SPATIAL CHOICES OF MIDDLE CLASSES
Journal Name:
- Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi
Keywords (Original Language):
Author Name | University of Author |
---|---|
Abstract (2. Language):
Middle classes attracted attention in literature in the recent periods due
to their expanding nature based on new job descriptions depending on
the dynamics of the economy. They had used to have no significance in
classical class schemes apart from being a group stuck in between the
bourgeoisie and proletariat, and performing those jobs that could be
categorized in neither side. However, with changes in the economic order
in recent years, the meaning of work changed along with the variety of
jobs to be performed. It is commonly known that these new conditions are
very much related to technological advance providing heightened mobility
to capital, labour and information. Changes in the regime of capital
accumulation fuelled by new opportunities changed the sphere of work
to a great extent. Developments in the arena of work and employment
are revealed with the changes in the occupational structure and growth
of a white-collar workforce. Apart from a wide range of low paid, and
low skill service sector jobs, a wide variety of management, finance,
technology and service related high level jobs which required high level
training began to be demanded. ‘New middle classes’ came out as a result
of such developments. Defining these newcomers became a central issue
of research in many fields, but their significance came not only of the jobs
they fulfilled or their role in the production sphere. Their consumption
patterns, thus lifestyles became a central issue of interest. This may be
mainly because class in the classical understanding defines a group with
common interests, but these new middle classes did not have any common
goal to fight for. What they had in common was where they stood in the
production sided class schemes, between the upper and lower classes, but
still their jobs were highly varied. In the occupational aggregate approach,
classes are defined by occupational groupings at the expense of other
factors (Akpınar, 2005). However, today, in the new economic climate,
work lost its capacity in shaping people’s lives (2005). Modern society was
a work society according to Offe (1985). However, today in the so-called
postmodern societies, as Offe (1985) suggests, work is less a defining factor
for a person’s identity in a society with fluid, ephemeral, and flexible
working conditions and its loss is filled with other sources for identity
building. Therefore, the recent studies concentrated on the middle classes
searched for alternative factors that could distinguish between different
“groups” within middle classes and their consumption patterns was a
central tool in that. Class, in the economic sense broadly defined where
they stood within society, but was not enough to capture the dynamic and
highly stratified nature of these middle classes. Thus, there was a shift
from ‘production side’ explanations to ‘consumption side’ ones in the
examination of middle class variety (Crompton, 1993).
When the concept of consumption comes into scene, it is suggested that
apart from the material satisfaction that a good consumed gives to a
person, the symbolic qualities have come to be important in the recent
periods (Featherstone, 1991). Thus, what one consumes is not just about
the activity of consuming, but what the consumption of that specific good
suggests about that person. These connotations distinguish the middle class
groups by the notion of “taste”. Choosing to consume things according
to your taste defines your lifestyle and the different worlds of lifestyles
differentiate the middle classes from each other. The role of taste is
discussed mainly based on the work of Bourdieu (1989) who suggests that
taste depends on the economic and cultural capital together. With ‘cultural
capital’ Bourdieu has introduced a concept very widely used in social
sciences especially in the research on middle classes. Also the concept of
‘habitus’ defines a system of dispositions shared by individuals that are
the products of the same conditionings (Crompton, 1993). This concept is
also developed by Bourdieu (1989) in explaining the active formation of
class within the social relations. It is a socialized subjectivity which allows
agents to understand, interpret and act in the social world (Bourdieu,
1989). Naturally such a definition does not leave place to well-defined class
boundaries and acknowledges the active formation of class in everyday
life.
The study that this paper is based on is conducted on two middle class
groups in a comparative manner (Korkmaz Tirkeş, 2007). First of all it
acknowledges the economic class schemes, while applying to the factors
that are introduced in the recent debates on middle classes. Therefore,
middle class variety may be an outcome of their lifestyles, thus choices
of consumption and that these differences may be followed from every
part of a person’s life (or ‘habitus’). Eventually, it can be assumed that
spatial choices may also be taken as a demonstration of those choices and
lifestyles. Based on the theoretical arguments, the study considers ‘spatial
choice’ as a strong sign of middle class differentiation. Therefore, ‘choice
in the urban space’ may be considered as one of the most significant and
bare demonstrations of ‘cultural capital’ and ‘taste’. Since consumption is
regarded as an alternative source of class formation for the middle classes
because of its symbolic connotations, urban space is certainly the everyday
arena where it is possible to display your identity with the things you
consume. The demonstration of identity may vary from an immediate scale
beginning from the way one talks and dresses to the urban scale where one
lives and practices daily activities. Apart from the house and the location
of the house one chooses to live in, urban environment may suggest many
things about a person’s identity as well. It is known that economic capital
restricts the choice of a place to settle within a city due to variations in the
rents of different neighborhoods. However, if not bounded with economic
factors, choosing to live in one part of the city may be very much related
to cultural factors of taste, choice and inevitably ‘habitus’, and the factors
related to social capital. The relationship of cultural factors to urban
spatial choice comes up in the issue of gentrification where the place
that is gentrified usually has a cultural connotation due to a historical
background. According to Savage et al. (1992) ‘gentrification’ is the best
documented contemporary example of this general trend. Here a new
middle class defines itself as a distinct group precisely through residential
conversions and the process of gentrification gives it status (Savage et al.,
1992). It shows that they possess a particular kind of culture and they have
knowledge of history or tradition which provides them the distinction.
Moreover, it can easily be suggested that recent housing producers have
also turned their attention to providing imagery along with the living
environment itself. Houses are marketed under the imagery of a lifestyle
of the target group (1). Therefore, it can be suggested that spatial choice
(in terms of both location within a city and the cultural and symbolic
connotation) is one of the most important lifestyle choices that defines a
middle class group’s position within the urban environment.
Based on this assumption, two middle class settlements in Ankara, one
in Keçiören and one in Çayyolu were targeted in the study in concern
(Korkmaz Tirkeş, 2007). These settlement choices are considered as
the demonstrators of two different lifestyles because of their different
features. One of them is located in the northern part of Ankara, while the
other in the south and this by itself suggests a difference because of the
well-known opposite character of the two parts of the city divided by the
railway lying in the east west direction (Figure 1). In fact this difference is
also documented in Güvenç’s (2001) study where the low-income salaried
tradesman are said to occupy the northern part, the poor at the center and
the wealthy located in the southern part. Therefore, the position of the
respondents in Keçiören is contradictory to the peculiarity of the area. In
terms of their location within the city, the architectural and urban qualities
and historical background, these two places are totally different from each
other. The study searched whether this difference of choice is revealed in
other spatial choices of the two groups in their everyday use of urban space
as well. Along with this survey, the study examined alternative factors
of differentiation suggested for the middle classes, since the two groups
chosen were at similar economic welfare level. Thus, keeping the obvious
effects of the economic capital out of evaluation, the study interrogated
effects of other forms of capital on the differentiation of two middle class
groups in a comparative manner.
Before going on with the outcomes of the research, the specificity of
conducting a study with this kind of method should be noted. For planning
implementations, data from a variety of sources are collected concerning
the urban space. Usually the everyday life activities of urban dwellers are
considered insignificant among this load of data. However, based on the
argument that choices of middle classes affect the direction and manner of
urban development, collecting data of their everyday activities becomes
important. As Tekeli (2000) states everyday life is left behind because of
being routine, repetitive and is seen as unproblematic. In fact social systems
are formed and regenerated based on everyday life practices of the agents.
Considering the agent means inevitably considering the body, the physical
space surrounding it, the capacities of the agent to interact and practice
various activities, thus the uniqueness of space and processes occurring
at a specific time. In modern life the concept of everyday life has become
an object of social structuring and the potentials for subjectivity have been
repressed (Tekeli, 2000). The concept of ‘habitus’ that is integrated to the
study determines the practices, thus works for the processing of everyday
life. It is a notion facilitating the action-structure dialectic. It is a product
of the past, but carries reference to the future (Tekeli, 2000). And most
important of all, it is also historical and local, thus contingent (Tekeli, 2000).
As Pred suggests, ‘place’ itself is a historically contingent process (1981).
These components are interwoven with one another in the formation of
every place or region but they vary with historical circumstances. “Place
is both text and context” (Thrift, 1983). This line of thought also shows
the importance of everyday activities of people in the formation of spatial
assets and how this information is time and place specific. Therefore, it is
important to collect data in a time and space specific manner in order to
capture a moment in the dynamic state of an urban accumulation by trying
to catch some glimpses of the ‘habitus’es of different middle class groups.
This study may be read as introducing an alternative dimension to
location-choice studies that searches for the reasons behind settlement
patterns. It is known that basic theoretical formulations on the issue of
location-choice have been revised to include various factors introduced
with the developments in economy in the recent periods. Initially the
major concern of location-choice theories concentrates on the centrality
of distance of residence from various activities and especially from
workplaces. Location of CBD and sub-centres in relation to residential
areas are known to affect the residential pattern of cities as well as some
other factors like ethnicity, family status, migration and socio-economic
differences. Recently a general trend in deciphering the residential patterns
of cities is through the movement of the wealthy groups to the periphery in
relation to increase in personal mobility, freeing people from the factor of
distance. This study reflects an effort to define, based on which factors the
two groups chosen have come to settle in the specific neighborhoods and
how these affect their activities in urban space. By keeping the economic
welfare constant and assuming equal opportunity in reaching every part
of the city whenever they want to, the study examined everyday practices
instead of hypothesizing with mathematical models. At this point it should
be noted that the study does not have a claim to introduce a general model,
indeed in many respects it suggests a potential failure of general models on
this issue because of the specificity of every locale in question. Here again
there is the demonstration of emphasis on the choices of the agents and the
everyday practice.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language):
Bu yazıda Ankara Çayyolu ve Keçiören’de yerleşik olan iki orta sınıf
grubunun mekansal seçimlerinin kıyaslanmasını konu alan bir çalışma
temel alınmıştır (Korkmaz Tirkeş, 2007). Söz konusu mekansal seçimler,
yerleşilen konut ve mahalle başta olmak üzere, kent mekanında
çeşitli yerlerin ve etkinliklerin tüketimini ve kent mekanına yönelik
değerlendirmelerini kapsamaktadır. Mekansal seçimlerde ekonomik
sermaye farklılığının bilinen etkisi dışında diğer faktörlerin etkisinin
araştırılması amacıyla benzer ekonomik refah seviyesinde iki üst orta
sınıf grubu kıyaslamaya temel olarak seçilmiştir. Bourdieu’cu kültürel
sermaye, sosyal ve sembolik sermayenin orta sınıf farklılaşmasındaki etkisi
ve bunlara bağlı olarak seçilen iki grubun Ankara kent mekanında yer
seçim, mekansal kullanım ve değerlendirme farklılıkları ele alınmıştır. Sınıf
oluşumunda üretim süreçlerinin yanısıra tüketim süreçlerinin etkileri temel
alınarak orta sınıf farklılaşmasında ‘beğeni’ kavramının etkisi ve yaşam
tarzının ayırt edici özelliği tartışılmış ve mekansal beğeni ve seçimlerin de
yaşam tarzının bir sonucu olarak kent mekanının gelişimine ne şekilde etki
edebileceği Ankara özelinde ortaya konmuştur. Kent mekanında yapılan
ve kentte yaşayanların gündelik yaşam pratiklerine ve seçimlerine dayanan
çalışmaların kuram düzeyinde yerel çeşitlilikleri ele almasının önemine
de, Ankara ve Türkiye şartlarına özgü kültürel faktörlerin tartışılmasıyla
değinilmiştir. Yazının kapsamında çalışmanın bulgularının kısıtlı bir
bölümü, çalışmanın yöntemini gereğince açıklamak ve genel sonuçları
tartışmak amacıyla verilmiştir. Burada amaç çalışma hakkında verilen
genel bilgilerle böyle bir yöntem kullanılarak kent çalışmalarında ne tür bir
bakış açısının yakalanabileceğini tartışmaktır.
FULL TEXT (PDF):
- 2
37-59