Buradasınız

BiYOGAZ URETiMiNDE BASINCIN ETKiSi

EFFECT OF PRESSURE ON BIOGAS PRODUCTION

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
In facilities in which biogas systems are installed biogas is not produced and consumed simultaneously. Therefore, biogas produced when there is no consumption should be stored. Low pressure gasometers with 1- 1,5 kPa value are preferred in the rural area and when needed pressurizer is added to the system. When the pressure which gas production and usage require is provided by natural ways without usage of an added pressurizer, a respectively high pressure atmosphere can be seen. In this study, the effects of different low pressures on anaerobic fermentation of cattle manure were experimentally analyzed. Fermentation experiment which was carried out with 9 reactors with fed-batch type, 3 parallels in pressures of 19.6 kPa, 9.5 kPa and 1.5 kPa continued 60 days at 35 °C. The acquired experimental data was subjected to LSD test in P<0.05 significance level and it was observed that there is no significant difference between rectors operated with different pressures in terms of methane production.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Biyogaz sistemlerinin kurulu oldugu tesislerde, biyogazin uretimi ve tuketimi e§ zamanli gergekle§memektedir. Bu yuzden tuketimin olmadigi zamanlarda uretilen biyogazin depolanmasi gerekmektedir. Kirsal kesime yonelik uygulamalarda genellikle 1-1,5 kPa degerlerine sahip, du§uk basingli gazometreler tercih edilmekte, gerektiginde sisteme basinglandirici ilave edilmektedir. Gaz iletiminin ve kullaniminin gerektirdigi basing, ek bir basinglandirici kullanilmadan biyogaz uretimi sonucunda dogal yollarla saglandiginda, reaktor igerisinde nispeten yuksek bir basing ortami sozkonusu olmaktadir. Bu gali§mada, farkli du§uk basinglarin, sigir atiginin anaerobik fermentasyonu uzerine etkileri deneysel olarak incelenmi§tir. 19,6 kPa, 9,5 kPa ve 1,5 kPa basinglarda, 1 lt hacimli kesikli beslemeli tip, ug paralelli, dokuz adet reaktorle yurutulen fermentasyon denemesi, 35 °C'de 60 gun devam etmi§tir. Elde edilen deneysel veriler P<0,05 anlamlilik duzeyinde LSD testine tabi tutulmu§, metan uretim miktari bakimindan, farkli basinglarda gali§tirilan reaktorler arasinda anlamli bir farklilik olmadigi gozlenmi§tir.
181
186

REFERENCES

References: 

Alvarez, R., Villca, S., Lide'n, G. 2006. Biogas production from llama and cow manure at high altitude generation and for farm machine fuel, Biomass andBioenergy. (30), 66-75.
Anonymous, 1999. Biogas Digest Volume II- Biogas -Application and Product Development, Information and Advisory Service on Appropriate Technology.
Anonymous, 2000a. Anaerobic Digestion of Farm and Food Processing Residues, British Biogen,
www.mrec.org/biogas/adgpg.pdf
Anonymous, 2000b. AT Information: Biogas, http://www5.gtz.de/gate/ techin fo/biogas/AT_biogas.html.
Arnott, M. 1985. The Biogas/Biofertilizer Business Handbook, Peace Corps, Information Collection and Exchange, Reprint R-48.
Bayhan, M., Zablocki, M. 1991. Biogas as fuel in agricultural engines, 13. Ulusal Tarimsal Mekanizasyon Kongresi, Konya.
Camargo, E.B. 1986. Biogas clean-up and utilization, Wat. Sci.Techn. (18), 143-150.
Chynoweth, D.P. and Isaacson, R. 1987. Anaerobic digestion of biomass, springer; 1 edition, 282 p.
Datong, Z. 1989. An analysis of domestic biogas storage installations in China, Biomass. (20), 61-67.
Erya§ar, A. ve Kogar, G. 2006. Biyogaz depolama sistemleri ve farkli du§uk basinglarin biyogaz uretimi uzerine etkileri, III. Ege Enerji Sempozyumu ve Sergisi, 24-25-26 Mayis 2006, Mugla.
Gustavsson, M. 2000. Biogas technology-solution in search of its problem - a study of small-scale rural technology introduction and integration", Goteborg University, Goteborg.
Jenangi, L. 1981. Producing methane gas from effluent, Adelaide University Diploma in Agricultural Production, www.ees.adelaide. edu.au/pharris/biogas/project.pdf.
Krich, K., Augenstein, D., Batmale, J.P., Benemann, J., Rutledge, B., Salour, D. 2005. Biomethane from Dairy Waste: A Sourcebook for the Production and Use of Renewable Natural Gas in California, http://www.calstart.org/info/publications/ Biomethane from Dairy Waste Full Report.pdf
Marchaim, U. 1992. Biogas processes for sustainable development, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, ISBN: 92-5-103126-6.
Monnet, F. 2003. An introduction to anaerobic digestion of organic wastes, http://www.remade.org.uk/documents/reports/An%20Introducti on%20to%20Anaerobic%20Digestion%20 27153953177.pdf.
Nijaguna, B.T. 2002. Biogas Technology, New Age International Publishers. New Delhi. p. 289.
Sasse, L. 1988. Biogas plants, a publication of the Deutsches zentrum fur entwicklungstechnologien, GATE, A division of the deutsche gesellschaft fur technische zusammenarbeit (GTZ)
GmbH.
Tiwari, G.N., Usmani, J.A., Chandra, A. 1996. Determination of period for biogas production, Energy Convers. Mgmt, Vol.
37 (2), 199-203.
Vavilin, V.A., Vasiliev, V.B., Rytov, S.V. 1995. Modelling of gas pressure effects on anaerobic digestion, Bioresource Technology.
(52), 25-32.
Vijayalekshmy, M.V. 1985. Biogas technology-an information
package, Tata Energy Research Institute, Bombay
Walsh, J.L., Ross, C.C., Smith, M.S., Harper, S.R. 1989,
Utilization of biogas, Biomass. (20), 277-290.
Wase, D.A.J., Forster, C.F. 1984. Biogas-fact or fantasy,
Biomass. (4), 127-142.
Werner, U., Stohr, U., Hees, N. 1989. Biogas plants in animal husbandry, A Publication of the Deutsches Zentrum fur Entwicklungstechnologien, GATE, A Division of the Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com