Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Eğitim Fakültesi Öğrencilerinin Öğrenme Yaklasımları Tercihleri ve Öğrenmeye İliskin Algılarının İncelenmesi

Analysis of Approaches to Learning Preferences and Perceptions of Learning of Students in Faculty of Education

Journal Name:

  • Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2013

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Purpose of this study is to determine preference levels of approaches to learning and whether there is a significant difference as regards department, gender and class rank of preference levels of students in faculty of education. The research is a survey model. Universe of this research is comprised of students studying in Kazım Karabekir Education Faculty of Atatürk University in fall term 2011-2012 education year. Sample of the research is comprised of 393 candidate teachers that were selected randomly. Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students – ASSĐST has been employed to obtain research data. According to research results each of three approaches to learning is preferred with a percentage of over fifty nine out of a hundred. No significant difference was found between approach to learning preferences of candidate teachers in faculty of education according to field of the study, gender and class rank variables. Students stated to the term "learning" as to " Being able to use the information you’ve acquired".
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalısmanın amacı, eğitim fakültesi öğrencilerinin öğrenme yaklasımlarını tercih etme düzeylerini ve tercih düzeylerinin bölüm, cinsiyet ve sınıf düzeyi değiskenleri açısından anlamlı farklılık gösterip göstermediğini belirlemektir. Arastırma tarama modelinde bir çalısmadır. Arastırmanın evreni, 2011-2012 eğitim-öğretim yılı, bahar yarıyılında, Atatürk Üniversitesi, Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi`nde öğrenim gören öğrencilerden olusmaktadır. Arastırmanın örneklemi ise evren içerisinden basit seçkisiz örnekleme yöntemiyle seçilen 393 kisiden olusmaktadır. Verilerin elde edilmesinde Öğrenme Yaklasımları ve Çalısma Becerileri Ölçeği kullanılmıstır. Arastırmanın sonuçlarına göre üç öğrenme yaklasımı da yüz üzerinden elli dokuz ortalamanın üstünde tercih edilmektedir. Eğitim fakültesi öğrencilerinin öğrenme yaklasımları tercihleri arasında öğrenim görülen alan, cinsiyet ve sınıf düzeyi değiskenlerine göre anlamlı farklılık yoktur. Öğrenciler “öğrenme” terimini daha çok “Kazandığınız bilgileri kullanabilmek” olarak ifade etmektedirler.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-egitim-fakultesi-ogrencilerinin-ogrenme-yaklasimlari-tercihleri-ogrenmeye-iliskin-algilarinin-incelenmesi.pdf
  • 1
55
66
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Akbulut, Y. (2010). Sosyal bilimlerde SPSS uygulamaları. İstanbul: Kültür Yayıncılık.
Berberoglu, G.,
&
Hei, L. M.
(2003)
. A comparison of university students' approaches to learning across Taiwan and Turkey. International Journal of Testing, 3(2), 173-187.
Beşoluk, Ş.,
&
Önder, İ.
(2010)
. Investigation of teacher candidates' learning approaches, learning styles and critical thinking dispositions. İlköğretim Online, 9(2), 679-693.
Betoret, F. D., & Artiga, A. G. (2011). The relationship among basic student need satisfaction, approaches to learning, reporting of avoidance strategies and achievement. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 9, 463-496.
Biggs, J. B. (1985). The role of metalearning in study processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 185-212.
Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Biggs, J. B. (Ed.) (1991). Teaching for learning: The view from cognitive psychology. Hawthorn, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Biggs, J. B. (1993). What do inventories of students' learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 3-19.
Biggs, J. B., Kember D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2001). The revised two factor study process questionnaire. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(1), 133-149.
Brown, G. T. L., Lake, R., & Matters, G. (2008). New Zealand and Queensland teachers' conceptions of learning: Transforming more than reproducing. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 8, 1-14.
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (11. baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
Byrne, M., Flood, B., & Willis, P. (2009). An inter-institutional exploration of the learning approaches of students studying accounting. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(2),
155-167.
Chang, Z., Martin, V., & Tammy, S. (2008). A cross-cultural study of Chinese and Flemish university students: Do they differ in learning conceptions and approaches to learning? Learning and Individual Differences, 18,
120-127.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
Çolak, E., & Fer, S. (2007). Öğrenme yaklaşımları envanterinin dilsel eşdeğerlik, güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışması. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 16(1), 197-212.
Ekinci, N., & Ekinci, E. (2007). Hacettepe Üniversitesi İlköğretim Bölümü öğrencilerinin öğrenme yaklaşımları. I. Ulusal İlköğretim Kongresi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.
Ekinci, N. (2009). Üniversite öğrencilerinin öğrenme yaklaşımları. Eğitim ve Bilim, 34(151), 74-88.
Ellez, A. M., & Sezgin, G. (2002). Öğretmen adaylarının öğrenme yaklaşımları. V. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi, ODTÜ Kültür ve Kongre Merkezi, Ankara.
Gadelrab, H. F. (2011). Factorial structure and predictive validity of approaches and study skills inventory for students (assist) in Egypt: A confirmatory factor analysis approach. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 9(3), 1197-1218.
Gijbels, D., Segers, M.,
&
Struyf, E.
(2008)
. Constructivist learning environments and the (im)possibility to change students' perceptions of assessment demands and approaches to learning. Instructional Science,
36(5-6), 431-443.
Harlen, W., & James, M., (1997). Assessment and learning: differences and relationships between formative and summative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. 4(3). 365-380.
Pegem
Eğiti
m ve Öğretim Dergisi / 2013 Cilt: 3, Sayı: 1
Eğitim Fakültesi Öğrencilerinin Öğrenme Yaklaşımları Tercihleri ve Öğrenmeye İlişkin Algılarının İncelenmesi 65
Harper, G., & Kember, D. (1986). Approaches to study of distance education students, British Journal of Educational Technology, 17, 212-222.
Karasar, N. (2009).
Bilimsel
araştırma yöntemi (20. Baskı). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
Kember, D.,
Leung
, D. Y. P., & McNaught, C. (2008). A workshop activity to demonstrate that approaches to learning are influenced by the teaching and learning environment. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9,
43-56.
Kızılgüneş,
B.
, Tekkaya, C., & Sungur, S. (2009). Modeling the relations among students' epistemological beliefs, motivation, learning approach, and achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(4),
243-256.
Leung, D. Y. P., Ginns, P., & Kember, D. (2008). Examining the cultural specificity of approaches to learning in universities in Hong Kong and Sydney. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 39, 251-266.
Lietz, P., & Matthews, M. (2010). The effects of college students' personal values on changes in learning approaches. Research in Higher Education, 51(1), 65-87.
Magno, C. (2009). Investigating the effect of school ability on self-efficacy, learning approaches, and metacognition. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 18(2), 233-244.
Marton, F. (1975) On non-verbatim learning: 1. Level of processing and level of outcome. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 16, 273-279.
Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I - Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4-11.
McLean, M. (2001). Can we relate conceptions of learning to student academic achievement?. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(3), 399-413.
Ozan, C., Gündoğdu, K., & Köse, E. (2012, Mayıs). Okul öncesi ve sınıf öğretmenliği öğrencilerinin öğrenme yaklaşımlarının incelenmesi. 11. Ulusal Sınıf Öğretmenliği Sempozyumu, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi, Rize.
Ramburuth, P., & Mladenovic, R. (2004). Exploring the relationship between students' orientations to learning, the structure of students' learning outcomes and subsequent academic performance. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 13(4), 507-527.
Ramsden, P. (1979). Student learning and perceptions of the academic environment. Higher Education, 8, 411¬427.
Ramsden, P. (2000). Learning to teaching in higher education. London: Newyork Routhladge Falmer.
Richardson, J. T. E. (1995). Mature students in higher education: II. An investigation of approaches to studying and academic performance. Studies in Higher Education, 20(1), 5-17.
Sadler-Smith, E. (1997). 'Learning Style': Frameworks and instruments. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 17, (1-2), 51-63.
Senemoğlu,
N
. (2011). College of education students' approaches to learning and study skills. Education and Science, 36(160), 65-80.
Sezgin-Selçuk, G., Çalışkan, S., & Erol, M. (2007). Fizik öğretmen adaylarının öğrenme yaklaşımlarının değerlendirilmesi. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 27(2), 25-41.
Smith, S. N., & Miller, R. J. (2005) Learning approaches: examination type, discipline of study, and gender. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 25(1), 43-53.
Tait, H., Entwistle, N. J., & McCune, V. (1998). ASSIST: A re-conceptualisation of the approaches to studying inventory. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving students as learners (pp. 262-271). Oxford: Oxford Brookes University, Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
Tight, M. (2003). Researching higher education. Maidenhead, Berkshire, United Kingdom: McGraw Hill.
Topkaya, N.,
Yaka
, B., & Öğretmen, T. (2011). Öğrenme ve ders çalışma yaklaşımları envanterinin uyarlanması ve ilgili yapılarla ilişkisinin belirlenmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 36(159), 192-204.
Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi / 2013 Cilt: 3, Sayı: 1
66
Ceyhu
n OZAN & Muhammed ÇİFTÇİ
Watkins, D. (1982). Identifying the study process dimensions of Australian university students. Australian Journal of Education, 26, 76-85.
Watkins, D. (1983). Assessing tertiary study processes. Human Learning, 2, 29-37.
Watkins, D., & Hattie, J. (1981). The learning processes of Australian university students: Investigations of contextual and personological factors. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 384-393.
Yılmaz, M.
B.
, & Orhan, F. (2010). Pre-service English teachers in blended learning environment in respect to their learning approaches. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(1), 157-164
Pegem Eğitim

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com