Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

MİMARLIKTA PARAMETRİK ÜRETKEN SİSTEMLER İLE YARATICI TASARIM ARAŞTIRMALARI

CREATIVE DESIGN EXPLORATION BY PARAMETRIC GENERATIVE SYSTEMS IN ARCHITECTURE

Journal Name:

  • Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2012
DOI: 
10.4305

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This paper discusses parametric design systems as a generative tool in architectural design. Parametric tools are algorithmically based, and therefore offer increased computational control over design geometry during design activity. Their adaptability and responsiveness to changing design criteria and requirements make parametric models especially useful for design exploration in complex and dynamic design settings. In performance based design, parametric control of form is particularly valuable, such that they allow the integration of performance analysis into design synthesis. However, parametric systems are often incorrectly mistaken as an emerging architectural style rather than a computational method, ascribing it a false skin-deep character that overshadows its true merits. Moreover, parametric models come with a price, posing limitations regarding representational flexibility and design complexity, which hinder effective design exploration. A critical awareness on both the potentials and limitations of parametric systems is therefore critical in their effective use during design.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu yazı, üretken bir araç olarak parametrik tasarım sistemlerini tartışmaktadır. Algoritmik altyapıları nedeniyle parametrik sistemler, tasarım geometrisi üzerinde daha etkin sayısal denetim sağlarlar. Değişen tasarım ölçütlerine yanı verebilme özellikleri, parametrik modellerin karmaşık ve dinamik tasarım gereksinimlerini karşılayabilmelerine olanak sağlar. Tasarım sürecinde formun parametrik denetimi, özellikle performansa dayalı tasarımda performans değerlendirmesinin tasarım sentezinde kullanılmasını sağlayabilmesi özelliği ile öne çıkar. Buna rağmen, sayısal bir metot yerine yeni ortaya çıkmakta olan mimari bir stil olarak görülmeleri, parametrik sistemlerin gerçek potansiyelini gölgelemektedir. Ayrıca, parametrik modeller, temsil esnekliği ve tasarım karmaşıklığı konularındaki sınırlılıkları nedeniyle, etkili tasarım araştırmasını aksatabilirler. Bu bağlamda, parametrik sistemlerin potansiyel ve eksiklikleri konusunda eleştirel bir farkındalık oluşturmak, tasarımda verimli olarak kullanılabilmeleri açısından önemlidir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_290_29_pp_207-224.pdf
  • 1
207-224
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

AHLQUIST, S., MENGES, A. (2011) Computational design thinking, in A.
Menges and S. Ahlquist (eds.) Computational design thinking, Wiley.
AISH, R., WOODBURY, R. (2005) Multi-level interaction in parametric
design, in A. Butz, B. Fisher, A. Krüger and P. Oliver (eds.)
SmartGraphics, 5th Int. Symp., SG2005, Lecture Notes in Computer
Science, Springer, Berlin.
AKIN, O. (1990) Computational Design Instruction: Towards a Pedagogy.
Electronic Design Studio; 301-16.
AKIN, O. (2001) Variants in design cognition. Design knowing and learning:
Cognition in design education, 105-124.
AKIN, O. (2004) Three Fundamental Tenets for Architectural Ethics, invited
paper for the ACSA Teacher’s Conference. Cranbrook Academy of Art,
MI.
ARIDA, S. (2004) Contextualizing Generative Design. MSc thesis,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MA.
ARUP, S.O. , JENKINS, R. (1968) The evolution and design of the Concourse at
the Sydney Opera House, Ove Arup and Partners.
BITTERMANN, M. (2009) Intelligent Design Objects (IDO): a cognitive
approach for performance-based design, Delft University of Technology,
Delft, Netherlands.
BITTERMANN, M.S. (2011) A Computational Design System with Cognitive
Features Based on Multi-objective Evolutionary Search with Fuzzy
Information Processing. Design Computing and Cognition’10; 505-24.
BURRY, J.R. (2007) Mindful Spaces: Computational Geometry and the
Conceptual Spaces in which Designers Operate. International Journal of
Architectural Computing, 5:4; 611-24.
BURRY, M. (2011) Scripting Cultures: Architectural Design and Programming.
Wiley.
CHANG, S.K. (2003) Data structures and algorithms. World Scientific River
Edge, London.
CORMEN, T.H. (2001) Introduction to algorithms. The MIT Press.
CROSS, N. (2001a) Design cognition: results from protocol and other empirical
studies of design activity, in C. Eastman, W. Newstatter & M.
McCracken (eds.) Design knowing and learning: cognition in design
education, Elsevier: Oxford, UK.
CROSS, N. (2001b) Designerly ways of knowing: design discipline versus design
science. Design issues, 17:3; 49-55.
DAVIS, D., BURRY, J., BURRY, M. (2011a) Untangling Parametric
Schemata: Enhancing Collaboration through Modular Programming,
in P. Leclercq, A. Heylighen & G. Martin (eds.) Proc. of CAAD Futures
2011: Designing Together, Liege, Belgium.
DAVIS, D., BURRY, M., BURRY, J. (2011b) The flexibility of logic
programming, Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on
CAADRIA. Newcastle, Australia.
DESIGNTOPRODUCTION (2011) Kilden Performing Arts Center, factsheet
2010/12 [WWW document]. URL www.designtoproduction.com
,accessed 20 December 2011.
EISENMAN, P. (1977) House VI, Progressive Architecture, 58; 57-67.
EL-KHALDI, M. (2007) Mapping Boundaries of Generative Systems for Design
Synthesis. MSc thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston,
MA.
GANDELSONAS, M. (1982) From structure to subject: the formation of an
architectural language, Eisenman, P. House X, New York: Rizzoli.
GERBER, D.J. (2007) Parametric practices: models for design exploration in
architecture, PhD thesis, Harvard University.
GERO, J. (1994) Preface, in J. Gero & E. Tyugu (eds.) Formal Design Methods
for CAD. Elsevier: Amsterdam.
HANNA, R., BARBER, T. (2001) An inquiry into computers in design:
attitudes before-attitudes after, Design Studies, 22:3; 255-81.
HAYS, K.M. (2000) Architecture theory since 1968, MIT Press: Cambridge,
MA.
HENSEL, M., MENGES, A. ,WEINSTOCK, M. (2010) Emergent technologies
and design: towards a biological paradigm for architecture, Routledge,
UK.
HUDSON, R., SHEP HERD, P. & HINES, D. (2011) Aviva Stadium: A
case study in integrated parametric design, International Journal of
Architectural Computing, 9:2; 187-204.
JOS, T. (1989) The Model: Antoni Gaudi’s hanging model and its
reconstruction, PhD thesis, Universität Stuttgart, Stuttgart.
KILIAN, A. (2006) Design exploration through bidirectional modeling
of constraints, PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
Boston, MA.
KNIGHT, T. (2000) Shape grammars in education and practice: History and
prospects [WWW document]. URL http://www.mit.edu/~tknight/
IJDC/, accessed 6 December 2011.
KNUTH, D.E. (1997) Art of Computer Programming, Volume 1: Fundamental
Algorithms. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
KOCATÜRK, T., MEDJDOUB, B. (2011) Distributed intelligence in
design,Wiley Online Library.
KOLAREVIC, B. (2003) Digital Morphogenesis, in B. Kolarevic (ed.)
Architecture in the digital age: design and manufacturing, Taylor &
Francis.
LAWSON, B. (1980) How designers think, Architectural Press London.
LEACH, N. (2009) Digital Morphogenesis, Architectural Design, 79:1; 32-7.
LIU, Y.C., CHAKRABARTI, A., BLIGH, T. (2003) Towards an ideal
approach for concept generation, Design Studies, 24:4;341-55.
MEREDITH, M. (2008) Never enough, in M. Meredith, M. Sasaki (eds.)
From control to design: Parametric/algorithmic architecture, Actar-D.
MITCHELL, W.J. (1979) Computer-aided architectural design, Van Nostrand
Reinhold.
MOUSSAVI, F. (2011) Parametric software is no substitute for parametric
thinking., The Architectural Review, http://www.architectural-review.
com/issues/october-2011/parametric-software-is-no-substitute-forparametric-
thinking/8620000.article.
OXMAN, R. (2006) Theory and design in the first digital age, Design Studies,
27:3; 229-65.
OXMAN, R., OXMAN, R. (2010) New Structuralism: Design, Engineering
and Architectural Technologies, Architectural Design, 80:4; 14-23.
SCHEURER, F. (2010) Materializing Complexity, in R. Oxman and
R. Oxman (eds.) New Structuralism: Design, Engineering and
Architectural Technologies, Architectural Design, 80:4.
SCHEURER, F. & STEHLING, H. (2011) Lost in Parameter Space?
Architectural Design, 81:4; 70-79.
SCHUMACHER, P. (2009) Parametricism: A new global style for architecture
and urban design. Architectural Design, 79:4; 14-23.
SHEA, K. (2004) Directed randomness, in N. Leach, D. Turnbull and C.
Williams (eds.) Digital Tectonics, Wiley-Academy, UK.
SHEP HERD, P., HUDSON, R., HINES, D. (2011) Aviva Stadium: A
parametric success. International Journal of Architectural Computing,
9:2, 167-186.
SIMON, H.A. (1969) The sciences of the artificial, MIT Press.
STEHLING, H., SCHEURER, F. (2011) Waved Wooden Wall, in G.R. and S.B.
(eds.) Fabricate: Making Digital Architecture, Riverside Architectural
Press.
TERZIDIS, K. (2011) Algorithmic form, in A. Menges and S. Ahlquist (eds.)
Computational Design Thinking, Wiley.
TURRIN, M., von BUELOW, P. and STOUFFS, R. (2011) Design
explorations of performance driven geometry in architectural
design using parametric modeling and genetic algorithms, Advanced
Engineering Informatics, 25-4; 656-75.
VANUCCI, M. (2008) Open systems: approaching novel parametric domains, in
M. Meredith and M. Sasaki (eds.) From Control to Design: Parametric /
Algorithmic Architecture, Actar.
VINCENT, J. (2009) Biomimetic Patterns in Architectural Design,
Architectural Design, 79:6; 74-81.
WEINSTOCK, M. (2010) The architecture of emergence: the evolution of form in
nature and civilisation, Wiley & Sons, Oxford.
WOODBURY, R. (2010) Elements of parametric design, Routledge, Oxford.
YEOMANS, J. (1973) The Other Taj Mahal: What Happened to the Sydney
Opera House, Longman Australia.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com