Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Uzaktan Eğitimin Önündeki Engeller ve Bunlar İçin Çözümler: Türk Polis Teşkilatı Örneği

Barriers To Distance Learning And Solutions: The Case Of Turkish Natıonal Police

Journal Name:

  • Polis Bilimleri Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2010

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
New developments in technology, particularly the information technology, have changed the perception of learning. These changes have made distance learning (DL) an important part of education. DL has become an alternative to traditional face-to-face learning. DL provides flexibility for students; thus, they can obtain desired education without being dependent to time and locations. In addition to schools and universities, public and private originations widely use DL. Similarly, the Turkish National Police (TNP) trains its members via DL. Since 2006, the TNP annually trains 5.000 members using DL applications. Although DL provides many opportunities for organizations, when it is compared with the traditional classroom learning, different environment of DL contains some barriers including environment of DL, self-direction, design, instructor, communication, feedback, experience, and technology. These barriers can influence performance, success, and satisfaction of students. The TNP has invested a great amount of resources in DL. To make these investments worthy, the TNP should deal with these barriers. To eliminate the barriers to DL and to improve DL effectiveness, solutions are available. This article analyzes DL and its barriers to take attention of the TNP. In addition, this article provides some solutions to eliminate the barriers and to obtain more effective and efficient learning from DL.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Teknolojideki, özellikle bilgi teknolojilerindeki gelişmeler eğitime bakış açılarını değiştirdi. Bu değişimler, uzaktan eğitim uygulamalarını eğitim faaliyetlerinin önemli bir parçası haline getirdi. Uzaktan eğitimin öğrencilere sağladığı esneklik ile artık öğrenciler arzu ettikleri eğitimleri zaman ve mekana bağlı kalmadan elde edebilmektedirler. Okullar ve üniversitelerle beraber özel ve kamu kuruluşları da yaygın olarak uzaktan eğitimi kullanmaktadırlar. Benzer olarak, Türk Polis Teşkilatı da mensuplarını uzaktan eğitim kullanarak eğitmektedir. Türk Polis Teşkilatı 2006 yılından bu yana yıllık olarak yaklaşık 5.000 personeline uzaktan eğitim uygulamalarını kullanarak eğitim vermektedir. Uzaktan eğitim, organizasyonlar için bir çok fırsatlar sunmasına rağmen geleneksel eğitim ile karşılaştırıldığında uzaktan eğitimin dizayn, eğitimci, iç disiplin, geri bildirim, tecrübe, teknoloji ve farklı çevre koşulları kaynaklı engelleri vardır. Bu engeller öğrencilerin başarı, performans ve memnuniyetlerini etkilemektedir. Türk Polis Teşkilatı önemli derecede kaynaklarını uzaktan eğitim için harcamaktadır. Bu kaynakların kazanca dönüştürülmesi için Türk Polis Teşkilatının uzaktan eğitimin bu engellerini elimine etmesi gerekmektedir. Bu engelleri elimine etmek ve uzaktan eğitimin etkilerini artırmak için çözümler vardır. Bu makale, Türk Polis Teşkilatının dikkatini çekmek amacı ile uzaktan eğitimi ve uzaktan eğitime engel unsurları analiz etmektedir. Ayrıca, bu makale uzaktan eğitimin engellerini elimine edecek ve uzaktan eğitimin etkinliğini artıracak çözümler de sunmaktadır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-uzaktan-egitimin-onundeki-engeller-bunlar-icin-cozumler-turk-polis-teskilati-ornegi.pdf
  • 4
19-36
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Bates, Tony, (1991), “Third generation distance education: The challenge
of new technology”, Research in Distance Education, 3, pp.10-15.
Berge, L. Zane and Muilenberg, Y. Lin, (2005), “Student Barriers to
Online Learning: A factor analytic study”, Distance Education, 26,
pp. 29-48.
Bernard, Robert; Abrami, C. Philip; Lou, Yiping; Borokhovski, Eugene;
Wade, A.; Wozney, L.; Wallet, P. A. and Fiset, M., (2004), “How
Does Distance Education Compare With Classroom Instruction? A
Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literatures”, Review of Educational
Research, 74 (3), pp.379-439.
Can, Ertuğ, (2004), “Uzaktan Eğitim Öğrencilerinin Eğitimlerini Değerlendirmeleri”,
XIII. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kurultayı.
Candy, Philip, (1991), Self-Direction for Lifelong Learning, San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
Comeaux, Patricia, (1995), “The Impact of an Interactive Distance Learning
Network on Classroom Communication”, Communication Education,
44, pp.353-361.
Coppola, W. Nancy; Hiltz, Roxanne S. and. Rotter, Naomi, (2001),
Building trust in virtual teams, Proceedings of IEEE International
Professional Communication Conference, IPCC 2001. Piscataway,
NJ., pp.353-366.
Dennen, Vanessa P., (2005), “From Message Posting to Learning Dialogues:
Factors Affecting Learner Participation in Asynchronous
Discussion”, Distance Education, 26, pp.127-148.
Galusha, Jill, (1998), Barriers to learning in distance education, Hattiesburg,
MS: The University of Southern Mississippi (ERIC Document
Reproduction No. ED 416, 377).
Barriers to Distance Learning and Solutions: The Case of Turkish
National Police
35
Garrison, Randy D., (1997), “Self-Directed Learning: Toward A Comprehensive
Model”, Adult Education Quarterly, 48, pp.18-33.
Henderson, Allan J., (2003), The e-learning question and answer book: A
survival guide for trainers and business managers, New York:
AMACOM Books.
Hillesheim, Gwen, (1998), “Barriers and Strategies for Students and Faculty”,
Internet and Higher Education, 1, pp.31-44.
Hiltz, Starr R. and Turoff, Murray, (2005), “Education Goes Digital: The
Evolution of Online Learning and The Revolution In Higher Education”,
Communications of the ACM, 48, pp.59-64.
Howland, Jane L. and Moore, Joi L., (2002), “Student Perceptions as
Distance Learners in Internet-Based Courses”, Distance Education,
23, pp.183-195.
Huang, Hsiu-Mei and Liaw, Shu-Sheng, (2004), “Guiding Distance Educators
in Building Web-Based Instructions”, International Journal of
Instructional Media, 31, pp.125-138.
Levin, James; Kim, Haesun; and Riel, Margaret, (1990), “Analyzing instructional
interactions on electronic messaging Networks”, in L.
Harasim (Ed.), Online education: Perspectives on a new environment
New York: Praeger.(pp.185-213).
Mayzer, Roni and Dejong, Christina, (2003), “Student satisfaction with
distance education in a criminal justice graduate course”, Journal of
Criminal Justice Education, 14, pp.37-52.
Moore, Michael G., (1991), “Editorial: Distance education theory”, The
American Journal of Distance Education, 5, pp.1-6.
National Center for Education Statistics, (2002), Distance Education at
Degree-granting Post Secondary Education Institutions: 2000-2001,
U.S. Department of Education, Office.
Peterson, Cynthia L. and Bond, Nathan, (2004), “Online Compared to
Face-to-Face Teacher Preparation for Learning Standards-Based
Planning Skills”, Journal of Research on Technology in Education,
36, pp.345- 360.
36 Polis Bilimleri Dergisi: 12 (4)
Russell, Thomas L., (1999), (The no significant difference phenomenon
as reported in 355 research reports, summaries and papers: a comparative
research annotated bibliography on technology for distance
education,) Raleigh, NC: Office of instructional Telecommunications,
North Carolina State University.
Stine, Linda, (2004), “The Best of Both Worlds: Teaching Basic Writers
in Class and Online”, Journal of Basic Writing, 23, pp.49-69.
Swan, Karen, (2001), “Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student
satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online
courses”, Distance Education, 22, pp.306-331.
Tham, Chee M. and Werner, Jon M., (2005), “Designing and Evaluating
E-Learning in Higher Education: A Review and Recommendations”,
Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 11, pp.15-25.
Thomerson, Jim D. and Smith, Clifton L., (1996), “Student Perceptions
of the Affective Experiences Encountered in Distance Learning
Courses”, The American Journal of Distance Education, 10, pp.37-
48.
Van Dam, Nick, (2004), The e-learning fieldbook, New York: McGraw-
Hill Co.
Waggoner, Kim and Christenberry, Tom, (1997), “Virtual learning: Distance
education for law enforcement”, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin,
66, pp.1-8.
Zengin, Selçuk, (2007), E-learning and in-service training: an exploration
of the beliefs and practices of trainers and trainees in the Turkish
national police, Retrieved November 18, 2008, from
http://digital.library.unt.edu/permalink/meta-dc-3895:1.
Zirkle, Chris, (2001), “Access Barriers in Distance Education”, Contemporary
Education, 72, pp.39-42.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com