Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

İlköğretim İkinci Kademe Öğrencilerinin Fen ve Teknoloji Dersi Öz-Düzenlemeli Öğrenme Stratejilerinin İncelenmesi

Investigation of Middle School Learners Self-Regulated Learning Strategies in Science and Technology Course

Journal Name:

  • Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2014

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Learning involves using self-regulation processes (Azevedo, 2009). ―Selfregulation is individual‘s affecting, guiding and controlling his behavior‖ (Senemoğlu, 2004: 231). Although there are studies indicating the effects of self-regulation on achievement, there is a complexity between the relation of the quality, basic components, and some other fields with other structures (Zeidner, Boekaerts, Pintrich, 2005). This study assumes that self-regulatory learning strategies have three dimensions which are cognitive strategies, metacognitive strategies, and resource management strategies. Cognitive strategies are rehearsal, elaboration, and organizational strategies. Metacognitive strategies are divided into two categories. One of them is knowledge of the cognition and the other is regulation of cognition. Resource management strategies are time management strategies, environmental structuring strategies and help seeking strategies. According to Pintrich (2005) in self-regulation studies individual characteristics should also be considered. One of the individual characteristics in educational research is the gender. Another individual variable is age. According to Zeidner, Boekaerts and Pintrich (2005) the variation of self-regulation by age should be studied. In this study the variable of grade level was used to cover the variables of gender and age. The aim of the study is to ―investigate self-regulating learning strategies employed by middle school learners in science and technology course‖. Research questions are aimed to examine strategy use in item and dimension level with regard to gender and grade level. In this study, the survey method was used. The data were gathered from 1286 volunteered students. 404 of them were 6th grade (191 female, 213 male), 426 of them were 7th grade (200 female, 226 male), and 456 of them were 8th grade students (216 female, 240 male). The data collecting tool was ―Scale of self-regulatory learning strategies in Science and Technology Classes‖ which was developed by the researchers. As the result of exploratory factor analysis, it was found that two items written for assessing graphic organizers formed a dimension explaining 3.66 % of total variance and this dimension was named Graphic Organizing Strategies. The confirmatory factor analysis of Knowledge and Cognition and Regulating Knowledge did not provide two different sub-dimensions. The two groups were grouped under one single dimension. SPSS 17.0 was used for exploratory factor analysis and reliability analysis. AMOS 16.0 was used for confirmatory factor analysis. The construct validity and reliability of scales and sub-dimensions were analysed in both scale development sample and research samples. In scale-development sample reliability coefficients varied between .63 and .93, where the coefficients varied between .62 and .93 in research sample. The coefficients values greater than .60 are viewed as acceptable (Özdamar, 2004). To answer research questions arithmetical mean, and standard deviation were calculated and independent samples t test, one way analysis of variance, Scheffé tests were used. To determine the effect size eta-squared was calculated. Pallant (2003) states that if η2 is between .01 and .05 the effect size is low, .06 and .13 indicates moderate and the value which is greater than .14 indicates a high effect. All factors in the scale do not have equal number of items. Hence, the total means of dimensions were divided by the item numbers. The dimensions with the highest means are Knowledge of Cognition ( X =2.63) and Regulating of Cognition (X=2.63). Açıkgöz (2007a: 109) states that ―having knowledge on learning and thinking processes facilitates controlling the process‖. The findings of the study are parallel with this conclusion. The least frequently used strategies are Cognitive Learning Strategies ( X =2.42). When the dimensions of sub-scales are analysed, it was observed that the least frequently used strategies in Cognitive Learning Strategies are Graphic Organizing Strategies ( X =1.78). The least frequently used strategy in this dimension is Concept Mapping. Concept maps are graphic organizing tools indicating relations between concepts and the links between concepts at the same level (Cunningham and Turgut, 1996). Employing these strategies less frequently may hinder the effectiveness of concept learning (Altınok, 2004). The findings of the study are negative in this sense. The effect of gender on strategy use was generally statistically significant. Means of female subjects were higher than male subjects in Organizing strategies, rehearsal strategies, elaboration strategies, and overall Cognitive Learning Strategies Inventory. Furthermore the findings were the same in Knowledge of Cognition, Regulating Cognition, help seeking strategies, environmental structuring strategies, overall Resource Management Strategies and in general. However, the effect size of the difference was low. There was no statistically significant difference in Graphic Organizing Strategies and Time Management Strategies. These dimensions also indicated a low strategy employment. When the relationship between grade level and strategy employment is investigated, the findings indicated that there were significant differences in all dimensions and in general. Scheffé test indicates that 6th grade students employ strategies more frequently 7th and 8th grades. Furthermore 7th grade students employ strategies more frequently than 8th grade students. The effect size is low in Organizing, Graphic Organizing, Knowledge of Cognition, Time Management, help seeking strategies and environmental structuring strategies. The effect size is moderate in other dimensions. To summarize, strategy employment decrease as the grade level increases. Kılıç Çakmak et. al. (2008) state that strategy employment frequency decreases as the grade level increases. The students are required to take placement tests more often as the grade level increases. The students get more tests oriented than being learning oriented. Hence, learners employ test taking strategies more than they do learning strategies. Kılıç Çakmak et. al (2008) comment that learning–teaching environment does not foster learning to learn. On the contrary the learners are guided to a memorizing approach.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu araştırmanın amacı, ilköğretim ikinci kademe öğrencilerinin Fen ve Teknoloji Dersinde kullandıkları öz-düzenlemeli öğrenme stratejilerinin kullanım düzeylerini belirlemek ve bunların cinsiyet ve sınıf seviyesine göre dağılımını incelemektir. Tarama modelindeki bu araştırma 2010-2011 öğretim yılı birinci döneminde Edirne İli Merkez İlçedeki İlköğretim okullarında, ikinci kademede öğrenim görmekte olan 1286 öğrencinin katılımı ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırma verileri, varsayılan model çerçevesinde araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilen “Fen ve Teknoloji Dersi Öz-Düzenlemeli Öğrenme Stratejileri Ölçeği” ile toplanmıştır. Araştırmanın sonuçlarına göre öğrenciler, Bilişsel Öğrenme Stratejilerinden en çok Örgütleme Stratejilerini, en az Grafik Örgütleyici Stratejileri; Kaynak Yönetim Stratejilerinde en çok Yardım Arama Stratejilerini, en az Zaman Yönetim Stratejilerini kullanmaktadırlar. Bununla birlikte Biliş Bilgisi ve Bilişin Düzenlemesi Stratejilerinin kullanımları “çok sık” düzeyindedir. Cinsiyete göre strateji kullanımları incelendiğinde Grafik Örgütleyici Stratejiler ve Zaman Yönetim Stratejileri hariç tüm ölçeklerin genelinde ve alt boyutlarında kızlar lehine anlamlı farklar bulunmuştur. Sınıf düzeyine göre durumlar incelendiğinde ise, sınıf seviyesi arttıkça strateji kullanımında anlamlı bir azalma olduğu belirlenmiştir. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre öğrencilerin öz-düzenlemeli öğrenme stratejilerini kullanımını artırmaya yönelik önerilerde bulunulmuştur.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-ilkogretim-ikinci-kademe-ogrencilerinin-fen-teknoloji-dersi-oz-duzenlemeli-ogrenme-stratejilerinin-incelenmesi.pdf
  • 1
261
287
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

ABDULLAH Melissa Ng Lee (2007). ―Exploring Children‘s Self-Regulated Learning Skills‖, The
1st International Conference on Educational Reform, 9-11 November 2007, Mahasarakham
University, Thailand
ABLARD Karen E. ve LIPSCHULTZ Rachelle E. (1998). „Self-Regulated Learning in High-
Achieving Students: Relations to Advanced Reasoning, Achievement Goals, and Gender‖,
Journal of Educational Psychology, C.90, S.1, s. 94–101.
AÇIKGÖZ Kamile Ün (2004). Aktif Öğrenme, Ġzmir: Eğitim Dünyası Yayınları.
AÇIKGÖZ Kamile Ün (2007a). Aktif Öğrenme Yazıları, Ġzmir: BiliĢ Yayınları.
AÇIKGÖZ Kamile Ün (2007b). BaĢarmak Elimizde, Ġzmir: BiliĢ Yayınları.
AKIN Ahmet, ABACI Ramazan ve ÇETĠN Bayram (2007). ―BiliĢötesi Farkındalık Envanteri‘nin
Türkçe Formunun Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik ÇalıĢması‖, Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim
Bilimleri, C.7, S.2, s. 655-680.
AKYOL Gülsüm, SUNGUR Sungur, ve TEKKAYA Ceren. (2010). ―The Contribution Of
Cognitive And Metacognitive Strategy Use To Students‘ Science Achievement‖,
Educational Research and Evaluation, C. 16, S.1, s.1-21.
ALCI Bülent ve ALTUN Sertel (2007). ―Lise Öğrencilerinin Matematik Dersine Yönelik
Özdüzenleme ve BiliĢüstü Becerileri, Cinsiyete, Sınıfa ve Alanlara Göre FarklılaĢmakta
mıdır?‖, Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, C.16, S.1, 33–44.
ALTINOK Hülya (2004). ĠĢbirlikli Öğrenme, Kavram Haritalama, Fen BaĢarısı, Strateji
Kullanımı ve Tutum, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, y.d.t., Ġzmir.
ALTUN Sertel. (2005). Öğrencilerin Öz Düzenlemeye Dayalı Öğrenme Stratejilerinin ve Öz
Yeterlik Algılarının Öğrenme Stilleri ve Cinsiyete Göre Matematik BaĢarısını Yordama
Gücü, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, y.d.t., Ġstanbul.
ARSAL Zeki (2005). ―Öğretmen Adaylarının Öğrenme Ve Motivasyon Stratejileri‖, XIV. Ulusal
Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi Bildirileri, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi, 28–30 Eylül
2005, Denizli.
AZEVEDO Roger (2009). ―Theoretical, Conceptual, Methodological, and Instructional Issues in
Research on Metacognition and Self-Regulated Learning: A Discussion‖, Metacognition
and Learning, C.4, S.1, s.87–95.
BIDJERANO Temi (2005). ―Gender Differences in Self-Regulated Learning‖, The 36th /2005
Annual Meeting of the Northeastern Educational Research Association, 19-21 October
2005, Kerhonkson, NY, USA.
BOEKAERTS Monique ve NIEMIVIRTA Markku. (2005). ―Self-Regulated Learning: Finding a
Balance between Learning Goals and Ego-Protective Goals‖, Handbook of Self-
Regulation, Ed.: Monque Boekaerts, Paul R. Pintrich, Moshe Zeidner, San Diego, CA:
Academic Press, pp. 417–450
BROWN Timothy A (2006). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. NY: Guilford
Press.
Öz-Düzenlemeli Öğrenme Stratejileri | 277
ISSN: 1300-302X © 2014 OMÜ EĞĠTĠM FAKÜLTESĠ
BROWNE Michael W. ve CUDECK Robert (1993). ―Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit‖,
Testing Structural Equation Models, Ed.: Kenneth A. Bollen ve J. Scott Long, Newbury
Park, CA: Sage, s. 136–162.
BULUT Serpil (2006). Ġlköğretim II. Kademe Öğrencilerinin Matematik Dersinde
Kullandıkları Öğrenme Stratejileri ve BaĢarı Güdüleri, Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal
Bilimler Enstitüsü, y.y.t., Edirne.
BURSAL Murat (2013). ―Longitudinal Investigation of Elementary Students‘ Science Academic
Achievement in 4-8th Grades: Grade Level and Gender Differences‖, Educational Sciences: Theory &
Practice, C.13, S.2, s. 1151-1156.
BÜYÜKÖZTÜRK ġener, AKGÜN Özcan Erkan, ÖZKAHVECI Özden ve DEMIREL Funda
(2004). ―Güdülenme ve Öğrenme Stratejileri Ölçeğinin Türkçe Formunun Geçerlik ve
Güvenirlik ÇalıĢması‖, Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri / Educational Sciences:
Theory & Practice, C.4, S.2, s. 207-239.
BYRNE Barbara M. (2001). Structural Equation Modeling With AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications,
and Programming, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
CANCA Deniz (2005). Cinsiyete Göre Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Kullandıkları BiliĢsel ve
BiliĢ Üstü Öz Düzenleme Stratejileri ile Akademik BaĢarıları Arasındaki ĠliĢkinin
Ġncelenmesi, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, y.y.t., Ġstanbul.
CEKOLIN Catherine Helen (2001). The Effects of Self-Regulated Learning Strategy
Instructıon on Strategy Use and Academic Achievement, University Of South Alabama.
y.d.t., Alabama
COHEN Louis, MANĠON Lawrence, ve MORRĠSON Keith (2000). Research Methods in
Education, London: Routledge Falmer.
CUNNINGHAM Roger T., ve TURGUT M. Fuat (1996). Ġlköğretim Fen Bilgisi Öğretimi, Millî
Eğitimi GeliĢtirme Projesi Deneme Basımı, Ankara.
ÇAĞLAR Aysun (2010). Ġlköğretim Ġkinci Kademe Öğrencilerinin Fen Dersine Yönelik
Tutumları ve Akademik Benlik Kavramları. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Sosyal
Bilimler Enstitüsü, y.y.t., Çanakkale.
ÇALIġKAN Serap ve SELÇUK SEZGĠN Gamze (2010). ―Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Fizik
Problemlerinde Kullandıkları Özdüzenleme Stratejileri: Cinsiyet ve Üniversite Etkileri‖,
Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, S. 27, s. 50-62.
DEEKENS Victor M. (2009). Differences In The Use Of Macro-Level Self-Regulated Learning
Processes Between Students That Gain Declarative Knowledge And Students That Gain
Conceptual Understanding About Complex Science Topics, University of North Carolina
At Chapel Hill, y.y.t., North Carolina
DEGUZMAN Paolo (2008). Effects of Help-Seeking in a Blended High School Biology Class,
University Of Southern California, y.d.t., California
DEMETRIOU Andreas (2005). ―Organization and Development of Self-Understanding and Self-
Regulation: Toward a General Theory‖, Handbook of Self-Regulation, Ed.: Monque
Boekaerts, Paul R. Pintrich, Moshe Zeidner, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, p. 451-502
DINSMORE Daniel L., ALEXANDER Patricia A., ve LOUGHLIN, Sandra M. (2008). ―Focusing
The Conceptual Lens on Metacognition, Self-Regulation, and Self-Regulated Learning‖,
Educational Psychological Review, C. 20, S.4, s.391-409.
278 | G. Ilgaz, A. Gül
Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 2014, 33(1), 261-287
EĞĠTĠMĠ ARAġTIRMA VE GELĠġTĠRME DAĠRESĠ (2007). ÖBBS 2005: Ġlköğretim
Öğrencilerinin BaĢarılarının Belirlenmesi: Fen Bilgisi Raporu, Ankara
EĞĠTĠMĠ ARAġTIRMA VE GELĠġTĠRME DAĠRESĠ (2009). ÖBBS 2008: Ġlköğretim
Öğrencilerinin BaĢarılarının Belirlenmesi: Fen ve Teknoloji Raporu, Ankara
FETTAHLIOĞLU Pınar, ÇIBIK AyĢe Sert, ILGAZ Gökhan ve EKICI Gülay (2009). ―The
Predictive Power of Learning Strategies Based on Self-Regulation on The Academic
Success in Science and Technology Course‖, ESERA 2009 Conference, August 31st -
September 4th 2009. Ġstanbul-Turkey.
FĠDAN DĠġĠKĠTLĠ AyĢegül (2011). Ġlköğretim 7. ve 8. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Fen ve Teknoloji
Dersine Yönelik Tutumları ile Fen ve Teknoloji Dersi BaĢarıları Arasındaki ĠliĢki,
Selçuk Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimler Enstitüsü, y.y.t., Konya.
GÖMLEKSIZ Mehmet Nuri, DEMIRALP Demet. (2012). ―Öğretmen Adaylarının Öz-
Düzenleyici Öğrenme Becerilerine ĠliĢkin GörüĢlerinin ÇeĢitli DeğiĢkenler Açısından
Değerlendirilmesi‖, Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, C.11, S.3, s. 777 -795.
GÜCÜBAġ Özge (2012). Öz-Düzenleme Becerisi ve Yapılandırmacı DüĢünme: Ġlköğretim
Öğrencileri Kapsamında Bir Yapısal EĢitlik Modelleme ÇalıĢması, EskiĢehir Osmangazi
Üniversitesi, Eğitimi Bilimleri Enstitüsü, y.y.t., EskiĢehir.
GÜRġĠMġEK IĢık (2002). ―Öğretmen Adaylarında Öğrenmeye ĠliĢkin Motivasyonel Ġnançlar Ve
Strateji Kullanımı‖, Muğla Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, 8.
GÜVENÇ Hülya ve AÇIKGÖZ Kamile Ün (2007). ―ĠĢbirlikli Öğrenme Ve Kavram
Haritalamanın Öğrenme Stratejisi Kullanımı Üzerindeki Etkileri‖, Kuram ve Uygulamada
Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, C.7, S.1, s. 117–127.
GÜVENÇ Hülya (2011). ―ÇalıĢma Günlüklerinin 6. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Öz Düzenlemeli
Öğrenmeleri Üzerindeki Etkileri‖, Hacettepe Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, S. 41, 206-218.
HAġLAMAN Tülin ve AġKAR Petek (2007). ―Programlama Dersi Ġle Ġlgili Öz-Düzenleyici
Öğrenme Stratejileri Ve BaĢarı Arasındaki ĠliĢkinin Ġncelenmesi‖, Hacettepe Üniversitesi
Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, S.32, s. 110-122.
HOOPER Daire, COUGHLAN Joseph, ve MULLEN Michael R. (2008). ―Structural Equation
Modelling: Guidelines For Determining Model Fit‖, Electronic Journal Of Business
Research Methods, S: 6(1), s. 53–60. (ET: 04.06.2010), http://www.ejbrm.com/vol6/v6-
i1/Hooperetal.pdf.
HU Li-Tzw ve Peter M BENTLER (1995). ―Evaluating Model Fit‖, Structural Equation
Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications, Ed.: Rick H. Hoyle, Newbury Park, CA:
Sage, p. 76-99
ILGAZ Gökhan (2006). Ġlköğretim II. Kademe Öğrencilerinin Fen Bilgisi Dersine Yönelik
Tutumları ve Kullandıkları Öğrenme Stratejileri, Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler
Enstitüsü, y.y.t., Edirne.
ĠNAN Banu ve YÜKSEL Doğan (2010). ―Self-Regulated Learning: How Is It Applied as a Part of
Teacher Training Through Diary Studies?‖, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, S. 3,
s. 116–120.
ĠSRAEL Eli (2007). Öz-Düzenleme Eğitimi, Fen BaĢarısı ve Öz-Yeterlilik, Dokuz Eylül
Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, y.y.t., Ġzmir.
Öz-Düzenlemeli Öğrenme Stratejileri | 279
ISSN: 1300-302X © 2014 OMÜ EĞĠTĠM FAKÜLTESĠ
JOO Young-Ju, BONG Mimi, ve CHOI Ha-Jeen. (2000). ―Self-Efficacy for Self-Regulated
Learning, Academic Self-Efficacy, and Internet Self-Efficacy in Web-Based Instruction‖,
Educational Technology Research and Development, C. 48, S. 2, s. 5–17.
KADIOĞLU Cansel, UZUNTIRYAKI, Esen ve ÇAPA AYDIN YeĢim. (2011). ―Development of
Self-Regulatory Strategies Scale‖, Education and Science, C. 36, S.160, s. 11-23.
KARADENĠZ ġirin, BÜYÜKÖZTÜRK ġener, AKGÜN Özcan Erkan, KILIÇ-ÇAKMAK Ebru ve
DEMĠREL Funda. (2008). The Turkish Adaptation Study of Motivated Strategies for
Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) For 12–18 Year Old Children: Results of Confirmatory
Factor Analysis. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, C.7, S.4, s. 108-
117, (ET: 04.06.2010), http://www.tojet.net/articles/v7i4/ 7412.pdf
KARASAR Niyazi (2006). Bilimsel AraĢtırma Yöntemi. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
KAYAN FADLELMULA Fatma. (2011). A Structural Model on 7th Grade Students‟
Motivational Beliefs, Use of Self-Regulation Strategies, and Mathematics Achievement,
Middle East Technical University, The Graduate School of Social Sciences, y.d.t., Ankara.
KILIÇ ÇAKMAK Ebru, AKGÜN Özcan Erkan, KARADENIZ ġirin, BÜYÜKÖZTÜRK ġener ve
DEMIREL Funda (2008). ―Ġlköğretim Ikinci Kademe ve Lise Öğrencilerinin Ders ve Sınıf
Düzeylerine göre Öğrenme Stratejileri ve Güdülenme Düzeylerinin Belirlenmesi‖,
Uluslararası Ġnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, C.5, S. 1, s. 1-27.
KISTNER Saskia, RAKOCZY Katrin, OTTO Barbara, DĠGNATH-VAN EWIJK Charlotte,
BÜTTNER Gerhard ve KLIEME Eckhard (2010). ―Promotion of Self-Regulated Learning in
Classrooms: Investigating Frequency, Quality, and Consequences for Student
Performance‖, Metacognition and Learning, C. 5, S. 2, s. 157-171.
KITSANTAS Anastasia ve ZIMMERMAN Barry J. (2009). ―College Students‘ Homework and
Academic Achievement: The Mediating Role of Self-Regulatory Beliefs‖, Metacognition
and Learning, C. 4, S. 2, s. 1556–1623.
KLINE Rex B. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, New York:
Guilford Press.
LEUTWYLER Bruno (2009). ―Metacognitive Learning Strategies: Differential Development
Patterns in High School‖, Metacognition and Learning, C. 4, S. 2, s. 111–123.
LIU Ou Lydia (2009). ―Evaluation of a Learning Strategies Scale for Middle School Students‖,
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, C. 27, S. 4, s. 312-321.
MANDACI ġAHĠN Seher (2010). ―Sınıf Öğretmeni Adaylarının Matematik Öğretimi
Derslerindeki Akademik BaĢarıları ile Öz Düzenleme Becerileri Arasındaki ĠliĢki‖, e-
Journal of New World Sciences Academy Education Sciences, C.5, S.3, s. 1370-1381.
MEECE Judith L., WIGFIELD Allan ve ECCLES Jacquelynne S. (1990). ―Predictors of Math
Anxiety and Its Influence on Young Adolescents‘ Course Enrollment Intentions and
Performance in Mathematics‖, Journal of Educational Psychology, C. 82, S. 1s, s. 60–70.
MĠLLĠ EĞĠTĠM BAKANLIĞI (2006). Ġlköğretim Fen Ve Teknoloji Dersi (6, 7 Ve 8. Sınıflar)
Öğretim Programı. MEB Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu BaĢkanlığı. Ankara
NIEMIVIRTA Markku (1997). ―Gender Differences in Motivation-Cognitive Patterns of Self-
Regulated Learning‖, The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research
Association, 24–28 March, Chicago, IL
ÖZDAMAR Kazım (2004). Paket Programlar ile Ġstatistiksel Veri Analizi-1, EskiĢehir : Kaan
Yayıncılık.
280 | G. Ilgaz, A. Gül
Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 2014, 33(1), 261-287
ÖZKAN ġule (2008). Modeling Elementary Students‟ Science Achievement: The
Interrelationships among Epistemological Beliefs, Learning Approaches, And Self-
Regulated Learning Strategies, Middle East Technical University, The Graduate School of
Social Science, y.y.t., Ankara.
ÖZTÜRK BarıĢ, BULUT Safure ve KOÇ Yusuf. (2007). ―Motivation and Self-Regulation in
Mathematics‖, Academic Exchange Quarterly, C.11, S. 1, s.149-154.
PAJARES Frank (2002). ―Gender and Perceived Self-Efficacy in Self-Regulated Learning‖,
Theory Into Practice, C. 41, S. 2, s. 116-125.
PALLANT Julie (2003). SPSS Survival Manual, Berkshire: Open University Press.
PINTRICH Paul R. (1999). ―The Role of Motivation in Promoting and Sustaining Self-Regulated
Learning‖, International Journal of Educational Research, C. 31, S. 6, s. 459-470.
PINTRICH Paul R. (2005). ―The Role of Goal Orientation in Self-Regulated Learning‖, ―In M.
Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich And M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook Of Self-Regulation Handbook
of Self-Regulation, Ed.: Monque Boekaerts, Paul R. Pintrich, Moshe Zeidner, San Diego,
CA: Academic Press, p. 451-502.
PINTRICH Paul R., SMITH David A., GARCIA Teresa ve MCKEACHIE Wilbert J. (1991). A
manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann
Arbor, MI: NCRIPTAL, School of Education, The University of Michigan.
POKAY Patricia, ve BLUMENFELD Phyllis C. (1990). ―Predicting Achievement Early and Late
in the Semester: The Role of Motivation and Use of Learning Strategies‖, Journal Of
Educational Psychology, C. 82, S. 1, s. 41-50.
RAFFAELLI Marcela, CROCKET Lisa ve SHEN Yuh-Ling (2005). ―Developmental Stability and
Change in Self-Regulation from Childhood to Adolescence‖, Journal of Genetic
Psychology, C. 166, S.1, s. 54–75.
ROBISON Katherine Arnold (2002). Student Perceptions Of Middle School: Relation To
Academic Motivation, Learning Strategies, And Academic Achievement In Science, The
Graduate School Tulane University, y.d.t.
SAĞIRLI ÖZTURAN Meryem ve AZAPAĞASI Esra (2009). “Üniversite Öğrencilerinin
Öğrenmede Öz-Düzenlemeyi Öğrenme Becerilerinin Ġncelenmesi‖, Ankara Üniversitesi
Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, C. 42, S. 2, s. 129-161.
SAĞIRLI ÖZTURAN Meryem, ÇĠLTAġ Alper, AZAPAĞASI Esra ve ZEHĠR Kıymet (2010).
―Yüksek Öğretimin Öz Düzenlemeyi Öğrenme Becerilerine Etkisi‖, Kastamonu Eğitim
Dergisi, C. 18, S. 2, s. 587-596.
SARIER Yılmaz (2010). ―Ortaöğretime GiriĢ Sınavları (OKS-SBS) ve PISA Sonuçları IĢığında
Eğitimde Fırsat EĢitliğinin Değerlendirilmesi‖, Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi
Dergisi, C. 11, S. 3, s. 107-129.
SCHRAW Gregory, CRIPPEN Kent J. ve HARTLEY Kendall (2006). ―Promoting Self-Regulation
In Science Education: Metacognition As Part Of A Broader Perspective On Learning‖,
Research in Science Education, C. 36, S.1-2, s. 111–139.
SCHRAW Gregory ve DENNISON Rayne Sperling (1994). ―Assessing Metacognitive
Awareness‖, Contemporary Educational Psychology, C. 19, S. 4, s. 460–475.
SCHUMACKER Randall E. ve LOMAX Richard G. (2004). A Beginner‘s Guide to Structural
Equation Modeling, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Öz-Düzenlemeli Öğrenme Stratejileri | 281
ISSN: 1300-302X © 2014 OMÜ EĞĠTĠM FAKÜLTESĠ
SENEMOĞLU Nuray (2004). GeliĢim, Öğrenme ve Öğretim; Kuramdan Uygulama, Ankara:
Gazi Kitapevi.
SHEKAR Aruna (2007). ―Active Learning and Reflection in Product Development Engineering
Education‖, European Journal of Engineering Education, C. 2, S. 32, s. 125–133.
SINATRA Gale M ve TAASOOBSHIRAZI Gita (2011). ―Intentional Conceptual Change: The
Self-Regulation of Science Learning‖, Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and
Performance, Ed.: Barry J. Zimmerman ve Dale Shunk, New York, NY: Routledge, s.203–
216.
STAUDT Linda E. (1995). Self-Regulated Learning Strategies: Their Relation to Academic
Performance and Self-Efficacy in Chemistry and English, Windsor University, y.d.t.
SUN Jun (2005). ―Assessing Goodness of Fit In Confirmatory Factor Analysis‖, Measurement
and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, C. 37, S.4, s. 240-256.
SUNGUR Semra (2004). An Implementation of Problem Based Learning in High School
Biology Courses, Middle East Technical University The Graduate School of Social
Sciences, y.d.t., Ankara
SUNGUR Semra ve GÜNGÖREN ġahin. (2009). ―The Role of Classroom Environment
Perceptions in Self-Regulated Learning and Science Achievement‖, Elementary Education
Online, C. 8, S. 3, s. 883–900
SUNGUR Semra ve TEKKAYA Ceren. (2006). ―Effects of Problem-Based Learning and
Traditional Instruction on Self-Regulated Learning‖, The Journal of Educational Research,
C.99, S.5, s. 307-320.
SÜMER Nebi (2000). ―Yapısal EĢitlik Modelleri‖, Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, C.3, S.6, s.49-74.
TEKBIYIK Ahmet, CAMADAN Fatih ve GÜLAY Ahmet (2013). ―Fen Ve Teknoloji Dersinde
Akademik BaĢarının Yordayıcısı Olarak Öz Düzenleyici Öğrenme Stratejileri‖, Turkish
Studies - International Periodical for The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish
or Turkic, C. 8, S. 3, s: 567-582.
TEKĠN Halil (1993). Eğitimde Ölçme ve Değerlendirme, Ankara: Yargı Yayınevi.
THOMAS Gregory P. (2003). ―Conceptualisation, Development and Validation of An
Instrument for Investigating the Metacognitive Orientation of Science Classroom Learning
Environments: The Metacognitive Orientation Learning Environment Scale-Science
(MOLES-S)‖, Learning Environments Research, C. 6, S. 2, s. 175-197.
TURAN Sevgi, DEMĠREL Özcan ve SAYEL Ġskender (2009). ―Metacognitive Awareness and
Self-regulated Learning Skills of Medical Students in Different‖, Medical Curricula, Med
Teac, S.31, s. 477–483
ÜREDĠ IĢıl ve ÜREDĠ Lütfi (2005). ―Ġlköğretim Sekizinci Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Öz-Düzenleme
Stratejileri ve Motivasyonel Inançlarının Matematik BaĢarısını Yordamadaki Gücü‖,
Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, C. 1, S. 2, s. 250-260.
VALLE Antonio, NÚÑEZ José Carlos, CABANACH Ramón G., GONZÁLEZ-PIENDA Julio
Antonio, RODRÍGUEZ Susana., ROSÁRIO Pedro, CEREZO Rebeca ve MUÑOZCADAVID
María A. (2008). ―Self-Regulated Profiles and Academic Achievement‖,
Psicothema, C. 20, S. 4, s. 724–731.
WESTON Rebecca ve GORE Paul A. Jr. (2006). ―A Brief Guide To Structural Equation
Modeling‖, The Counseling Psychologist, C. 34, S. 5, s. 719-751.
282 | G. Ilgaz, A. Gül
Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 2014, 33(1), 261-287
WINNE Philip H. (2001). ―Self-Regulated Learning Viewed from Models of Information
Processing‖, Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical
Perspectives, Ed.: Barry J. Zimmerman ve Dale H. Schunk Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum, pp. 153-189
WOLTERS Christopher A. (1999). ―The Relation between High School Students‘ Motivational
Regulation and Their Use of Learning Strategies, Effort, and Classroom Performance‖,
Learning and Individual Differences, C. 11, S. 3, s. 218-299.
YAMAÇ Ahmet (2011). Ġlköğretim BeĢinci Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Öz-Düzenleyici Öğrenme
Stratejileri ile Matematiğe Yönelik Tutum ve BaĢarıları Arasındaki ĠliĢkilerin
Ġncelenmesi, Afyon Kocatepe Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, y.y.t., Afyonkarahisar
YILDIZ Eylem, AKPINAR Ercan, TATAR Nilgün ve ERGĠN Ömer (2009). ―Ġlköğretim
Öğrencileri Için GeliĢtirilen BiliĢ Üstü Ölçeği‘nin Açımlayıcı ve Doğrulayıcı Faktör
Analizi‖, Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, C. 9, S. 3, s. 1573-1604.
YUMUġAK Necmettin, SUNGUR Semra ve ÇAKIROĞLU Jale (2007). ―Turkish High School
Students‘ Biology Achievement in Relation to Academic Self-Regulation‖, Educational
Research and Evaluation, S: 13(1), s. 53-69.
ZEIDNER Moshe, BOEKAERTS Monique, ve PINTRICH Paul R. (2005). ―Self-Regulation:
Directions and Challenges for Future Research‖, Handbook of Self-Regulation, Ed.:
Monique Boekaerts, Paul R. Pintrich and Moshe Zeidner, San Diego, CA: Academic Press,
p. 749-768.
ZIMMERMAN Barry J. (1989). ―A Social Cognitive View of Self-Regulated Academic Learning‖,
Journal of Educational Psychology, C. 81, S. 3, s. 329-339.
ZIMMERMAN Barry J. (1990). ―Self-Regulated Learning And Academic Achievement: An
Overview‖, Educational Psychologist, C. 25, S. 1, s. 3-17.
ZIMMERMAN Barry J. (2005). ―Attaining Self-Regulation: A Social Cognitive Perspective‖,
Handbook of Self-Regulation, Ed.: Mosha Boekaerts, Paul R. Pintrich and Moshe Zeidner,
San Diego, CA: Academic Press, p. 13-39.
ZIMMERMAN Barry J. ve MARTINEZ-PONS Manuel (1990). ―Student Differences In Self-
Regulated Learning: Relating Grade, Sex, And Giftedness To Self-Efficacy And Strategy
Use‖, Journal Of Educational Psychology, C. 82, S. 1, s. 51-59.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com