Journal Name:
- Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi
| Author Name |
|---|
Abstract (2. Language):
As many cases in the history of urbanization in the East and West,
relations between the centre and the periphery represent unilateral
transactions. This was also the case in Cyprus. The Island with its strategic
position in the eastern Mediterranean became the scene for many
conquests, some of which were stabilized as long lasting administrations.
Thus, the central powers had the opportunity to import and disseminate
their architectural preferences.
After the collapse of the Byzantine domination, it was during the crusades
that medieval Europeans discovered the importance of Cyprus as a
strategic island. Feudal administrations founded in Syria and Antioch, as
well as in Edessa County, were organized in order to control the military
and commercial routes through the landownership. Among the crusaders,
a French dynasty called the Lusignans, the nobles of a minor degree,
colonized Cyprus, imitating the Frankish political and religious
institutions. During the Lusignan period (1192-1473), two cathedrals and
several churches were constructed in the manner of the French Gothic
style, especially in Nicosia and Famagusta; as well as palaces, monasteries
and other religious edifices which were allocated to different communities
and sects. The primary emphasis of the Lusignans was to convert the
Island into a naval base of the Catholics.
There ruled other sea powers in Cyprus: the Genovese occupied the Island
in 1373; Mamlukes plundered the cities in 1426. Finally the Venetians took
the land (1489) to fortify their naval dominance. Using the contemporary
military engineering methods imported to Cyprus around 1490s,
triangular bastions were added around the Nicosia walls, to defend the
city against possible Ottoman attacks. Administrative palaces in
Famagusta and Nicosia, as well as private residences, all richly
ornamented in the Venetian Renaissance style, contributed to the Island’s architectural substance. The coats of arms of St. Mark’s Republic, some of
which can still be observed on the historical fortress walls of Famagusta
and Nicosia, reflected one of the invincible powers of the Mediterranean
basin (1).
After the conquest of Nicosia in 1570 by Lala Mustafa Pasha, Ottomans
built a row of strongholds and fortifications established foremost at the
southern shores of the Island, such as in Larnaca, Baphos and Limassol.
Nicosia appeared as an important commercial centre on the eastern
Mediterranean trade routes, between Egypt and Caramania on the northsouth
direction, as well as between the Syrian ports and the western part
of the Mediterranean. Ottomans brought in their life style, molded in the
economic domain, as they did in other provinces. Majority of public
structures in Nicosia displayed a religious character. Main mosques were
converted from the Gothic churches, and educational institutions, namely
the medreses, had been established around the mosques. The “founding
pashas”, who conquered the Island or who ruled in the early period of the
Ottoman administration, besides converting cathedrals and churches into
mosques, established charitable foundations in towns, organized the
transportation of immigrants from Anatolia in order to increase the
Muslim population and developed certain measures for improving the
economic situation on the Island. Commercial buildings, such as
Kumarcýlar Haný, Büyük Han, Bedesten, stores, shopping streets and
numerous shops of the artisans in Nicosia, attest to the development of
economic facilities (2). Evidently, the charitable foundation (waqf)
organization in Cyprus sustained close ties with economic and social life.
Charitable works provided the basis for the foundation of a residential
quarter. The cultural effect of the waqf appeared as a means in the
transfer of the Ottoman social system produced in the centre to the
provinces. Typical plans of the Ottoman traditional architecture, such as
public bath, fountain or tekke, sustained in Cypriot towns as significant
products of the social life.
The transfer from the centre to the periphery went on with the British
regime in the late nineteenth century. The colonial administration brought
some measures related to the British overseas interest, as well as their life
style. Cypriot architecture was inevitably influenced by the current
developments. The railroad system, post offices and storehouses reflected
the British emphasis on the communication systems and the naval trade.
Educational activities also represented rulers’ aspirations. First, medrese
institution as an integral part of the charitable foundation belonged to the
Ottoman traditional life style. The Ottoman administrators took the
traditional medrese as an inevitable device for public instruction. Later,
modernizing efforts in the educational area extended far to the distant
provinces of the Empire. Between 1882 and 1908, construction of school
buildings was realized and disseminated from Rumelia to Iraq. In this
period, a concern for the education of women was seriously taken into
consideration.
This study deals with the architectural characteristics of the schools in
Nicosia, built during the late nineteenth and the early twentieth century.
The Ottoman administration, though replaced by the British control,
continued to exert its influence on the social life of the Muslim
inhabitants. This new situation was not without an Ottoman accent. The
degree of the gradual change in the school architecture, as influenced by the educational thoughts and architecture of the two countries, which imposed their styles on the Island, appears as a question. Apart from
stylistic details, also the intra-mural urban development represented a
unique character. (Figure 1)
The British city plan which was prepared by the Colonial Land
Registration and Survey Department (CLRS) in 1927, was apparently
revised later, but provides an important documentary source to help
examine the problem. Intending to include the Muslim and Greek
quarters within the city walls, the city plan was arranged as a portfolio,
where buildings were shown as to note the original identifications (3).
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF):
- 1-2
33-66