Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

SKLERAL FİKSASYONLU GÖZ İÇİ LENSİ İMPLANTASYONU SONUÇLARIMIZ

RESULTS OF SCLERAL SUTURED INTRAOCULAR LENS IMPLANTATION

Journal Name:

  • Selçuk Tıp Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2009

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Aim: To evaluate the results of posterior chamber intraocular lenses implanted by scleral fixation technique. Method: 34 eyes of 34 cases which had intraocular lens implantation by scleral fixation method between January 2002 to December 2006 were retrospectively evaluated. The parameters evaluated were the age and sex distribution, primary or secondary IOL implantation, type of implanted intra ocular lens, visual acuity, intra ocular pressure and complications. Results: The mean age of the patients was 52.55± 22.08 years (range 4 to 83 years). The mean follow up time was 6.41±6.49 (3–36) months. The mean postoperative best corrected visual acuities (BCVA) in PMMA IOL group and foldable IOL group were, 0.39±0.35 and 0.57±0.27, respectively (p=0.146). The mean postoperative best corrected visual acuities (BCVA) in primary implantation group and secondary implantation group were, 0.44±0.34 and 0.47±0.32, respectively (p=0.758). The postoperative complication rates in PMMA IOL group and foldable IOL group were 40.9% and 16.6%, respectively. Postoperative IOP increase and cystoid macular edema were the main complications. Implanted twenty-two IOLs were PMMA, and twelve were 3-piece hydrophobic acrylic. Conclusion: Implantation with scleral fixation of IOLs may be preferred in eyes with absence of zonular and capsular support. Although visual outcomes were similar for the two IOL types, scleral fixation of foldable IOLs take less time, have low incidence of complications and earlier visual rehabilitation. Long term studies with larger number of patients may better define the role of scleral sutured posterior chamber intraocular foldable lens implantation.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Amaç: Skleral fiksasyon tekniği ile arka kamaraya göz içi lensi implantasyonu sonuçlarının değerlendirilmesi. Yöntem: Ocak 2002 ile Aralık 2006 tarihleri arasında skleral fiksasyon tekniği ile göziçi lensi implante edilen 34 olgunun 34 gözüne ait kayıtlar retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Olgular, yaş, cinsiyet, primer veya sekonder GİL implantasyonu, implante edilen GİL cinsi, görme keskinliği, göziçi basıncı ve komplikasyonlar yönünden incelendi. Bulgular: Olguların yaş ortalaması 52.55±22.08 yıl (4-83) idi. Ortalama takip süresi 6.41±6.49 (3–36) aydı. Postoperatif en iyi düzeltilmiş görme keskinliği PMMA GİL grubunda 0.39±0.35, katlanabilir GİL grubunda 0.57±0.27 olarak saptandı (p=0.146). Primer GİL implante edilen grupta postoperatif en iyi düzeltilmiş görme keskinliği 0.44±0.34 iken, sekonder GİL implante edilen grupta ise 0.47±0.32 olarak saptandı (p=0.758). Postoperatif komplikasyon oranı PMMA GİL grubunda %40.9, katlanabilir GİL grubunda %16.6 olarak saptandı.Postoperatif göziçi basıncı yükselmesi ve kistoid maküler ödem başlıca komplikasyonları oluşturmaktaydı. İmplante edilen 22 GİL PMMA,12 GİL ise 3 parçalı hidrofobik akrilik idi. Sonuç: Kapsül ve zonül desteğin yeterli olmadığı gözlerde skleral fiksasyon ile GİL implantasyonu tercih edilebilir bir yöntemdir. Her iki GİL tipi ile görsel sonuçlar benzer olsa da, katlanabilir GİL ile skleral fiksasyon tekniği daha az zaman almakta, daha düşük komplikasyon oranı saptanmakta ve erken görsel rehabilitasyona imkan sağlanmaktadır. Katlanabilir GİL ile skleral fiksasyon tekniğinin etkinliği ve güvenilirliği için daha fazla sayıda olgu ile uzun süre izlemli çalışmalar yapılması yararlı olacaktır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-skleral-fiksasyonlu-goz-ici-lensi-implantasyonu-sonuclarimiz.pdf
  • 3
144-149

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Epley KD, Shainberg MJ, Lueder GT,
Tychsen L. Pediatric secondary lens
implantation in the absence of capsular
support. J AAPOS. 2001; 5: 301-6.
2. Dick HB, Augustin AJ. Lens implant
selection with absence of capsular
support.Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2001 ; 12:
47-57.
3. Evereklioglu C, Er H, Bekir NA, Borazan
M, Zorlu F. Comparison of secondary
implantation of flexible open-loop anterior
chamber and scleral-fixated posterior
chamber intraocular lenses. J Cataract
Refract Surg 2003; 29: 301–8.
4. Por YM, Lavin MJ. Techniques of intraocular
lens suspension in the absence of capsular/
zonular support. Surv Ophthalmol 2005;
50: 429-62.
5. Cross HE, Jensen AD. Ocular
manifestation in the Marfan syndrome and
homocystinuria. Am J Ophthalmol 1973;
75: 405–20.
6. Lumme P, Laatikainen L. Exfoliation
syndrome and cataract extraction. Am J
Ophthalmol 1993; 116: 51–5.
7. Jensen AD, Cross HE, Paton D. Ocular
complications in the Weill-Marchesani
syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol. 1974; 77:
261-9.
8. Apple DJ, Price FW, Gwin T, et al:
Sutured retropupillary posterior chamber
intraocular lenses for exchange or
secondary implantation. The 12th annual
Binkhorst lecture, 1988. Ophthalmology
1989; 96: 1241-7.
9. Solomon K, Gussler JR, Gussler C, Van
Meter WS. Incidence and management
of complications of transsclerally sutured
posterior chamber lenses. J Cataract
Refract Surg 1993; 19: 488-93.
10. Mittra RA, Connor TB, Han DP, Koenig
SB, Mieler WF, Pulido JS. Removal of
dislocated intraocular lenses using pars
plana vitrectomy with placement of an
open-loop, flexible anterior chamber lens.
Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 1011-4.
11. Auffarth GU, Wesendahl TA, Brown SJ,
Apple DJ. Are there acceptable anterior
chamber intra-ocular lenses for clinical
use in the 1990s? An analysis of 4104
explanted anterior chamber intra-ocular
lenses. Ophthalmology 1994, 101:1913–
22.
12. Malbran ES, Malbran E Jr, Negri I.
Lens guide suture for transport and
fixation in secondary IOL implantation
after intracapsular extraction. Int
Ophthalmol.1986; 9: 151-60.
13. Guell JL, Barrera A, Manero F. A review of
suturing techniques for posterior chamber
lenses. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2004 ; 15:
44-50.
14. Kaynak S, Ozbek Z, Pasa E, Oner FH,
Cingil G. Transscleral fixation of foldable
intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract
Surg. 2004; 30: 854-7.
15. Taskapili M, Gulkilik G, Engin G, Kocabora
MS, Yilmazli C, Ozsutcu M, Kucuksahin
H. Transscleral fixation of a single-piece
hydrophilic foldable acrylic intraocular lens.
Can J Ophthalmol. 2007; 42: 256-61.
16. Oshima Y, Oida H, Emi K: Transscleral
fixation of acrylic intra-ocular lenses in
the absence of capsular support through
3.5 mm self-sealing incisions. J Cataract
Refract Surg 1998, 24:1223–9.
17. Yoshida A, Ogasawara H, Jalkh AE,
Sanders RJ, McMeel JW, Schepens CL.
Retinal detachment after cataract surgery.
Surgical results. Ophthalmology 1992;
99: 460–5.
18. Davison JA. Acute intraoperative
suprachoroidal hemorrhage in capsular
bag phacoemulsification. J Cataract
Refract Surg 1993; 19: 534–7.
19. Pendergast SD, Margherio RR, Williams
GA, Cox MS Jr. Vitrectomy for chronic
pseudophakic cystoid macular edema. Am
J Ophthalmol 1999; 128: 317–23.
20. Büyüktortop N, Alp MN, Kural G.
Skleral fiksasyonlu arka kamara lensi
implantasyonu: Etioloji ve cerrahi
zamanlama yönünden güvenilirlik ve
görsel başarı. Glokom-Katarakt 2006; 1:
47-52.
21. Ridley NHL. Intraocular acrylic lenses.
Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK & Oxford
Ophthalmol Congress . 1951;LXXI:617-
21.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com