Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

İLKÖĞRETİM ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN SİGARA İÇEN VE İÇMEYENLERİ ALGILAMA BİÇİMLERİ

Journal Name:

  • Marmara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2005

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
By doing this study, it was intended to determine how students in the first and second phases of primary education perceive some positive and negative peculiarities of smoking individuals. 201 (53,9%) students from first and 172 (44,1%) students from second phase, out of 373 participating students, constitute the sample of the study. In the study, a control list that includes 16 positive and 13 negative items, a total of 29 items, was used. %2-square technique was used to anlyse the data gathered. Findings from the study showed that the second phase students' perception level was higher in proportion to first phase students, in regarding smoking individuals as brave, free, clean, enthusiasm and successful. The second phase students also perceive nonsmokers as freer and more favorite person. Considering the negative peculiarities of smokers, the perception level of the second phase students was higher in proportion to the first phase students, in regarding smokers as tense, fool, individuals not thinking of themselves, individuals expecting admiration from others, individuals feeling admiration for others. In conjunction with this, the perception level of the first phase students was higher in proportion to the second phase students, in regarding smokers as ugly and individuals not thinking of themselves. There were significant differences between both groups, considering their perception levels of smokers and nonsmokers. The lowest difference, however, was found on the item related to health.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışma ile ilköğretim birinci ve ikinci kademe öğrencilerinin sigara içen ve içmeyen bireylerin bazı olumlu ve olumsuz özelliklerini nasıl algıladıkları belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Araştırmaya katılan 373 öğrencinin, 201'i (%53.9) birinci, 172'si (%44.1) ikinci kademe öğrencisidir. Araştırmada 16'sı olumlu 13'ü olumsuz olmak üzere 29 maddeden oluşan kontrol listesi kullanılmıştır. Veriler Ki Kare tekniği ile analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmadan elde edilen sonuçlara göre, ikinci kademe öğrencilerinin sigara içenleri cesaretli, özgür, temiz, heyecanlı ve başarılı olarak algılama düzeyleri birinci kademe öğrencilerine oranla yüksektir. İkinci kademe öğrencileri sigara içmeyenleri de daha yüksek oranda özgür ve gözde bireyler olarak algılamaktadırlar. Sigara içmeyle ilgili olumsuz özellikler dikkate alındığında, ikinci kademe öğrencilerinin birinci kademe öğrencilerine oranla sigara içenleri gergin, aptal, kendini düşünmeyen, daha çok beğenilmek isteyen, başkasına hayranlık duyan kişiler olarak algılama düzeyleri daha yüksektir. Buna karşılık birinci kademe öğrencilerin de ikinci kademe öğrencilerine oranla sigara içenleri çirkin ve kendini düşünmeyenler şeklindeki algılama düzeyi daha yüksektir. Birinci ve ikinci kademe öğrencilerinin sigara içen ve içmeyen bireyleri algılama düzeylerinde anlamlı olmayan bazı farklılıklar da vardır. Ancak algılama düzeyleri arasındaki en düşük farklılık sağlıkla ilgili maddedir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-ilkogretim-ogrencilerinin-sigara-icen-icmeyenleri-algilama-bicimleri.pdf
  • 21
213
224
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Bandura,
A
. (1977).Social Learning Theory. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Inc., pp.22-27.
Beck, A.T., Wright, F.D, Newman, C.F, & Liese, BS. 1993. Cognitive Therapy of Substance Abuse. New York: Guilford,
Byrne, D.G., Byrne, A.E., Reinhart, M.I. (1995). Personality, stress and the decision to commence cigarette smoking in adolescence. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 39,53¬62.
Canlan, M. (1989). Control over health and patterns of health related behaviour. Social Science andMedicin,29,131-136.
Carvajal, S.C., Wiatrek, D.E., Evans, R.I., Knee, C.R., Nash, S.G. (2000). Psychosocial determinants of the onset and escalation of smoking: cross-sectional and prospective findings in multiethnic middle school samples. Journal of Adolescent Health, 27, 255¬265.
Chassin, L., Presson, C.C, Sherman, S.J., Mulvenon, S.(1994) Family history of smoking
and young adult smoking behavior. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors,8, 102-110. Copeland, L.A., Shope, J.T., Waller, P.F. (1996). Factors in adolescent drinking/driving:
binge drinking, cigarette smoking and gender, Journal of School Health, 66, 574-578. Dinh, K.T., Sarason, I.G., Onstad, L.E., Peterson, A.V. (1995). Children's perceptions of
smokers and nonsmokers a longitudial study. Health Psychology,1,32-34.
Doğan, O. (2001). Sivas ilinde lise öğrencilerinde madde kullanımı yaygınlığı, Bağımlılık
Dergisi,
2, 53-56.
Doherty, W.J., Allen, W., (1994). Family functioning and parental smoking as predictors of adolescent cigarette use: a six-year prospective study. Journal of Family Psychology 8,47-353 .
Ennett, S.T., Bauman, K.E., (1994). The contribution of influence and selection to
adolescent peer group homogenity: the case of adolescent cigarette smoking. Journal of
Personality & Social Psychology, 67,653-663. Freeman, M.A., Hannessy, E.V., Marzullo, D.M. (2001). Defensive evaluation of smoking
messages among college-age smokers: the role of possible selves. Health Psychology, 20,
424-433.
223
M.Ü. Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi Yıl: 2005, Sayı 21, Sayfa : 213-224
Gibbons, F.X., Gerrard, M. (1995).Predicting young adults' health risk bahavior. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 505-517. Gillmore, M.R., Wells, E.A, Simpson, E.E., Morrison, D.M., Hoppe, M.J., Wilsdon, A.A.,
Murowchick, E. (2002). Children's beliefs about smoking. Nicotine & Tobacco Research,'
4,177-183.
Goldman, M.S., Rather, B.C. (1993). Substance use disorders:cognitive models and
architecture. K. Dobson PC. Kendall (editors). Psychoplatology and Cognition.San
Diego: Academic Press,pp. 245-292.
Göksel
, T., Cirit, M., Bayındır, Ü. (2001) İzmir ili lise öğrencilerinin sigara alışkanlığını
etkileyen faktörler. Toraks Dergisi,3,49-53. Hine, D.W., Summers, C., Tilleczek, K., Lewko, J. (1997). Expectancies and mental models
as determinants of adolescents' smoking decisions. Journal of Social Issues, 53, 35-52. Jackson, C. (2002). Legitimacy of parental authority and tabacco and alcohol use during
early adolescence. Journal of Adolescent Health, 31,425-432.
Karlıkaya
, C. (2002) Edirne'de lise öğrencilerinde sigara içme prevalansı kaçakçılık,
reklamlar ve ergenlerin sigaraya ulaşması. Toraks Dergisi,1,007-012. Killen, J.D., Robinson, T.N., Haydel, K.F., Hayward, C., Wilson, D.M., .Hammer, L.D., Litt,
I.F., Taylor, C.B.
(1997)
. Prospective study of risk factors for the initiation of cigarette
smoking. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 65,1011-1016.
Maisto, S.A., Carey, K.B., Bradizza, C.M. (1999) Social learning theory KE. Leonard, HT
Blane (editors) Psychological Theories of Drinking and Alcoholism, New York:Guilford, 106-163.
Mathews, A. (1997). Information -processing biases in emotional disorders. DM. Clark, CG.
Fairbun (editors). Science and Practice of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy. New York:
Oxford University Press, 47-67. Rose, J.S., Chassin, L., Presson, C.C., Sherman, S.J. (1996). Demographic factors in adult
smoking status: mediating and moderating influences. Psychology of Addictive
Behaviors, 10, 28-37.
Rugkasa, J., Kennedy, O., Barton, M., Abaunza, P.S., Treacy, M.P., Knox, B. (2001) Smoking and symbolism: children, communication and cigarettes. Health Education Research, 16, 131-142.
Serrano, V.A., Woodruff, S.I. (2003). Smoking-related attitudes and their sociodemographic correlates among mexican-origin adult smokers. Journal of Community Health: The Publication for Health Promotion & Disease Prevention', 28, 209-220.
Shadel, W.G., Niaura, R, Abrams, D.B., (2001). How do adolescents process smoking and
antismoking advertisements? a social cognitive analysis with ımplications for understanding smoking ınitiation. Review of General Psychology, 4, 429-444.
Tekinsoysal, S. (2003) Sigara İçen ve İçmeyen Bireylerin Sigara İçmeye İlişkin Tutumları. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Trabzon: KTÜ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
Yılmaz, B. (2000). Şema odaklı bilişsel terapiler. Türk Psikoloji Bülteni, 19, 53-58.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com