Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Gelişmiş Ülkelerde İstihdam Politikaları, Esneklik Arayışı ve Etkileri

Journal Name:

  • Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2002

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Employment and unemployment are major parts of economic and social policies. In this sense, almost all of the societies at least have difficulties to solve economic and social problems since 1970's. The model, based on political stability, economic growth, full employment, welfare payments and national solidarity, has been changed radically in the last thirty years. Without forgetting this change, basic preferences of successful national employment policies of developed countries are evaluated and particularly flexibility approach and its impact on employment are discussed in this paper. In this context, flexibility approach and its impact on employ¬ment is discussed in four sub-titles which are flexible employment, wage flexibility, flexibility of employment protection and flexibility of social security.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
İstihdam ve işsizlik olguları ekonomik ve sosyal politikaların yapı taşlarıdır. Bu bağlamda son otuz yıl içerisinde toplumların ekonomik ve sosyal sorunlarını çözüme kavuşturmada başarılı olduklarını iddia etmek çok kolay değildir. Siyasi istikrar, ekonomik büyüme, tam istihdam, sosyal güvenceler ve ulusal dayanışma üzerine kurulu model değişim geçirmektedir. Makalede, bu değişimi unutmadan günümüzde istihdam politikalarında başarılı olan gelişmiş ülkelerin temel tercihleri değerlendi¬rilmiş ve bu tercihlerin biçimlenişinde esneklik arayışı ve etkileri irdelenmeye çalı¬şılmıştır. Bu amaçla istihdam politikalarına yansıyan esneklik arayışı; esnek istih¬dam, ücret esnekliği, istihdamın korunmasında esneklik ve sosyal güvencelerin es¬nekliği olmak üzere dört alt başlıkta değerlendirilmeye çalışılmıştır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-gelismis-ulkelerde-istihdam-politikalari-esneklik-arayisi-etkileri.pdf
  • 4
33
63
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Ashiagbor, D.
(2001)
, "EMU and the Shift in the European Labour Law Agenda: From 'Social Policy' to 'Employment Policy'", European Law Journal, Volume: 7; No: 3; September; pp.311-330.
Berthold, N.; Fehn, R. (2001), "Labour Market Policy in the New Economy", Conference on Economic Policy in the 'New Economy', Kiel Institute of World Economics, Paderborn, No: 48; May 15-16; pp.1-36.
Blien, U., Litzel, N., Möller, J. (2000), "The Development of European Labour Markets", Institute for Employment Research, Labour Market Research] Topics; No: 42; pp.1-52.
Boucher, G., Wickham, J. (2002), "Flex.Com-Flexibility and Competitiveness: Labour Mar¬ket Flexibility, Innovation and Organisational Performance", Irish National Report March/July; Employment Research Centre, Department of Sociology, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland; pp.1-67.
European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (2001), "Em¬ployment Through Flexibility: Squaring the Circle", Summary Report, Dublin, pp.1-6.
Fagan, C., Ward, K. (2000), "Regulatory Convergence? Nonstandard Work in the UK and The Netherlands", Conference on Nonstandard Work Arrangements in Japan, Europe and the United States, August 25-26, Michigan, USA; pp.1-72.
Ferrera, M., Hemerijck, A., Rhodes, M. (2001), "The Future of the European 'Social Model' in the Global Economy", Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research] and Practice, Volume: 3; pp.163-190.
Grunberg, I. (1999), "Jobs for All: What Have We Learnt Since the Social Summit?",
UNESCO, No: 162; pp.483-491.
Henning, A. N. (2001), "Flexible Qualification-A Key to Labour Law?", Thie International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations; Volume: 17; No: 1, Spring,
pp.101-115.
Hoffmann, E.; Walwei, U. (2000), "The Change in Work Arrangements in Denmark and Germany: Erosion or Renaissance of Standards?", First Draft; Conference on Non-standard Work Arrangements in Japan, Europe and the United States, August 25-26, Michigan, USA, pp.1-46.
Houseman, S., Osawa, M. (2000), "The Growth of Nonstandard Employment in Japan and the United States: A Comparison of Causes and Consequences", First Draft, Confer¬ence on Nonstandard Work Arrangements in Japan, Europe and the United States, August 25-26, Michigan, USA; pp.1-54.
http://www.newwork.com/Pages/Contributors/Sarfati/Socialdialogue.html (18.01.2003).
http://www.lex.unict.it/dml-online/archivio/numero1/online/zoppoli.html (18.01.2003).
Gelişmiş Ülkelerde İstihdam Politikaları, Esneklik Arayışı ve Etkileri 63 http://www.tisk.org.tr/yayinlar.asp?s=2 (18.01.2003).
Milner, S. (2001), "Globalisation and Employment in France: Between Flexibility and Pro¬tection?", Modern & Contemporary France; Volume: 9; No: 3; pp.327-337.
Modigliani, F., Fitoussi, J., Moro, B., Snower, D., Solow, R., Steinherr, A., Labini, P. (1999), "An Economists' Manifesto on Unemployment in the European Union"; Free University of Bozen; School of Economics, Bolzano, Italy, Working Paper; No: 1; pp.1-19.
Tella, R., MacCulloch, R. (2003), "The Consequences of Labour Market Flexibility: Panel Evidence Based on Survey Data"; Yayınlanmamış Makale.
Walwei, U. (1997), "Flexibility of Employment Relationships: Possibilities and Limits", In¬stitute for Employment Research; Labour Market Research Topics; No: 22; pp.1-13.
Walwei; U., Werner, H. (2000), "Back to Work: The Renaissance of the Dutch Labour Market", Michael Dauderstadt and Lothar Witte (edt.); Work and Welfare in the Enlarging Euroland; Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung; International Policy Analysis Unit; Bonn;
pp.31-49.
Werner, H. (1998), "Labour Market Trends in the United States-Lessons We Can Learn", Institute for Employment Research, Labour Market Research Topics; No: 25.
Werner, H. (1999), "Countries With Successful Employment Policy-What is Behind Their Success", Institute for Employment Research; Labour Market Research Topics; No:
33; pp.1-22.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com