Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Impact of Instructional Object Based Card Game on Learning Mathematics: Instructional Design Nettle

Journal Name:

  • Middle Eastern & African Journal of Educational Research

Publication Year:

  • 2014

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This paper describes the design process of an Instructional Object Based Game (IOBG) which was designed using Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) principles and assesses its impact on the performance of students learning in mathematics as investigated from two sets of subjects. The unit of analysis consists of two hundred (200) Junior Secondary School 2 (JSS 2) students selected from 20 co- educational schools within Lagos Island and Eti-Osa educational Zones of Lagos State, Nigeria. Multi stage stratified random sampling was used to avoid interclass mixed situation. A fifty percent (50%) proportionate on each zone and stratified simple random sampling technique was adopted to give non mixed schools within the zones equal chance of being taken. A quasi-experimental control group design with repeated measures analysis of covariance was adopted. Two separate summary results of ANCOVA showed that F (1,199) = 12.88 @ p = 0.013 and F (1,193) = 13.00 at p = 0.00 implied that the use of OBG (game) in teaching and learning had significant effect on the performance of learners in Mathematics. The calculated mean scores and 2-way ANCOVA results also showed that gender has no significant influence on the performance of learners in either the used of IOBG or MAT.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-impact-instructional-object-based-card-game-learning-mathematics-instructional-design-nettle.pdf
  • 1
4
18
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Agosto, D.E. (2009). Girls and Gaming: a summary of the research with implications for practice. Teacher Librarian, 31(3), 8- 14.
Amory, A. (2007). Game object model version II: A theoretical framework for educational game development. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 55(1), 51-77.
Amory, A., Naicker, K., Vincent, J. & Adams, C. (1999).The use of computer games as an educational tool: 1, identification of appropriate game type and game element. British Journal of educational Technology systems, 24, 195-205.
Annetta, L., Mangrum, J., Holmes, S., Collazo, K., & Cheng, M.T. (2009). Bridging reality to virtual reality: Investigating gender effect and student engagement on learning through video game play in an elementary school classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 31(8), 1091- 1113.
Asim, A.E. (2007). Examination ethics and school based assessments in science, technology and mathematics: A critical concern for universal basic education. Proceedings of the 9th National Conference of National Association of Evaluators and Researchers. Nigeria, Ago-Iwoye.
Asim, A.E., Kalu, I. M., Idaka, I.E., & Bassey, S.W. (2009). Competency in STM assessment: The case of primary school teachers in cross River state, Nigeria. Proceedings of international Conference to Review Research in science, Technology and Mathematics Education (episteme-2), Feb. 12- 15, Mumbai, India.
Asimeng- Boahene, L. (2010). Gender inequality in Science Mathematics education in Africa: The causes, consequences and solution. Unpublished seminal paper.
Berson, M. I., & Bayata, P.(2010). Technological thinking and practice in the social studies: Transcending the tumultuous adolescence of reform. Journal of computing in teacher education 20(4), 141-150.
Bloom, B. S. (1959): Taxonomy of Educational objectives, Handbook cognitive New York David. Domain, Mckay Group Inc.
Middle Eastern & African Journal of Educational Research, Issue 8
Year 2014
17
Chandra, V. & Lioyd, M. (2008). The methodological nettle: ICT and Student Achievement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, (6) 1089-98.
Corbeil, P. (1999). Learning from the children; practical and Theoretical Reflections on playing and learning simulation and Gaming, 30(2), 163-180.
Cox, S. (2008). A conceptual analysis of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Brigham Young University.
Cuban, L. (2008). Hugging the middle: How teachers teach in an era of testing and accountability. New York: Teachers college press. Design-Based Research collective. An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher. 32(1), 5-8.
Doering, A., Veletsianos, G., & Scharber, C. (2007b). Coming of age: Research and Pedagogy on geospatial technologies within K-12 social studies education. In A. J. Milson & Alibrandi, M. (Eds.), Digital geography: Geo-spatial technologies in the social studies classroom (pp. 213-226). Chariotte, NC: Information Age publishing.
Doyle, K.(2010).Academic work. Review of Educational Research 53,159-199.
Eke, E. (1986). Causes of students’ underachievement in science, proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Science Teachers' Association of Nigeria, pp47-56.
Fillier, K. (2009). Math Anxiety: Strategies for Preventing, Reducing, and Overcoming the Problem. Faculty of Ed. Submitted to Professor Robert Kelly of Memorial University of Newfoundland.
Friendman, A. M., & Hicks, D. (2010). The state of the field: Technology, Social Studies and Teacher Education. Contemporary issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 6(2). From http:// www.citejournal.org/vol4/iss3/general/article.2.cfm . Retrieved February 13th, 2012.
Gee, J.P. (2009). Why are video games good for learning ? from http:// www.academiccolab.org/resources/documents/MacArthur.pdf. Retrieved January 16th, 2012.
Grifth, S.A. (2005). Assuring fairness in school-based assessment: mapping the boundaries of teachers’ involvement. Paper presented at the 31st Annual conference of International Association.
Haertel, C. D. et al. (1991). Early Adolescent Sex Differences in science learning: Evidence from National Assessment of Education Progress. American Educational Research Journal. 18(3), 329-340.
Hartmann,T., & Klimmt, C.(2010). Gender and Computer Games: Exploring females’ dislikes. Journal of computer- mediated communication, 11(4), 910- 931.
Hoon, T. S., Chong, T. S. & Bintin Ngah, N. A. (2010). Effect of an interactive social game environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 3, 455 – 464.
Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, R.T. (2011).Learning Mathematics and cooperative Learning, Lesson plans for Teachers, Minnesota: Interactive Book Company.
Kinzie, M. & Joseph, D. (2008).Gender differences in game activity preferences of middle school children: implications for educational game design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56 (5), 643-663.
Ke, F.(2008).A case study of computer gaming for math: Engaged Learning from game play? Computer and Education, 51(4), 1609-1620.
Middle Eastern & African Journal of Educational Research, Issue 8
Year 2014
18
Ke, F., & Grabowski, B. (2007). Game playing for math’s learning: Cooperative or not? British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2), 249-259.
Kinzie, M. & Joseph, D. (2008).Gender differences in game activity preferences of middle school children: implications for educational game design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56 (5), 643-663.
Martorella, P. (2005). Technology and Social Studies: Which way to the sleeping giant? Theory and Research in social Education, 25 (4), 511-514.
Miller, D. J. & Robertson, D.P. (2010). Using a games console in the primary classroom: Effects of “Brain Training” Programme on computation and self-esteem. British Journal of Education Technology, 41,(2) 242 – 255.
Oblinger, D.G. (2010).Games and Learning. EDUCASE Quarterly, 29(3), 5-7.
Olatoye, M. A. (2002). Computer - Based Instruction in Primary Schools: A case for Mathematics and English. Educational Perspective: A Journal of the Faculty of Education, Lagos State Uni-versity. Lagos, Nigeria. 5 (2), pp28-32.
Onwioduokit, F. A & Akinbobola, A. O. (2005). Effects of pictorial and written advance organizers on students’ achievement in senior secondary school physics. JSTAN 40 (1 & 2) 109 – 116.
Rieber, L. P. (1996). Seriously considering play; Design interaction learning environments based on the blending of microworlds, simulations and games. Educational Technology Research and development, 44(1), 43-58.
Ross, E. (2010). The Promise and Perils of e-Learning. Theory and Research in social Education, 28 (4), 482-492. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundation of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1- 22.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational
Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
Singh, K. Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. Journal of Educational Research, 95(6), 323-332.
Swan, K. O., & Hofer, M. (2008). Technology and social studies. In L. S. Levstik & C. A. Tyson (Eds.), Handbook of research in social studies education (pp. 307-326). New York: Routledge
Vogel, J.J., Vogel, D. S., Cannon-Bowers, J., Bowers, C. A., Muse, K., & Wright, M. (2006). Computer gaming and interactive simulations for learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational computing Research, 34(3), 229 – 243.
Watson, A. & Sullivan, P. (2008). Teachers Learning About Tasks and Lesson. In D. Tirosha & Woods (Eds.). International hand book of mathematics teachers’ education: Tools processes in mathematics Teacher Education. 2, 109-134 Rotterdam, the Netherlands: sense publication.
Yoloye, E.A. (2008). Students’ gender and science achievement: Historical Perspectives and their present and future practice. In Naido, P., & Savage, M. (Eds.), African Science and Technology in the millennium, Cape Town: Junta & co.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com