Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

ÖĞRENCİ YANILGILARINI VE ANLAMA DÜZEYLERİNİ BELİRLEMEDE KULLANILAN İKİ AŞAMALI TESTLER

Journal Name:

  • Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2003

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
For the past decades, studies about students' understanding have been very popular in Turkey. In these studies multiple choice tests have been frequently used by the researchers in order to identify students' conception. These instruments have some disadvantages for example; do not contain an important part in which students' explanations included. Two-tier diagnostic tests, derived from multiple choices tests, cover some of these disadvantages with its second tiers which require a reason for the multiple choices test. Since this type of tests supply in-depth data about origins of students' misconceptions, it has commonly used in the literature. The aim of this study is to reveal the development stages and analysis process of two-tier tests. To reach this aim, it was tried to give necessary information about where the two-tier tests were used, how the tests were developed, and how the data from the test items were analyzed. In addition, a few examples of two-tier test items about science concepts were presented in this study.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Son yıllarda ülkemizde kavramlarla ilgili yapılan çalışmalar oldukça önemli bir araştırma alanı olarak yerini almaktadır. Öğrencilerin kavram anlama düzeylerini ve yanılgılarını belirlenmesi amacıyla yapılan bu türden çalışmalarda çoktan seçmeli testler, araştırmacılar tarafından sıklıkla kullanılmaktadır. Bu test metodunun öğrencilerin muhakeme yapmasına yönelik herhangi bir içeriğe sahip olmaması gibi önemli bir olumsuzluğu bulunmaktadır. Çoktan seçmeli testlere ikinci bir aşamanın ilave edildiği iki aşamalı testler, öğrencilerin muhtemel yanılgılarının orijiniyle ilgili verilerin elde edilmesini sağlamaktadır. Bu özelliğinden dolayı da kavramlarla ilgili uluslar arası literatürde yapılan çalışmalarda kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışma, iki aşamalı testlerin geliştirilme aşamaları ve analiz süreçlerinin tanıtılması amacıyla yapılmıştır. Bu amaçla çalışmada, iki aşamalı testlerin hangi durumlarda kullanılacağı, nasıl geliştirileceği ve elde edilen verilerin ne şekilde analiz edileceğine ilişkin bilgilere ayrıntılı olarak değinilmiş ve ayrıca fen bilimleri alanında örnek sorular sunulmuştur.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-ogrenci-yanilgilarini-anlama-duzeylerini-belirlemede-kullanilan-iki-asamali-testler.pdf
  • 1
54-69
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Ayas, A. (1995). Fen Bilimlerinde Yeni Program Geliştirme ve Uygulama Teknikleri:
İki Çağdaş Yaklaşımın Değerlendirilmesi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim
Fakültesi Dergisi, 11, 149-155. Ayas, A, Karataş, F. Ö., Ünal, S. ve Çalık, M. (2001;. Gazlar Konusu İle İlgili BDÖ
Yazılımlarının Yeterliliklerinin Araştırılması, Yeni Bin Yılın Başında Türkiye'de
Fen Eğitimi Sempozyumu, Bildiriler Kitabı, s 221-228, İstanbul. Bodner, G.M. (1986). Constructivism: A Theory of Knowledge, Journal of Chemical
Education, 63 (10), 873-878. Bodner, G.M. (1990). Why Good Teaching Fails and Hard-working Students Do
Not Always Succeed?, Spectrum, 28(1), 27-32. Champagne, A. B., Klopfer, L. E. and Anderson, J. H. (1980;. Factors Influencing the
Learning of Classical Mechanics, American Journal of Physics, 48, 9. Coştu, B. (2002). Ortaöğretimin Farklı Seviyelerindeki Öğrencilerin Buharlaşma
Yoğunlaşma ve Kaynama Kavramlarını Anlama Düzeylerine İlişkin Bir Çalışma,
Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, KTÜ Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Trabzon. Doran, R. L., (1972). Misconception of Selected Science Concepts Held by Elementary
School Students, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 9 (2), 127-137. Driver, R., (1989). Students'Conceptions and the Learning of Science, International
Journal of Science Education, 11, 481-490. Driver, R. (1991). The Pupils as Scientist?, Open University Press, Bristol, USA. Driver, R., & Easley, J. (1978). Pupils and paradigms: a review of literature related to
concept development in adolescent science students. Studies in Science
Education, 5, 61-84.
Champagne, A. D., Gunstone, R. F., Klopfer, L. E. (1983). Naive Knowledge and Science Learning, Research in Science and Technology Education, 1(2), 173¬183.
Ebenezer, J.V. & Fraser, D.M. (2001). First Year Chemical Engineering Students' Conceptions of Energy in Solution Process: Phenomenographic Categories for Common Knowledge Construction. Science Education, 85, 509-535.
Garnett, P.J. & Treagust, D.F. (1992). Conceptual Difficulties Experienced by Senior High School Students of Chemistry: Electrochemical (Galvanic) and Electrolytic Cells, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 10, 1079-1099.
Griffiths, A.K., Preston, K. R. (1992;. Grade - 12 Students' Misconceptions Relating to Fundamental Characteristics of Atoms and Molecules, Journal of Research in
Science Teaching, 29, 6, 611-628.
Gunstone, R. F. (1990). Children's Science: A Decade of Developments in Constructivist views of Science Teaching and Learning, The Australian Science
Teachers Journal, 36 (4), 1990.
Gussarsky, E. & Gorodetsky, M. (1990). On the Concept Chemical Equilibrium: The Associative Framework, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 3, 197¬204.
Haslam, F. & Treagust, D. F. (1987). Diagnosing Secondary Students' Misconceptions of Photosynthesis and Respiration in Plants Using a Two-Tier Multiple Choice Instrument, Journal of Biological Education, 21, 3, 203-211.
Horton, P.B., Mcconney, A.A, Gallo, M., Woods, A.L., Senn, G., & Hamelin, D. (1993^. An investigation of the effectiveness of concept mapping as an instructional tool. Science Education, 77, 1, 95-111.
Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi Yıl:2003 (1) Sayı:13 66
Karataş, F.Ö. (2003). Lise 2 Kimyasal Denge Konusunun Öğretiminde Bilgisayar Paket Programları İle Klasik Yöntemlerin Etkililiğinin Karşılaştırılması, KTÜ Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Trabzon.
Liew, C.W. & Treagust, D.F. (1998). The Effectiveness of Predict-Observe-Explain Tasks in Diagnosing Students' Understanding of Science and in Identifying Their Levels of Achievement, Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of The American Educational Research Association, San Diego. Mann, M., Treagust, D. F. (1998). A Pencil and Paper Instrument to Diagnose Students' Conception of Breathing, Gas Exchange and Respiration, Australian Science Teachers Journal, 44, 2, 55-59. Martinez, M. N., Solano, I. ve Gomez, E. J. (2001/ Characteristic of the Methodology Used to Describe Student's Conceptions, International Journal of Science
Education, 23, 7, 663-690.
Mitchell, I. J. & Gunstone, G.F. (1984). Some Student Conception Brought to the Study
of Stoichiometry, Research in Science Education, 14, 78-88. Mike, M., & Treagust, D. F. (1998). A Pencil and Paper Instrument to Diagnose Students' Conceptions of Breathing, Gas Exchange and Respiration, Australian
Science Teachers Journal, 44 (2), 55-60. Mintzes, J. J., Wandersee, J. H., Novak, J. D. (2001). Assessing Understanding in
Biology, Journal of Biological Education, 35, 3, 118-125. Novak, J. D., Gowin, D. B. (1993). Learning How to Learn, Cambridge University
Press, New York, 1984. Odom, A. L., Barrow, H. L. (1995). Development and Application of a Two-Tier Diagnostic Test Measuring College Biaology Students' Understanding of Diffusion and Osmosis after aCourse of Instruction, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 1, 45-61. Osborne, R. J. & Cosgrove, M. M. (1983). Children's conceptions of the changes of
state of water, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 9, 825-838. Osborne, R. J., Freyberg, P. (1985). Learning in Science the Implications of
Children's Science, Published by Heinnemann Education. Osborne, R. J. & Gilbert, J. (1980). A Method for the Investigation of Concept Understanding in Science, European Journal of Science Education, V.2 (3):
311-321.
Osborne, R. J. & Wittrock, M. C. (1983). Learning Science: A Generative Process,
Science Education, 67, 4, 489-508.
Özçelik, D. A. (1998). Ölçme ve Değerlendirme, ÖSYM Yayınları, Yükseköğretim
Kurulu Matbaası, Ankara. Palmer, D. (2001). Students' Alternative Conceptions and Scientifically Acceptable Conceptions About Gravity, International Journal of Science Education, 23, 7,
691-706.
Palmer, D. H. (1998). Measuring Contextual Error in the Diagnosis of Alternative
Conceptions in Science, Issues in Educational Research, 8, 1, 65-76. Peterson, R. F. & Treagust, D. F. (1989). Grade-12 Students' Misconception of Covalent Bonding and Structure, Journal of Chemical Education, 66, 6, 459¬460.
Peterson,
R.F.
, Treagust, D.F., & Garnett, P.J. (1989;. Development and Application of a Diagnostic Instrument to Evaluate Grade-11 and -12 Students' Concepts of
Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi Yıl:2003 (1) Sayı:13 67
Covalent Bonding and Structure Following a course of Instruction, Journal of
Research in Science
Teaching
, 26, 4, 301-314. Schoon, J.K., Boone, J.W. (1998). Self - Efficacy and Alternative Conceptions of
Science of Preservice Elementary Teachers, Science Education, 82, 553-568. Smith, K.J. ve Metz, P.A. (1996). Evaluating Student Understanding of Solution
Chemistry through Microscopic Representations. Journal of Chemical
Education, 73, 3, 1996.
Taber, K. S. (1999). Ideas about Ionisation Energy: A Diagnostic Instrument, School
Science Review, 81, 295, 97-104. Tamir, P. (1971). An alternative Approach to the Construction of Multiple Choices Test
Items, Journal of Biological Education, 5, 223-235. Tan, K. C. D., Goh, K. N., Chia, S. L. & Treagust, D. F. (2002/ Development and
Application of a Two-Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Instrument to Assess High
School Students' Understanding of Inorganic Chemistry Qualitative Analysis,
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 4, 283-301. Treagust, D.F. (1988). "Development and Use of Diagnostic Tests to Evaluate Students'
Misconception in Science", International Journal of Science Education, 10, 2,
159-169.
Turgut, M. F. (1995).
Eğitimd
e Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Metotları, Yargıcı Matbaası, Ankara.
Tyson, L., Treagust, D. F., Bucat, R. B. (1999). The Complexity Teaching and Learning
Chemical Equilibrium, Journal of Chemical Education, 76, 4, 554-558. Voska, K. W., Heikkinen, H. W. (2000). Identification and Analysis of Student
Conception Used to Solve Chemical Equilibrium Problems, Journal of Research
in Science Teaching, 37, 2, 160-176. White, R.T. & Gunstone, R.F. (1992). Probing Understanding, The Falmer Press,
London.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com