Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

YÖNETEN-YÖNETİLEN İLİŞKİSİNDE SANSÜR

CENSORSHIP IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE RULERS AND THE RULED

Journal Name:

  • Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2009

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The concept of censorship is categorized in the same group as the terms of ban, oppression and dictatorship in virtually every society. It is also the cause of a centuries-old quarrel between those who hate the probability of any damage to the traditional structure and institutions in the running of the state and society and who, therefore, strongly object to the idea of change and those who argue that it is necessary to embrace almost everything new for the development and improvement of the society. The former group finds the practice of censorship vital for the benefits of the human and society, while the latter considers it to be wrong for the benefits of the same community. To the former group, such a practice serves as a shield but the latter sees it as a gun aimed at men.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Özet Sansür kavramı hemen her toplumda baskı, yasak ve diktatörlük gibi kavramlarla bir arada anılmaktadır. Sansür aynı zamanda devletin ve toplumun işleyişinde geleneksel yapıya ve kurumlara zarar gelmesini istemeyen ve bu nedenle değişim fikrine karşı çıkanlarla, toplumun gelişimi için yeni olan hemen her şeye kucak açılması gerektiğim savunanlar arasında yüzyıllardır var olan bir tartışmanın da sebebidir. İlk grubun temsilcileri insanların ve toplumun çıkarları için sansür uygulamasını gerekli görürken, ikinci grup aynı topluluğun çıkarları için bu uygulamayı yanlış bulmaktadır. İlk gruba göre bu uygulama bir kalkan, ikinci gruba göre İse İnsanlara yöneltilmiş bir silahtır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-yoneten-yonetilen-iliskisinde-sansur.pdf
  • 1
72-87
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Anaya, R. A.
(1993)
. "Take the Tortillas out of Your Poetry", Censored Books: Critical Viewpoints, (Ed: Nicholas J. Kalorides & Lee Burress), The Scarecrow Press, Inc., London, ss. 25-31.
ISSN: 1308-2922
85
Pnmukkali- Urn»tfSltC$l Scsy.il Bilmil'.r Enstiiusii
TEMMUZ
200
9 SAY! 4
Beehler, S. (1992). "Censorship and the Teaching of Shakespeare",
Ideological Approaches to Shakespeare: The Practice of
Theory, (Ed: Robert P. Merrix & Nicholas Ranson), The
Edwin Mellen Press, New York, ss. 215-228. Çelik, Y. (2005). Toplumsal ve Tarihsel Boyutlarıyla ingiliz
Tiyatrosunda Sansür, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Atatürk
Üniversitesi, Erzurum. Dsouza, F. (Ed.) (1991). Information Freedom and Censorship:
World Report 1991, For Article 19 Organization, The
American Library Association, Chicago. Findlater, R. (1967). Banned! A Review of Theatrical Censorship
in Britain, MacGibbon & Kee, London. Goldstein, R. J. (2000). The War for the Public Mind: Political
Censorship in Nineteenth-Century Europe, Greenwood
Publishing Group, Westport. Hall, P. (2002). "Sleaze nation", The Guardian, Wednesday, 2
October, s. 8.
Heinemann, M. (1980). Puritanism and Theatre: Thomas
Middleton and Opposition Drama under the Early
Stuarts, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Holland, D. T. (1987). The Encyclopedia Americana-Volume: VI,
Americana Corp., Danbury. Hynes, S. (1968). The Edwardian Turn of Mind, Pimligo, London. Jenkins, J. (1991). "The Public Interest", Banned, (Ed: Nicholas J.
Kalorides & Lee Burress), Channel 4 TV, London, ss. 3-10. Merrix, R. P. (1992). "Shaping the Text: The Politics of Censorship",
Ideological Approaches to Shakespeare; The Practice of
Theory, (Ed: Robert P. Merrix & Nicholas Ranson), The
Edwin Mellen Press, New York, ss. 199-213. Miller, A. (1993). "On Censorship", Censored Books: Critical
Viewpoints, (Ed: Nicholas J. Kalorides & Lee Burress), The
Scarecrow Press, Inc., London, ss. 3-7. Nicholson, S. (1999). British Theatre and the Red Peril: The
Portrayal of Communism, 1917-1945, University of Exeter
Press, Exeter.
O'Flaherty, L. (1990). "The Irish Censorship", (Ed: Julia Carlson),
Banned in Ireland: Censorship and the Irish Writer,
Routledge, London, aaç 139-141. Post, R. C. (1998). "Project Report: Censorship and Silencing",
Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences,
Vol. 51, No. 5, May-June, ss. 32-35.
86
ISSN: 130S-2922
Pamukkale University Journal of Social Institute
TEMMUZ 2009 SAYI 4
Reinelt, J. (2006). "The Limits of Censorship", Theatre Research
International, Vol. 32, No. 1, ss. 3-15. Rice, E. (1959). The Living Theatre, Harper & Brothers, New York. Robertson, G. (1979). Obscenity: An Account of Censorship Laws
and Their Enforcement in England and Wales, Weidenfeld
& Nicolson, London. Steinberg, S. H. (1953). Cassel's Encyclopedia of Literature-Volume: I, Cassel & Com. Ltd., London. Williams, J. A. (1993). "Blackballing", Censored Books: Critical
Viewpoints, (Ed: Nicholas J. Kalorides & Lee Burress), The
Scarecrow Press, Inc., London, ss. 11-18. Galles, G. (2006). Freedom the Press and Liberty. Mises Economics
Blog, Ludwig von Mises Institute, Alabama,
http://blog.mises.org/archives/005084.asp - 08.01.2009. QuotationsVault.com - Great Quotes. (2005).
http://www.quotationvault.com/author/_Voltaire - 16.01.2009. "Censorship," Microsoft Encarta Online Encyclopedia. (2008).
http://encarta.msn.com - 11.01.2009.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com