Buradasınız

İKİ KENTİN ÖYKÜSÜ: ANTİK POMPEİİ VE HERCULANEUM’UN KEŞFİ

A TALE OF TWO CITIES: IN SEARCH FOR ANCIENT POMPEII AND HERCULANEUM

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
The ancient and modern are often juxtaposed in an inseparable way in cities which are continuously inhabited since their foundation in antiquity. The architectural splendor of ancient Rome for example, is visible and traceable in several fragmented contexts in the heart of modern Rome; remains of ancient architecture are embraced and invaded by the modern city that grew around and over the ruins of its ancient counterpart. In only rare instances, such as the Pantheon, the Markets of Trajan and the Colosseum, or the impressive façade of the Temple of Zeus inserted into a later building, is it possible to see the monuments that once adorned ancient Rome still standing to their full height. The remains of many other ancient cities on the other hand, are found at a distance from nearby modern settlements and are not encroached by buildings. These ancient cities are actually more potent in revealing and displaying the ancient urban context in an un-fragmented state. Yet the fact that these are often not well preserved and that large portions remain unexcavated hinder that potential, and to an untrained eye, the ancient city often looks like a spread of ruins. While monuments like theaters or baths are in general well preserved and might partially stand to their full height, the ‘ancient city’ is often conceived as a walking track with a collection of building stones. In several cases the remains of buildings whose walls are rarely preserved to their full height do not give a sense of how they once looked like. Finding a still standing ancient building, let alone an ancient city, and wandering inside, therefore, is not a common experience. Renowned for their superb preservation, Pompeii and Herculaneum are two exceptional examples. The archaeological character and context of these two ancient cities, especially those of Pompeii, are exceptional in many respects: Pompeii occupies a special place in Roman archaeology, for this city and its neighbors, notably Herculaneum, were remarkably well preserved under the volcanic debris that rained down from Mount Vesuvius in AD 79. The ruins give an unequalled glimpse of the daily life of town dwellers during late republic and early Empire. In contrast, in Rome itself, because of continuing rebuilding throughout the Empire, remains from these periods are only sporadically preserved (Gates, 2003, 343). The fact that it was destroyed by a single natural disaster which rendered it largely (though not totally) inaccessible to the survivors and to succeeding generations means that what we have has not been altered, by later demolition, by the construction of buildings of later generations, and that by uncovering it what has been discovered is a unity, fixed in time. We can see Pompeii as it was on that fateful day, whereas all the other cities in this book are only partial survivals, with buildings and other evidence often belonging to widely separate periods in their existence (Tomlinson, 1992, 175). The on-going excavations in both cities brought to light not just individual buildings and artifacts but an urban fabric (Figure 1)(*). In both towns not only monumental public buildings, as is often the case in several sites, but houses, streets, public buildings, commercial units, drainage channels, fountains, wells, city walls, cemeteries, parks and even some unfortunate inhabitants are unearthed (1)(Figure 2). In many areas the remains are preserved well up to their first storey, in some even up to the second, thus displaying the actual building size and appearance (Figure 3). This is truly a rare case where both the public buildings and the private architecture of two neighboring ancient cities are uncovered in such a big scale and with such intensity. Unearthing and revealing such a vast and almost intact ancient context is an unusual phenomenon and has a remarkable history (2). The excavation history of Pompeii and Herculaneum is a complex and long narrative displaying the gradual progress in not only the archaeological uncovering of an ancient urban context in its entirety but also in methods, objectives and documentation of this vast exposure (3). This paper offers an informative insight into the first epoch of the excavations undertaken in Pompeii, Herculaneum and the nearby sites in the 18th century and illustrates the dynamics of excavation in the early Bourbon Period during which the digging narrative of Vesuvian archaeology was initiated; within the limits of an article it would be unfair to attempt to cover the entirety of this long, complicated and still evolving tale narrated by several events and actors.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Antik Pompeii ve Herculaneum kentleri İS 79 yılında patlayan Vezüv yanardağının püskürttüğü lavlardan oluşan kalın bir tabaka ile örtülmüş ve doğal bir koruma altına alınmıştır. Bu korunmuşluk düzeyi, diğer antik ören yerleri ile kıyaslandığında, benzersiz bir bağlam oluşturmaktadır. Hem Pompeii ve Herculaneum hem de yanardağın püskürtme menzilinde bulunan diğer bazı kentler ve kırsal yerleşimlerin sonunu getiren bu doğal afet, ironik bir şekilde klasik arkeoloji biliminin doğuşuna ve gelişimine yol açmış bir olay olarak da görülebilir. İS 17. yüzyılda tesadüfen keşfedilen Pompeii ve Herculaneum aynı zamanda ilk arkeolojik kazı çalışmalarının yapıldığı antik kentlerdendir. Kazı ve araştırma çalışmalarının halen devam ettiği bu iki kentteki kazı tarihçesi yaklaşık üç yüzyılı kapsayan uzun ve karmaşık bir sürece yayılmaktadır. Bu sürecin oluşum ve gelişiminde bazı olay ve kişiler etkin ve belirleyici bir rol oynamıştır. Bu makale her iki kentte yapılmış olan arkeolojik kazıların ilk dönemi olan 18. yüzyıla odaklanmakta ve erken Bourbon hanedanı hamiliğinde gerçekleştirilen kazı çalışmaları hakkında bilgilendirici bir çerçeve sunmaktadır. Bu çerçeve içinde ilk kazıcılar, ilk kazıların niteliği ve amacı, ilk kazı ve belgeleme metodlarının oluşumu, gelişimi ve değişimi ve buluntu yayınlarının niteliği, amacı ve kapsamı ele alınmaktadır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
1-25

REFERENCES

References: 

ALLISON, P. M. (2004) Pompeian Households, An Analysis of the Material
Culture, Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, Monograph 42, University
of California, Los Angeles.
BALDASSARE CONTICELLO (1990) Rediscovering Pompeii, Rediscovering
Pompeii, eds. L. F. Dell’Orto and A. Varone, L’Erma di Bretschneider,
Rome; 3-25.
BERGMANN, B. (1994) The Roman House as Memory Theater: The House
of the Tragic Poet in Pompeii, Art Bulletin (76) 225-256.
BERRY, J. (1998) Unpeeling Pompeii, Studies in Region 1 of Pompeii, Milan,
Electa.
BINFORD, L. R. (1981) Behavioral Archaeology and the Pompeii Premise,
Journal of Anthropological Research (37:3) 195-208.
BISEL, S. (1986) The People of Herculaneum AD 79, Helmantica (37) 11-23.
BOLOGNA, F. (1990) The Rediscovery of Herculaneum and Pompeii in the
Artistic Culture of Europe in the Eighteenth Century, Rediscovering
Pompeii, eds. L. F. Dell’Orto and A. Varone, Rome, L’Erma di
Bretschneider; 80-91.
BRION, M. (1960) Pompeii and Herculaneum, The Glory and the Grief, tr. J.
Rosenberg, Crown Publishers, New York.
CAPASSO, G. (2003) Journey to Pompei, Virtual Tours around the Lost City,
Capware, Naples.
CLARKE, J. R. (1991) The Houses of Roman Italy. 100 BC- AD 25, Ritual, Space
and Decoration, University of California Press, Berkeley.
CLARKE, J. R. (1998) Looking at Lovemaking, Constructions of Sexuality in
Roman Art, 100 BC –AD 250, University of California Press, Berkeley.
CLARKE, J. R. (2003) Art in Lives of Ordinary Romans, Visual Representation
and Non-Elite Viewers in Italy, 100 BC-AD 315, Berkeley, University of
California Press.
COOLEY, A. (2003) Pompeii, Duckworth, London.
De CARO, S., ed. (2000) The Secret Cabinet in the National Archaeological
Museum of Naples, Soprintendenza archeologica di Napoli e Caserta,
Naples.
DELL’ORTO, L. F., VARONE, A., eds. (1990) Rediscovering Pompeii, L’Erma
di Bretschneider, Rome.DELLA CORTE (1925) Pompeji, The New Excavations (houses and
inhabitants), Valle di Pompei, Tipografia di Francesco Sicignano.
DEISS, J. J. (1995) The Town of Hercules, A Buried Treasure Trove, Malibu, The
J. Paul Getty Museum, California.
FREDRICK, D. (1995) Beyond the Atrium to Ariadne: Erotic Painting and
Visual Pleasure in the Roman House, Classical Antiquity (14:2) 266-
287.
FULFORD, M., WALLACE-HADRILL, A. (1998) Unpeeling Pompeii,
Antiquity (72) 128-145.
GARDNER COATES, V. C., SEYDL, J. L. (2007) Antiquity Recovered, The
Legacy of Pompeii and Herculaneum, The J. Paul Getty Museum, Los
Angeles.
GATES, C. (2003) Ancient Cities, The Archaeology of Urban Life in the Ancient
near East and Egypt, Greece and Rome, Routledge, London.
GRAHAME, M. (1997) Public and Private in the Roman House:
investigating the social order of the Casa del Fauno, Domestic Space in
the Roman World: Pompeii and Beyond (Journal of Roman Archaeology
Supplement 22, eds. R. Laurence and A. Wallace-Hadrill,
Portsmouth, Rhode Island; 137-164.
JANSEN, G. C. M. (1991) Water and Sanitation Systems in the Houses of
Herculaneum, Meddelingen Nederlands Instituut te Rome (50) 145-166.
JASHEMSKI, W. F., MEYER, F. G., eds. (2002) The Natural History of
Pompeii, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
LA ROCCA, E., de VOS, M. E. (2002) Pompeii, Milan, Mondadori.
LAURENCE, R., WALLACE-HADRILL, A., eds. (1997) Domestic Space in
the Roman World: Pompeii and Beyond (Journal of Roman Archaeology
Supplement 22), Portsmouth, Rhode Island.
MAU, A. (1982) Pompeii, Its Life and Art, tr. by F. W. Kelsey (originally
published in German in 1902), Caratzas Brothers Publishers, New
Rochelle and New York.
MAIURI, A. (1945) Herculaneum, tr. by V. Priestley, La Libreria dello Stato,
Rome.
MAIURI, A. (1953) Pompeii, tr.V. Priestley, La Libreria dello Stato, Rome.
PACKER, J. (1975) Middle and Lower Class Housing in Pompeii
and Herculaneum: A Preliminary Survey, Neue Forschungen in
Pompeji, eds. Andreae and H. Kyrieleis, Verlag Aurel Bongers
Recklinghausen; 133-142.
PARSLOW, C. C. (1995) Rediscovering Antiquity, Karl Weber and the
Excavation of Herculaneum, Pompeii and Stabiae, Cambridge,
Cambridge University Press.
PIRSON, F. (1997) Rented Accommodation at Pompeii: The Evidence of
the Insula Arriana Polliana, v: 6, Domestic Space in the Roman World,
Pompeii and Beyond (Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplement 22),
eds. R. Laurence and A. Wallace-Hadrill, Portsmouth, Rhode Island;
165-181.RAPER, R. A. (1977) The Analysis of the Urban Structure of Pompeii:
A Sociological Examination of Land Use (Semi-micro), Spatial
Archaeology, ed. D. L. Clarke, Academic Press, London; 189-221.
RICHARDSON, L. Jr. (1988) Pompeii, An Architectural History, The Johns
Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London.
SIGURDSSON, H. (2002) Mount Vesuvius before the Disaster, The Natural
History of Pompeii, eds. W. F. Jashemski and F. G. Meyer, Cambridge,
Cambridge University Press; 29-36.
SIGURDSSON, H., CAREY, S. (2002) The Eruption of Vesuvius in AD 79,
The Natural History of Pompeii, eds. W. F. Jashemski and F. G. Meyer,
Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 37-64.
SIGURDSSON, H., CASHDOLLAR, S. and SPARKS, S. R. J. (1982) The
Eruption of Vesuvius in AD 79: Reconstruction from Historical and
Volcanological Evidence, American Journal of Archaeology (86) 39-51.
TOMLINSON, R. (1992) From Mycenae to Constantinople, The Evolution of the
Ancient City, London, Routledge.
TRIGGER, B. G. (1989) A History of Archaeological Thought, Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge.
WALLACE-HADRILL, A. (1994) Houses and Society in Pompeii and
Herculaneum, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
ZANKER, P. (1998) Pompeii. Public and Private Life, tr.. D. L. Schneider,
Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com