Altun, M. (1995). İlkokul 3., 4. ve 5. SınıfÖğrencilerinin Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated
Problem Çözme Davranışları Üzerine cognition and the culture of learning.
Bir Araştırma. Doktora Tezi, Ankara, Educational Researcher, 17(1), 32-41.
Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Busbridge, J. A., & Özçelik, D.A. (1997). İlköğretimde
Enstitüsü. Matematik Öğretimi (Çev. D.A., Özçelik),
Antonietti, A. (1991). Why does mental visualization YÖK. Dünya Bankası Milli Eğitimi Geliştirme
facilitate problem-solving? In
R
. Logie & M. Projesi Hizmet Öncesi Öğretmen Eğitimi,
Denis (Eds.), Mental images in human cognition (pp. Ankara.
211-229), Holland: Elseveir Science Pub. Carpenter, T. P., Kepner, H. S., Corbitt, M. K.,
Baykul, Y. ve Sulak, S. (2006). "Problem Çözme Lindquist, M M., & Reys, R. E. (1980) Solving
Stratejilerinin İlköğretimde Problem verbal problems: Results and implications
Çözme Başarısına Etkisi", Ulusal Sınıf for National Assessment. Arithmetic
Öğretmenliği Kongresi Bildiri Kitabı, C. 1, Ankara, Teacher, 28, 8-12. Kök Yayıncılık.
Choi, J.I., & Hannafin, M. (1997). The Effects of
Instructional Context and Reasoning Complexity on Mathematics Problem-Solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(3), 43-55.
Cockcroft, W.H. (1982). Mathematics counts: Report of the committee of inquiry into the teaching of mathematics in schools. London: HMSO.
Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
Cordova, D. I., & Lepper, M. R. (1996). Intrinsic Motivation and the Process of Learning: Beneficial Effects of Contextualization, Personalization, and Choice. Journal of Education Psychology, 88(4), 715-730.
Garderen, D. V., & Montague, M. (2003). Visua-spatial representation, mathematical problem solving, and students of varying abilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18(4), 246-254.
Geary, D. C. (1994). Children's mathematical development: Research and practical applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Hembree, R. (1992). Experiments and relational studies in problem solving: a meta-analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 242-273.
Kaufmann, G. (1990). Imagery effects on problem solving. In J. Hampson (Ed.), Imagery: Current developments (pp. 169-196). London: Routledge.
Kaur, B. (1997). Difficulties with problem solving in mathematics. The Mathematical Educator, 2(1),
93-112.
Koedinger, K. R., & Nathan, M. J. (2004). The real story behind story problems: Effects of representations on quantitative reasoning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(2), 129-164.
Ku, H-Y., & Sullivan, H. J. (2002). Student
Performance and Attitudes Using Personalized Mathematics Instruction.
Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(1), 21-33.
Lopez, C. L., & Sullivan, H. J. (1992). Effect of Personalization of Instruction Context on the Achievement and Attitudes of Hispanic Students. Education Technology Research and Development, 40(4), 5-13.
Lowrie, T. (1996). The use of visual imagery as a problem-solving tool: Classroom implementation. Journal of Mental Imagery, 20,
127-140.
Lowrie, T. (1998). The importance of visual processing in non-routine and novel problem solving situations. In A. McIntosh & N. Ellerton (Eds.), Research in mathematics
education: Some current trends (pp. 186-210). Perth: MASTEC Publication. Lowrie, T., & Kay, R. (2001). Relationship between visual and nonvisual solution methods and difficulty in elementary mathematics. The Journal of Educational Research, 94(4), 248-255. Moyer, P.S. (2000). Communicating mathematically: Children's literature as a natural connection. The Reading Teacher, 54(3), 246-255. Nathan, M J., Kintsch, W., & Young, E. (1992). A theory of algebra word problem comprehension and its implications for the design of computer learning environments. Cognition and Instruction, 9(4), 329-389. Nathan, M.J., Koedinger, K.R. & Tabachneck-Schijf, H.J.M. (1997). Teachers' and Researchers' beliefs of early algebra development. In the Proceedings to the Nineteenth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp 554-559), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics, Reston, VA: Author. Overholt, J., Aaberg, N., & Lindsey, J. (1990). Maths Stories for Problems Solving Success. Ready-to-Use Activities for Grades 7-12, San Francisco, John Wiley & Sons,Inc. Pawley, D., Ayres, P., Cooper, M., & Sweller, J. (2005). Translating words into equations: A cognitive load theory approach. Educational Psychology, 25, 75-97. Pirie, S. E. B., & Kieren, T. E. (1992). Watching Sandy's understanding grow. JournalofMathematical Behavior, 11, 243-257. Polya, G. (1957). How to Solve It? (2nd ed.).
Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Polya, G. (1973). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press. Posamentier, A. S., Krulik, S. (1998). Problem-Solving Strategies for Efficient and Elegant Solutions, California, Corwin Press, Inc. Presmeg, N. C. (1986). Visualisation in high school mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 6(3), 42-46.
Presmeg, C. N., & Canas-Balderas, P. E. (2001). Visualization and affect in nonroutine problem solving. Mathematical Thinking and
Learning, 3(4), 289-313.
Rieber, L. P. (1995). A historical review of visualization in human cognition. Educational Technology Research & Development, 43(1), 45-56. Riley, M. S , & Greeno, J. G. (1988). Developmental analysis of understanding language about quantities and of solving problems. Cognition and Instruction, 5(1), 49-101. Ross, S. M. Mccormick, D., & Krisak, N. (1986). Adapting the Thematic Context of
98
• ••III
Pamukkale University Journal of Education, Number 30 (July 2011/11)
The Influence of Visual Representations and Context on Mathematical Word Problem Solving
Mathematical Problems to Student Tabachneck, H. J. M , Koedinger, K. R., & Nathan,
Interests: Individualized Versus Group- M. J. (1994). Toward a theoretical account
Based Strategies. Journal of Educational Research, of strategy use and sense making in
79(4), 245-252. mathematics problem solving. In Proceedings
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. of the Sixteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science
Orlando, FL: Academic Press. Society (pp. 836-841). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence
Silver, E. A. (1987). Foundations of cognitive theory Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
and research for mathematics problem- Tertemiz, N. (1994). İlkokullarda Aritmetik
solving instruction. In A. H. Schoenfeld Problemlerini Çözmede Etkili Görülen Bazı
(Ed.), Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education. Faktörler, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi,
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Ankara, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Sosyal
Sweller, J., & Low, R. (1992). Some cognitive factors Bilimler Enstitüsü.
relevant to mathematics instruction. Wiest, L. R. (2002). Aspects of word-problem
Mathematics Education Research Journal, 4, 83-94. context that influence children's problem-
Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. solving performance. FOCUS on Learning Problems
W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and in Mathematics, 24(2), 38-52.
Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com