Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

ÇOK DÜZLEMLİ AVRUPA BİRLİĞİNDE ÇEVRE POLİTİKASI ENTEGRASYONU ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME: SEKTÖREL KOORDİNASYON VE BÖLGESELLİK

AN ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY INTEGRATION IN MULTI-LEVELLED EU: SECTORAL COORDINATION AND REGIONALISM

Journal Name:

  • Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2009
Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Environmental policies in the EU has been founded upon economical concerns since the 1970s.These policies focused on sustainability with the report Our Common Future have acquired a multi-level, multi-actor and poly-centric character since the 1990s. The so called EPI (environmental policy integration) and Multi-level Governance Project launched by the EU in 2006 calls for the integration of environmental policies with other sectoral policy areas such as social and economical, and therefore aims to achieve sustainable development. However, the administrative and political setting of the EU poses an anti-ground to this integration. Even if its multi-actored, multi-levelled and centered structure allows for internal integration, inter Çevre politikası entegrasyonu, çok düzlemli yönetişim, sürdürülebilirlik, sektörel koordinasyon Environmental policy integration, multi-level governance, sustainability, sectoral coordination.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
AB'de çevre politikaları 1970'lerden bu yana ekonomik temeller üzerine kurulmuştur. Ortak Geleceğimiz isimli raporla birlikte sürdürülebilirliğe odaklanan AB çevre politikaları 1990'lardan bu yana AB genişleme politikalarının da etkisiyle çok düzlemli ve çok aktörlü bir karaktere bürünmüştür. AB'nin 2006'da başlatmış olduğu ÇPE (çevre politikası entegrasyonu)ve Çok Düzlemli Yönetişim projesi çevresel politikaların hem kendi içinde hem de sosyal, ekonomik alanlar gibi diğer sektörel alanlarla birleşmesini ve bu yolla da sürdürülebilir kalkınmayı başarmayı hedeflemektedir. Oysa AB'nin idari ve politik yapısı bu entegrasyona karşıt bir zemin oluşturmaktadır; çünkü AB'nin çok aktörlü, düzlemli ve merkezli yapısı içsel entegrasyona izin verse bile sektörler arası koordinasyonu imkânsız kılmaktadır. Buna ek olarak AB'nin yerelleşme ve bölgeselleşme çabaları ulusal hükümetlerle iletişimini koparmakta ve dolayısıyla da politik hiyerarşide kopukluk oluşmaktadır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-cok-duzlemli-avrupa-birliginde-cevre-politikasi-entegrasyonu-uzerine-bir-degerlendirme-sektorel-koordinasyon-bolgesellik.pdf
  • 1
221-237
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. STEINAR, Andresen., The Role of the UN in Global Environmental Governance: Potential for Increased Effectiveness? International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Special Issue, 7(4): 317-468, 2007.
2. BAKER, Susan., The dynamics of European Union biodiversity policy: Interactive, functional and institutional logics, Environmental Politics
12(3): 23-41, 2003.
3. BETSILL, Michele M. and BULKELEY, Harriet., 'Cities and the multilevel governance of global climate change.' Global Governance 12(2): 141-159, 2006.
4. DINGWERTH, Klaus and PATTBERG Philipp, 'Global governance as a perspective on world politics.' Global Governance, 12(2), pp. 185¬203, 2006.
5. ECKERBERG Katarina and JOAS Mark, 'Multi-level Environmental Governance: a concept under stress?', Local Environment 9(5): 405¬412, 2004.
235
MAZI
2009
6. EUROPEAN ECOFORUM, Background Paper for the Round Table on Environmental Policy Integration at the 5th Environment for Europe
Ministerial Conference. Kyiv, May 21-23, 2003.
7. FITZMAURICE, Malgosia, International protection of the environment, Recueil des Cours 293, 9-488, 2001.
8. GBIKPI, Bernard and GROTE J. R,. From Democratic Government to Participatory Governance, Jürgen R. Grote and Bernard Gbikpi (eds.): Participatory Governance: Political and Social Implications; Opladen: Leske + Budrich, 17-34. 2002
9. HERTIN, Julia, and BERKHOUT Frans, Ecological Modernisation and
EU Environemntal Policy Integration, Journal of Environmental Policy
and Planning, 5 (1):39-56. 2001.
10. HOMEYER, Ingmar von): EPIGOV Common Framework, EPIGOV Paper No. 1, Ecologic - Institute for International and European Environmental Policy: Berlin, 2006.
11. HOMEYER, Ingmar von and KNOBLAUCH Doris , 'Environmental Policy Integration and Multi-Level Governance - A State-of-the-Art Report', EPIGOV Paper No. 31, Ecologic -Institute for International and European Environmental Policy: Berlin, 2008.
12. HOOGHE, Liesbet, Cohesion Policy and European Integration:Building Multi-Level Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
13. HOOGHE, Liesbet and MARKS, Garry, 'Types of Multi-Level
Governance', European Integration online Papers (EIOP) 5(11), 2001.
14. HOORNBEEK, John A., 'Policy-making institutions and water policy outputs in the European Union and the United States: a comparative analysis' Journal of European Public Policy 11(3): 461-496, 2004.
15. IHDP, International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change, Institutional Dimensions of Global Environmental Change. Science Plan, IHDP Report 9, Bonn: IHDP,
1999.
16. JORDAN, Andrew, Introduction: the construction of a multilevel environmental governance system, Environment and Planning C-Government and Policy 17(1): 1-17, 1999.
17. JORDAN, Andrew, 'The multi-level politics of European environmental governance: A review article.' Public Administration 77(3): 662-671,
1999.
18. JORGENSEN, Knud E. and ROSAMOND Ben, Europe: Regional
Laboratory for a Global Polity?, CSGR Working Paper, No. 71/01, Warwick: Centre for the Study of Globalization and Regionalization,2001.
19. KEATING, Michael, Thirty Years of Territorial Politics, West
European Politics, 31(1): 60-81. 2008
20. LAFFERTY, William M. and HOVDEN, Eivind, Environmental policy
integration: Towards an analytical framework, Environmental Politics
12(3): 1-22, 2003
21. LENSCHOW, Andrea, Environmental policy integration: greening sectoral policies in Europe, London, Earthscan, 2002.
22. MARKS, Gary and HOOGHE Liesbet, Contrasting Visions of Multi¬level Governance, in: Ian Bache and Matthew Flinders (ed.): Multi-level Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 15-30, 2004.
23. MCGOLDRICK, Dominic, Sustainable development and human rights: An integrated approach, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 45 (4): 796-818. 1996.
24. PETERS, B. Guy and PIERRE, Jon, 'Multi-level Governance and
Democracy:A faustian Bargin'.
Multi-leve
l Governance, I. Bache and M. Flinders. Oxford, Oxford. University Pres, 2004.
25. ROSENAU, James N., Ernst-Otto CZEMPIEL, Governance Without
Government: Order and Change in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres, 1992.
26. SABEL, Charles and ZEITLIN Jonathan, Learning from Difference: The New Architecture of Experimentalist Governance in the European Union, European Governance Papers (EUROGOV), http://www.connex-network.org/eurogov/pdf/egp-connex-C-07-02.pdf (20.03.2009).
27. SCHMITTER, Philippe C., Democracy in Europe and Europe's Democratization, Journal of Democracy 14 (4):71-85. 2003.
28. SCHOUT, Adriaan and JORDAN, Andrew, Coordinated European
governance: Selforganizing or centrally steered? Public Administration,
83(1): 201-220, 2005.
29. SIMMONS, Beth A., and MARTIN Lisa L., International organizations
and institutions. In Handbook of International Relations, edited by Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, and Beth A. Simmons, 192-211. London: Sage, 2002.
30. WEALE, Albert, PRIDHAM, Geoffrey et al., Environmental
Governance in Europe. Oxford, Oxford University Pres, 2000.
31. YOUNG, Oran R., KING Leslie A. and SCHROEDER Heike,
Institutions and Environmental Change: Principal Findings, Applications, and Research Frontiers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Pres,
2009.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com