Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Sınıf II maloklüzyonların tedavisinde kullanılan fonksiyonel ortopedik apareyler

Functional orthopedic appliances used in the treatment of class II malocclusion

Journal Name:

  • Smyrna Tıp Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2012

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
Functional orthopedic treatment seeks to correct malocclusions and harmonize the shape of the dental arch and orofacial functions. There are two types of functional orthopedic appliance known as removable and fixed functional appliances. A number of fixed appliances have gained popularity in recent years to help achieve better results in non-compliant patients.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Fonksiyonel ortopedik tedavi, maloklüzyonları düzeltmeye ve orofasial fonksiyonlarla dental ark yapısını harmonize etmeye çalışır. Sabit ve hareketli olmak üzere 2 tip fonksiyonel ortopedik aparey tipi mevcuttur. Son yıllarda çok çeştitli sabit fonksiyonel aparey, koopere olmayan hastalarda çok iyi sonuçlar elde edilmesini sağlayarak popülarite kazanmıştır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-sinif-ii-malokluzyonlarin-tedavisinde-kullanilan-fonksiyonel-ortopedik-apareyler.pdf
  • 2
48-52
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Ingerval B. Prevalance of dental and occlusal
anomalies in Swedish conscipts. Acta Odontol Scand
1974; 32:83-92.
2. Kim Y.H. A comparative cephalometric study of Class
II div 1 nonextraction and extraction cases. Br J
Orthod 1979; 49:77-84.
3. Jean Y., Chen , Leslie A:W:, Richard N. Analysis of
efficacy of functional appliances on mandibular
growth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthod 2002; 470-
476.
4. Ülgen M. Ortodontik tedavi prensipleri Ankara
Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Yayınları: 186.
Baskı. Ankara, 2003.
5. Rakosi T. Treatment of Class II malocclusions. In:
Graber T:M: , Rakosi T., Petrovic A.G. Dentofacial
orthopedics with functional appliances. St. Louis:
Second Ed. Mosby-Year Book. Inc. 1997: 421.
6. McNamara JA, Howe RP, Dischinger TG. A
comparison of the Herbst and Frânkel appliances in
the treatment of Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod
Dentofac Orthop 1990; 98:134-144.
7. Bishara SE, Ziaja RR. Fuctional appliances: A review.
Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1989; 95:250-258.
8. Gottfried PF, Schmuth GP. Milestone in the
development and practical applications of functional
appliances. Am J Orthod 1983; 84:48-53.
9. Vargevik K, Harvold EP. Response to activator
treatment in Class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod
1985; 88:242-251.
10. Pancherz H. A cephalometric analysis contributing of
skeletal and dental changes contributing to Class II
correction in activator treatment. Am J Orthod
Dentofac Orthop 1984; 85:124-134.
11. Wieslander L, Lagerstörm L. The effect of activator
treatment on Class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod
1979; 75:20-26.
12. Lange DW, Kalra V, Broadbent BH, Powers M,
Nelson S. Changes in soft tissue profile follovving
treatment with the bionator. Angle Orthod 1995; 6:423-
430.
13. Frânkel R. Decrowding during eruption under the
screening influence of vestibular shields. Am J Orthod
1974; 64:372-406.
14. McNamara JA, Howe RP, Dischinger TG. A
comparison of the Herbst and Frânkel appliances in
the treatment of Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod
Dentofac Orthop 1990; 98:134-144.
15. Carels C, van der Linden FPGM. Concepts on
functional appliances mode of action. Am J Orthod
Dentofac Orthop 1987; 92:162-168.
16. Bishara SE, Ziaja RR. Fuctional appliances: A review.
Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1989; 95:250-258.
17. Creekmore TD, Radney LJ. Frânkel appliance therapy:
Orthopedic or orthodontic? Am J Orthod 1983; 2:89-
108.
18. Nielsen IL. Facial grovvth during treatment with the
function regulator appliance. Am J Orthod 1984;
85:401-410.
19. Pancherz H. The Herbst appliance: Its biologic
effects and clinical use. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop
1985; 87:1-20.
20. Pancherz H. The mechanism of Class II correction in
Herbst appliance treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac
Orthop 1982; 104-113.
21. Weiland FJ, Bantleon HP. Treatment of Class II
malocclusions with the Jasper Jumper appliance. A
preliminary report. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthotop
1995; 108:341-350.
22. Orgun A. Iskeletsel Sınıf II olgularda Jasper Jumper
apareyinin tedavi etkinliğinin sefalometrik araştırılması.
Marmara Üniversitesi, Doktora tezi, İstanbul, 1995.
23. Karaçay S., Akın E., Ölmez H., Gürton Ü., Sagdıç D.
Forsus Nitinol Flat Spring and Jasper Jumper
corrections of Class II division 1 malocclusions. Angle
Orthod 2006; 76:666-672.
24. DeVincenzo J. The Eureka Spring: A new interarch
force delivery system. J Clin Orthod 1997; 31:454-
467.
25. Jeff Rothenberg, Eric S. Campbell, Ravindra
Nanda. Class II Correction with the Twin Force Bite
Corrector. J Clin Orthod 2004: 232-240.
26. Gönner U, Özkan V, Jahn E, Toll ED. Effect of the
MARA appliance on the position of the lower
anteriors in children, adolescents and adults with class
II malocclusion. J Orofac Orthop 2007; 68:397–412.
27. Castanon R, Valdes MS, White LW. Clinical use of
the Curro Jumper. J Clin Orthod 1998;32: 731-745.
İletişim:
Dr.Dt. Nur Özel
Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi
Ortodonti Anabilim Dalı Isparta-Türkiye
Tel: +90.246.2113374
e-mail: dtnur82@gmail.com

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com