Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Dudak damak yarığının overdenture ile rehabilitasyonu

Rehabilitation of cleft lip and palate with overdenture

Journal Name:

  • Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2008

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Maxillary defects are created by surgical treatment of benign or malignant neoplasms, by trauma and congenital malformation. Lack of support, stability and retention are common prosthodontic treatment problems for patients who have maxillary defects. The size and location of the defects influence the patients clinic status and determine difficulty in prosthetic rehabilitation. When cleft lip and palate is in question most common difficulties are insufficient alveolar bone quality and quantity, inadequate soft tissue, and poor abutment teeth. Cleft lip and palate patients may reconstructed with conventional prostheses or implant retained prostheses and clinicians still face some difficulties in prosthetic reconstruction. In this case report, to restore masticatory function and improve speech and esthetics of the 23 years old cleft lip and palate patient an overdenture prosthesis is used and benefits and disadvantages of prosthetic reconstruction are discussed.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Maksiller defektler benign ya da malign neoplasmlar nedeniyle uygulanan cerrahi girişimler sonucunda, travma ve konjenital malformasyonlar nedeniyle oluşabilmektedir. Maksiller defekt hastalarının protetik tedavilerinde destek ve denge eksikliği ile tutuculuk sorunlarıyla da sıklıkla karşılaşılmaktadır. Defektin büyüklüğü ve konumu hastanın klinik durumunu ve protetik rehabilitasyonun başarısını etkileyebilmektedir. Dudak damak yarığı söz konusu olduğunda; alveoler kemik kalitesi ve miktarı, uygun olmayan yumuşak doku ve zayıf destek dişler sıklıkla rastlanılan zorluklar arasında gözlenmektedir. Dudak damak yarığı vakaları, geleneksel veya implant destekli protezler ile rehabilite edilebilmektedir ve tedavisinde diş hekimleri sıklıkla çeşitli zorluklarla karşılaşabilmektedir. Bu vaka raporunda, 23 yaşındaki dudak damak yarığı nedeniyle kliniğimize başvuran hastaya, konuşma, çiğneme ve estetik problemlerini gidermek için overdenture uygulanarak, protetik rehabilitasyonun avantaj ve dezavantajları tartışıldı.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-dudak-damak-yariginin-overdenture-ile-rehabilitasyonu.pdf
  • 4
34-38
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Strauss RP. The organization and delivery of craniofacial health services: the state of the art. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1999;36: 189-195.
2. Beumer III J, Curtis TA, Marunik MT. Maxillofacial Rehabilitation. Prosthodontic and Surgical Considerations. Ishiyaku EuroAmerica, Inc. St Louis 1996; 225-247.
3. Vaderas AP, Incidence of cleft lip, cleft palate and cleft lip and palate among races: a review. Cleft palate J 1987; 24: 216-225.
4. Murray JC, Daack-Hirsch S, Buetow KH. Clinical and epidemiologic studies of cleft lip and palate in the Philipines. CleftPalate J 1997; 34: 7-10.
5. Murray JC. Gene/environment causes of cleft lip and/or palate. Clin Genet 2002; 61: 248-256.
S.D.Ü. Tıp Pak.
Derg
. 2008:15(4)/ 34-38
38
Türkaslan, Dudak damak yarığı ve overdenture
6. Epker BN, Fish LC. Dentofacial deformities. Integrated orthodontics and surgical correction. St Louis: CV Mosby 1986; 642-709.
7. Jayasekera T, Hall R, Lopacki S. Management ofcleft lip and palate. In: Cameron A, Widmer R. Handbook ofPediatric Dentistry. St Louis CV Mosby 1998; 289¬306.
8. Moyers RE. Handbook oforthodontics. 4th ed. Chicago: YearBookMedicalPublishers 1988; 19-27.
9. van Steenberghe D, Branemark P-I, Quirynen M, De Mars G, Naert I. The rehabilitation oforal defects by osseointegrated implants. J Clin Periodontol 1991;18:
488-493.
10. Bolender CL, Smith DE, Toolson LB. Overdentures: their effectiveness and clinical considerations in treating the partially dentate mouth. In: Bates JF, Neill DJ, Preiskel HW. Restoration ofthe Partially Dentate Mouth. Chicago Quint. Publ. Co. 1984; 127-143.
11. Basker RM, Harrison A, Ralph JP. Overdentures in general dental practice. 2nd ed Br Dent Assoc 1988;1-
77.
12. Heartwell Jr. CM, Rahn AO. Syllabus ofcomplete dentures. Lae & Febiger Philadelphia 1980; 483-501.
13. Schwartz IS, Morrow RM. Overdentures principles and procedures. In: Engelmeier RL. Complete dentures. DentClinNorthAm 1996;40:169-194.
14. vanderBiltA, vanKampenFM, Cune MS. Masticatory function with mandibular implant-supported overdentures fitted with different attachment types. EurJOralSci 2006;114: 191-196.
15. Menicucci G, Lorenzetti M, Pera P, Preti G. Mandibular implantretained overdenture: finite element analysis oftwo anchorage systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998; 13: 369-376.
16. Kennedy R, Richards M. Photoelastic stress patterns produced by implant retained overdentures. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 559-564.
17. Desjardins RP. Prosthesis design for osseointegrated implants in the edetulous maxilla. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992; 7: 311-320.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com