Apedoe, X. S., Reynolds, B., Ellefson, M. R., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Bringing engineering design into high school science classrooms: the heating/cooling unit. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(5), 454–465.
Aydede, M. N. (2006). İlköğretim altıncı sınıf fen bilgisi dersinde aktif öğrenme yaklaşımını kullanmanın akademik başarı, tutum ve kalıcılık üzerine etkisi.Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
Bers, M. U., & Portsmore, M. (2005). Teaching partnerships: Early childhood and engineering students teaching math and science through robotics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(1), 59-73.
Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing engineering education in P‐12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education,97(3), 369-387.
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. (11. Baskı), Ankara: Pegem Akademi yayınları.
Cajas, F. (2001). The science/technology interaction: Implications for science literacy. Journal of research in science teaching, 38(7), 715-729.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. (2nd edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Cunningham, C., & Hester, K. (2007). Engineering is elementary: An engineering and technology curriculum for children. In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, HI.
Fortus, D., Dershimer, R. C., Krajcik, J., Marx, R. W., & Mamlok‐Naaman, R. (2004). Design‐based science and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 1081-1110.
Fortus, D., Dershimer, R. C., Krajcik, J., Marx, R. W., & Mamlok‐Naaman, R. (2005). Designbased science and real-world problem-solving. International Journal of Science Education, 27(7): 855–879
Johnson, B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. (2004). Mixed Methods Resarch: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come. Educational Researcher, 33 (7), 14-26
Katehi, L., Pearson, G., & Feder, M. (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. Washington, DC: National Academies Press
Kolodner, J. L. (2002). Facilitating the learning of design practices: Lessons learned from an inquiry into science education. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 39(3).
Kolodner, J.L., P.J. Camp, D. Crismond, B. Fasse, J. Gray, & J. Holbrook (2003). Problem based learning meets case-based reasoning in the science classroom: putting learning by- design into practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 12(4): 495–547.
Marulcu, I., & Barnett, M. (2010). Teaching simple machines to college students through LEGO™ engineering design challenges. In M.F. Taşar & G. Çakmakcı (Eds.), Contemporary science education research: learning and assessment (pp. 173-182). Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi
Marulcu, I., & Barnett, M. (2013). Fifth Graders’ Learning About Simple Machines Through Engineering Design-Based Instruction Using LEGO™ Materials. Research in Science Education, 1-26.
Middle Eastern & African Journal of Educational Research, Issue 9
Year 2014
58
MEB (2006), İlköğretim fen ve teknoloji dersi (6, 7 ve 8. Sınıflar) öğretim programı, Ankara: Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı.
Mehalik, M. M., Doppelt, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Middle-school science through design-based learning versus scripted inquiry: Better overall science concept learning and equity gap reduction. Journal of Engineering Education. 97(1), 71–85.
Nagy, S. and Biber, H. (2010). Mixed methods research: merging theory with practice. New York: The Guilford Press.
Noble, M. (2001). The educational impact of LEGO Dacta materials. Sheffield Hallam University. Retrieved November, 2, 2004.
Penner, D. E., Giles, N. D., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (1997). Building functional models: Designing an elbow. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(2), 125-143.
Ringwood, J. V., Monaghan, K., & Maloco, J. (2005). Teaching engineering design through Lego® Mindstorms™. European Journal of Engineering Education, 30(1), 91-104.
Rivet, A. E., & Krajcik, J. S. (2004). Achieving standards in urban systemic reform: An example of a sixth grade project‐based science curriculum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(7), 669-692.
Roth, W.M. (2001). Learning science through technological design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 38(7): 768–790.
Silk, E. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Using robotics to teach mathematics: Analysis of a curriculum designed and implemented. In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Pittsburgh, PA.
Wang, H. H., Moore, T. J., Roehrig, G. H., & Park, M. S. (2011). STEM Integration: Teacher Perceptions and Practice. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education, 1(2).
Wendell, K. B., & Lee, H. S. (2010). Elementary students’ Learning of materials science practices through instruction based on engineering design tasks.Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(6), 580-601.
Wendell, K. B., Connolly, K. G., Wright, C. G., Jarvin, L., Rogers, C., & Barnett, M. (2008). Design a musical instrument: The science of sound. Unpublished science curriculum unit. URL: http://legoengineering.com/curriculumsubmenuteachingresources-142.html
İnternet Kaynakları
1. http://www.limitsizenerji.com/temel-bilgiler/yenilenebilir-enerji-kaynak..., (14. 11. 2013).
2. www.usfirst.org, (14. 11. 2013)
Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com
