.Ö. ve Ayas, A. (2003). Kavram öğretiminde çalışma
yapraklarının kullanılması, Pamukkale Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(14), 33-48.
27. Johnson, P. (1998-a). Progression in children’s understanding of a ‘basic’ particle
theory: A longitudinal study, International Journal of Science Education, 20(4),
393-412.
28. Johnson, P. (1998-b). Children’s understanding of changes of state involving the
gas state, part 1: Boiling water and the particle theory, International Journal of
Science Education, 20(5), 567-583.
29. Johnson, P. (1998-c). Children’s understanding of changes of state involving the
gas state, part 2: Evaporation and condensation below boiling point, International
Journal of Science Education , 20(6), 695-709.
30. Azizoğlu, N., Alkan, M. & Geban, Ö. (2003). An Analysis of Undergraduate
Students’ Misconceptions related to Phase Equilibrium in Chemistry, Paper
presented at the Annual Meeting ESERA. .
http://www1.phys.uu.nl/esera2003/programme/authors.htm
31. Summers, M. (1992). Improving primary school teachers’ understanding of
science concepts theory into practice, International Journal of Science Education,
14, 25-40.
32. Summers M. & Kruger, C. (1994). A longitudinal study of a constructivist
approach to improving primary school teachers. Subject matter knowledge of
science, Teaching and Teacher Education, 10, 499-519.
33. Parker, J. & Heywood, D. (2000). Exploring the relationship between subject
knowledge and pedagogic content knowledge in primary teachers’ learning about
forces, International Journal of Science Education, 22, 89-111.
34. Kikas, E. (2004). Teachers’ conceptions and misconceptions concerning three
natural phenomena, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 432-448.
35. Barrass, R. (1984). Some misconceptions and misunderstandings perpetuated by
teachers and textbooks of biology, Journal of Biological Education, 18, 201-206.
36. Storey, D.R. (1989). Textbook errors & misconceptions in biology:
Photosynthesis, The American Biology Teacher, 51(5), 271-274.
37. Albanese, A. & Vicentini, M. (1997). Why do we believe that an atom is colourless?
Reflections about the teaching of the particle model, Science and Education, 6,
251-261.
38. Osborne R.J. & Wittrock, M. C. (1983). Learning science: A generative process,
Science Education, 67(4), 489-508.