Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Tükürük bezi kitlelerinde histopatolojik çeşitlilik:158 olgunun analizi

Journal Name:

  • Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2011

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
Objective : To evaluate histopathological results with retrospective analysis of patients who came to our clinic with a salivary gland pathology. Material and methods: 158 patients (96 men, 62 women; mean age: 44.3; distribution 18-77) with parotid, submandibular and sublingual salivary gland pathology compliants (mass,pain) who came to our clinic between January 2000 and June 2009 had been included in this study. Data of salivary glands in which mass located and results of postoperative histopathological examinations were assessed. Results: 130 patients (82%) were operated because of parotid pathology, 26 of them(16%) because of submandibular gland pathology and 2 of them(1%) because of sublingual pathology. Histopathological results were 14(8,9%) malignant, 123(77.8%) benign and 21(13.3%) nonneoplastic. Of those who had been operated because of a parotid gland pathology 115(88.5%) were benign, 12(9.1%) malignant and 3(2.2%) nonneoplastic. Our submandibular gland results were 7(26.9%) benign, 18(69.2%) nonneoplastic and 1(3.9%) malignant. One of two cases who had been operated because of sublingual gland pathology was malignant and the other one was benign. Conclusion: Because of histopathological diversity; provisional diagnosis of salivary gland mass is important. Radiological techniques such as ultrasonography, computerized tomography and magnetic resonance and fine needle aspiration biopsi help us seperation of benign and malign histopathology. After diagnosing the salivary gland mass, the most appropriate surgical technique should be applied to the patient.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Amaç: Tükürük bezi patolojisi nedeniyle kliniğimize başvuran hastaları retrospektif olarak inceleyerek; histopatolojik sonuçlarını değerlendirmek. Hastalar ve yöntemler: Ocak 2000 ile Haziran 2009 tarihleri arasında parotis, submandibuler ve sublingual tükürük bezi patolojisi (şişlik, ağrı) şikayetleri ile kliniğimize başvuran 158 hasta (96 erkek, 62 kadın; ortalama yaş 44.3; dağılım 18-77) çalışmaya dahil edildi. Kitlelerin yerleştiği tükürük bezi ve postoperatif histopatolojik sonuçları değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Olgularımızın 130'u (% 82) parotis, 26'sı (% 16) submandibuler ve 2'si (% 1) sublingual tükürük bezi patolojisi nedeniyle opere edildi. Ameliyat sonrası vakalarımızın histopatolojik sonuçları toplamda 14'ü (% 8.8) malign, 123'ü (% 77.8) benign ve 21'i(% 13.3) ise nonneoplastikti. Bunlardan parotis bezi patolojisi ile opere olan hastaların 115'i (% 88.5) benign, 12'si (% 9.1) malign, 3'ü (% 2.2) nonneoplastik karakterdeydi. Submandibuler bezde olgularımız arasında 7 (% 26.9 ) benign, 18 (% 69.2) nonneoplastik histopatolojik sonuç var iken; 1(% 3.9) vakada malign patoloji mevcuttu. Sublingual bez patoloji nedeniyle opere edilen 2 olgumuzun 1'i benign, 1'i maligndi. Sonuç: Histopatolojik çeşitlilik nedeniyle tükürük bezi kitlesi ile başvuran hastalarda öntanı önemlidir. Ultrasonografi, bilgisayarlı tomografi, manyetik rezonans gibi radyolojik yöntemler ve ince iğne aspirasyon biyopsisi ile benign malign ayırımı yapılmaya çalışılmalıdır. Bu sonuç doğrultusunda hastaya en uygun cerrahi teknik uygulanmalıdır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-tukuruk-bezi-kitlelerinde-histopatolojik-cesitlilik158-olgunun-analizi.pdf
  • 3
82-85
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1.
Yağı
z C, Karaman E. Tükürük bezlerinin selim tümörleri. Türkiye Klinikleri.J Surg Med Sci (Özel sayılar) Kulak Burun Boğaz Dergisi 2007;3(36):22-6.
2. Spiro IJ, Wang CC, Montgomery WW. Carcinoma of the parotid gland. Analysis of treatment results and patterns of failure after combined surgery and radiation therapy. Cancer 1993; 71(9): 2699-705. PMID:8467451
3. Kane WJ, McCaffrey TV, Olsen KD, Lewis JE. Primary parotid malignancies. A clinical and pathologic review. Arch Otolaryngol HeadNeck Surg 1991; 117(3): 307¬15. PMID:1998571
4. Armstrong JG, Harrison LB, Thaler HT et al. The indications for elective treatment ofthe neck in cancer ofthe major salivary glands. Cancer 1992; 69(3): 615-9.PMID:1730113
5. Rice DH. Nonneoplastic diseases ofthe salivary glands. Otolaryngology'de. Ed. Paparella MM. 3th ed. Volume 3.Philadelphia, Saunders Comp 1993; 475-86.
6. Cuhruk
Ç
, Yılmaz O. Parotis bezi kitlelerinde tanı yöntemleri. Kulak Burun Boğaz ve Baş Boyun Cerrahisi Dergisi 1993; 1(3): 155-8
7. Seifert G, Miehlke A, Haubrich J ve ark. Diseases of the Salivary Glands. Stuttgart, Georg Thieme Verlag, 1986; 171-82.
8. Duck SW, McConnel FM. Malignant degeneration of pleomorphic adenoma-clinical implications. Am J Otolaryngol. 1993;14(3):175-8. PMID:8393306
9. Hicks J, Flaitz C. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of salivary glands in children and adolescents: assessment ofproliferationmarkers. Oral Oncol 2000; 36(5): 454¬60. PMID:10964053
10. Seifert G, Sobin LH. The World Health Organization's Histological Classification of salivary gland tumors. A commentary on the second edition. Cancer 1992; 70(2): 379-85. PMID:1617588
11. Matsuba HM, Mauney M, Simpson JR, Thawley SE, Pikul FJ. Adenocarcinomas ofmajor and minor gland
origin:a histopathologic review of treatment patterns.Laryngoscope 1988; 98(7): 784-8.
PMID:3386387
12. Koka VN, Tiwari RM, Van der Waal I ve ark. Adenoid cystic carcinoma ofsalivary glands: clinicopathological survey of51 patients. J Laryngol Otol 1989; 103(7): 675-9. PMID:2547888
13.
Yazıc
ı MF, Devge KC, Yücel Z, Erdibil H. 122 parotis tümöründe tedavi yöntemlerimiz ve sonuçları. Türk ORLArşivi 1996; 34(1): 19-22.
14. Hodgkinson DJ. Woods JE. The Influence ofFacial Nerve Sacrifice in Surgery Of Malignant Parotid Tumors. J Surg Oncol 1976; 8: 425-33.
15. Ball A, Thomas JM. Malignant Tumours ofThe Major Salivary Glands. In: Normon JED. Mcgurk (Eds). Salivary Glands Diseases, Disorders And Surgery. Mosby-Wolfe. Barcelona. 1995; 173-196.
16. Buchman C, Stringer SP, Mendenhall WM, Parsons JT, Jordon JR, Cassisi NJ. Pleomorfic adenoma: effect of tumor spill and inadequate resection on tumor recurrence. Laryngoscope 1994;104(110): 1231-4.
PMID:7934593
17. Altar B,
Özku
l MD, Tatar A, Uğur O, Kaptaner S, Ceylan S. Parotis kitlelerinde cerrahi prensipleri. Türk ORLArşivi 1995; 33(2):85-7.
18. Akbas Y, Tuna EU, Demireller A, Ozcan H, Ekinci C. Ultrasonography guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of parotid gland masses. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg. 2004;13:(1-2):15-8. PMID: 16027486
19. Kechagias N, Ntomouchtsis A, Valeri R, Patrikidou A, Kitikidou K, Xirou P et al. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of salivary gland tumours: a 10-year retrospective analysis. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Sep 6. [Epub ahead of print] PMID: 21894513
20. Lincoln GL Tan, Mark LC Khoo. Accuracy of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology and Frozen Section Histopathology for Lesions of the Major Salivary Glands. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2006;35:242-8. PMID:16710494

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com