Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Panoramik radyografilerde ortaya çıkan hataların tipleri ve sıklığı

The types and frequency of errors in panoramic radiographs

Journal Name:

  • Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2004

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Aim: To identify the type and frequency of errors in diagnostically unacceptable panoramic radiographs. Materials and Methods: Diagnostically unacceptable 500 panoramic radiographs were reviewed and errors were classified as positioning and technical errors. The type and frequency of errors were determined. Results: Twenty different types of errors were encountered. The most common error was patient's not positioning the tongue in the palate during exposure. Tipping the patient's chin too far downward, and forward were the other frequent positioning errors. The most frequent technical errors were processing solution stains and density errors. Conclusion: Proper patient positioning and instructioning are significant factors in improving the quality in panoramic radiography.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Amaç: Tekrar gerektiren panoramik radyografilerdeki hataların tip ve sıklığını belirlemek. Gereç ve Yöntem: Tekrar gerektiren 500 panoramik radyografi incelendi ve hatalar pozisyonlandırma hataları ve teknik hatalar olarak sınıflandırıldı. Hata tipleri ve görülme sıklıkları belirlendi. Bulgular: Yirmi farklı tipte hata ile karşılaşıldı. En sık rastlanan hata ışınlama sırasında hastanın dilini damağına değdirmemiş olmasıydı. Hastanın başının fazla öne eğilmiş ve fazla önde konumlanmış olması sık rastlanan diğer pozisyonlandırma hatalarıydı. Banyo lekeleri ve yoğunluk hataları en sık rastlanan teknik hatalardı. Sonuç: Hastaların radyografi çekimleri sırasında doğru şekilde pozisyonlandırılması ve bilgilendirilmesi, panoramik radyografi uygula¬malarında kaliteyi arttıracak en önemli faktörlerdir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-panoramik-radyografilerde-ortaya-cikan-hatalarin-tipleri-sikligi.pdf
  • 2
1-5
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Gratt BM. Panoramic radiography. In: Stuart C. White, Michael J. Pharoah, Donald O'Connor. Oral Radiology: Principles and Interpretation. (5th ed) Elsevier Science, 2003; 191-210
2. Chaushu S, Chaushu G, Becker A. The use of panoramic radiographs to localize displaced maxillary canines. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Radiol Endod 1999; 88(4): 511-6
3. Ferguson JW, Evans RI, Cheng LH. Diagnostic accuracy and observer performance in the diagnosis of abnormalities in the anterior maxilla: a comparison of panoramic with
S.D.Ü. Tıp Fak.
Derg
. 2004;11(2):1-5
Aydın,
Panorami
k radyografi hataları
5
intraoral radiography. Br Dent J 1992; 173(8): 265-271
4. Mattick CR, Carter NE, Gordon PH. The diagnostic value of routine intra-oral premaxillary radiographs in orthodon¬tic assessment. Int J Paediatr Dent 1999; 9(3): 161-8
5.
Açıkgö
z A. Ortopantomografilerin klinik kullanımları. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 1996; 6 (2): 80-5
6. Azevedo LR, Damante JH. The image of the hard palate/nasal fossa floor in panoramic radigraphy: the con¬troversy is over. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral
Radiol Endod 2001; 92(4): 458-464
7.
Çelen
k P. Ortopantomografide sert damak görüntülerinin incelenmesi. HÜ Dişhek Derg 1990; 14 (3): 175-8
8. Çolak M, Atakul F. Panoramik radyografilerde foramen mentale'nin görülebilen varyasyonlarının prevalansları. DÜ Dişhek Fak Derg 2002; 8 (1): 1-6
9. McVaney TP, Kalkwarf KL. Misdiagnosis of an impacted supernumerary tooth from a panographic radiograph. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1976; 41(5): 678-681
10. Levy AR. Supernumerary tooth artifact on a panoramic radiograph. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1982; 54(4):
477
11. Crowley JF. Double image in panoramic roentgenograph. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1978; 46(3): 463-4
12. Gupta SK. A defect of the orthopantomograph: simulated fracture of the mandible. Brit Dent J 1973; 135(12): 541-2
13. Rumberg H, Hollender L, Oda D. Assessing the quality of radiographs accompanying biopsy specimens. JADA 1996;
127(3): 363-8
14. Brezden NA, Brooks SL. Evaluation of panoramic dental radiographs taken in private practice. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1987; 63(5): 617-621
15. Rushton VE, Horner K, Worthington HV. The quality of panoramic radiographs in a sample of general dental prac¬tices. Br Dent J 1999; 186(12): 630-3
16. Schiff T, D'Ambrosio J, Glass BJ, Langlais RP, McDavid WD. Common positioning and technical errors in panoram¬ic radiography JADA 1986; 113(3): 422-6
17. Scheifele C, Lemke A-J, Reichart PA. Hair artefacts in the head and neck region Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003; 32(4):
255-7
18. Mckee IW, Williamson PC, Lam EW, Heo G, Glover KE, Major PW. The accuracy of 4 panoramic units in the projec¬tion of mesiodistal tooth angulations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002; 121(2): 166-175
19. Scarfe WC, Eraso FE, Farman AG. Characteristics of the Orthopantomograph OP 100. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998; 27(1): 51-7
20. Mckee IW, Glover KE, Williamson PC, Lam EW, Heo G, Major PW. The effect of vertical and horizontal head posi¬tioning in panoramic radiography on mesiodistal tooth
angulations. Angle Orthod 2001(6); 71: 442-451
21. Xie Q, Soikkonen K, Wolf J, Mattila K, Gong M, Ainamo A. Effect of head positioning in panoramic radiography on vertical measurements: an in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1996; 25(2): 61-6
22. Payne M. A novel panoramic artefact. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 1989; 18(3): 138-9
23. Sanderink GCH. Visser WN, Kramers EW. The origin of a case of severe image distortion in rotational panoramic radi¬ography. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 1991; 20(3): 169-171

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com