Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Teachers’ Preferences for Selecting New Media Tools for Education

Journal Name:

  • Middle Eastern & African Journal of Educational Research

Publication Year:

  • 2014

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The purpose of this paper is to present teachers’ views on their choices of different media types for an effective learning environment. To achieve this goal, quantitative research method was implemented. The participants of the study were teachers at different age group and majors. The data source of this study was teachers’ responses to the given questionnaire. Teachers’ comments for an open-ended question were also analyzed to support the findings. The results show that the participants’ ages, gender, usage of social media sites and computer skill levels have affected their media selection preferences for learning environments.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-teachers-preferences-selecting-new-media-tools-education.pdf
  • 1
27
39
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Bai, H. & Ertmer, P. (2008) Teacher educators’ beliefs and technology uses as predictors of preservice teachers’ beliefs and technology attitudes. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(1), 93-112.
Barnes, J., Mosgrove B., Rassouli, J., (1982), An objective and task media selection decision model and advertising cost, Journa of Advertising, 11 (4).
Bates A W., (1995) Technology, Open Learning and Distance Education, Routledge: London
Baytak, A. (2010). Media selection for learning.VDM Verlag: Berlin
Baytak, (2012). Factors appeared in student-teachers’ views about computer-based instructional material development. EEST-Part B 4(2). 831-842
Ching, Y., Ke, F., Lin, H. & Dwyer, F. (2005). Effects of Animation in Facilitating Student Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Assessment. In P. Kommers & G. Richards (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, 4459-4461.
Clark, R. E., (2001). Educational Media, International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Pergamon, Oxford. 4279-4283.
Clements, D. H. (1999). ‘concrete’ manipulatives, concrete ideas. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 1(1), 45-60.
Davidson, LJ., Richardson, M., Jones, D. (2014). Teachers’ perspective on using technology as an instructional tool, Research in Higher Education Journal 24-August
Dorr, G., Seel, N., (1997). Instructional delivery systems and multimedia environments.From R.Tennyson, N. Schott, N. Seel, & S. Dijkstra. (Eds.) Instructional design: International perspectives. Vol. 2: Solving Instructional Design Problems. (pp.145-176) 1997. Mahwah, NJ. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Drent, M., Meelissen M., (2008). Which factors obstruct or stimulate teacher educators to use ICT innovatively? Computers & Education, 51, 187–199.
Middle Eastern & African Journal of Educational Research, Issue 13
Year 2014
39
Gagné, R. M., Briggs, L. J., Wager, W. W., (1992). Principles of Instructional Design (4th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
Hammond, M., Reynolds, L.J. and Ingram, J. (2011). How and why do student teachers use ICT? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27 (3). 191-203.
Morris, G.M, & Venkatesh. V. (2000). Age differences in technology adoption decisions: implications for a changing work force. Personnel Psychology. 53. 375-379.
Orhan, F., Akkoyunlu, B. (2003). Profiles and Opinions of the Computer Formative Teachers’ on The DifficultüesThey Have Faced During The Applications. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 24: 90-100
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon 9(5). 1-6.
Romiszowski, A. J. (1998). The selection and use of instructional media: for improved classroom teaching and for interactive, individualized instruction (2nd ed.). London : K. Page ; New York : Nichols Pub.
Smith, P. L., Ragan, T. J. (1999). Instructional design (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Sugar, W., Crawley, F., & Fine, B. (2004). Examining teachers’ decisions to adopt new technology. Educational Technology and Society, 7 (4), 201-213.
The Guardian, (2014). Facebook: 10 years of social networking, in numbers. Retrived from http://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2014/feb/04/facebook-in-numbers...
Timmerman, C. E.,(2003). Media selection during the implementation of planned organizational change, Management Communication Quarterly, 16(3).
Toth, T., (2003). Animation: just enough never too much, American Society for Training and Development. Retrieved, October 14 2005 from http://www.learningcircuits.org/2003/aug2003/toth.htm
Turel. Y.K. & Varol, F. (2012). Pre-service teachers’ choice of physical versus electronic instructional materials. Contemporary Educational Technology, 3(1), 17-35.
TUIK (2013). Bilgi Toplumu İstatistikleri. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu www.tuik.gov.tr
Yau H.K. & Cheng, A.L. (2012). Gender Difference of Confidence in Using Technology for Learning. Journal of Technology Studies, 28(2).
Yau H.K. & Cheng, A.L. (2012). Students’ age difference of confidence in using technology for learning in higher education. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology. 11(3). 308-311.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com