Buradasınız

AN IMPACT OF CO-SCHOLASTIC DOMAIN ON SCHOLASTIC DOMAINS AMONG SENIOR SECONDARY STUDENTS

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (Original Language): 
Central Board Of Secondary Education (CBSE) had been emphasizing education of students at secondary level, that is, grades IX and X, by developing their ten core Life Skills called self-awareness; empathy; critical thinking; creative thinking; decision making; problem solving; ef ective communication; interpersonal relationship; coping with stress and coping with emotion along with linking it to its scheme of comprehensive and continuous evaluation (CCE) in the formative evaluation format. The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of instruction of academic and life skills on the Senior Secondary students. The research procedure was semi-experimental with pre-test and post-test design with a control group. The statistical sample included 50 students of standard XI were randomly selected and assigned in experimental and control groups. The instruments were Life skills inventory, average grade first term, and demographic questions. The experimental group attended in 16 weekly sessions (35 hours) of academic and life skills training. The results showed that the students who had received academic and life skills training gained significantly higher scores in life skills and academic achievement than those with no training. Also, not significant different between male and female students in the score of life skills and academic achievement observed. It seems that assessing and meeting student's life skills and academic achievement needs, especially in the first year of their study is very essential.
1
6

REFERENCES

References: 

Misera, R., & Castillo, G. L. 2004. Academic stress, anxiety and management among college students.
International journal of stress management.11 (2), 132-148.
Carter, C., Bishop, J., & Kravits, S. L. 2006. Keys to success: Building successful intelligence for college,
career and life (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson-Prentice Hall.
Crismore, A. 1984. Academic skills improvement in higher education: Challenges, issues, and possible
approaches. ERIC Viewpoints, 120, 1-6.
Golshani, F., & Hasani, F. 2002. Estimation and analysis of students doing poorly in studies and the
contributing factors. A seminar on introduction to results of specialist workforce assessment project.
Hammer, B. 2003. Award-winning approaches to retention. Black Issues in Higher Education. Retrieved
December 28, 2004 from http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_mODXK/is_11_20/ai_106225428.
Maxwell, M. 1985. Improving student learning skills (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Soomyung, J., & Namhee, K. (2004). Transition from high school to higher education and work in Korea.
International journal of Educational Development, 24 (6), 691-703
Zhao, C. H., & Kuh, G. D. 2004. Adding value: Learning communities and student engagement. Research
in Higher Education, 45, 115-138

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com