Buradasınız

AMERİKA BİRLEŞİK DEVLETLERİ VE AVRUPA BİRLİĞl'NDE MENKUL KIYMETLEŞTİRME: TÜRKİYE'DE UYGULANABİLİR Mİ?

SECURITIZATION IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE EUROPEAN UNION: DOES IT WORK IN TURKEY?

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Keywords (Original Language):

Abstract (2. Language): 
Securitization is a process in which different assets or portfolios of cash own generating securities are pooled together and then sold to third parties. Recent global financial crisis demonstrate the need to create and implement regulatory frameworks that balance financial markets. In this context, Europeans have watched in bewilderment and amazement as the USA mortgage market cratered. The purpose of this article is to research the differences of securitisation between the USA and the European Union from a macroeconomic perspective. There is considerable evidence that securitisation in the USA and the EU indicate structural differences. Securitisation in most of the economies in the world is an attractive and potentially large source of long-term funding for mortgage markets. In addition, securitisation can be found both in developed and in emerging countries. Every year, all over the world, approximately US$5 trillion worth of funds are transferred to homebuyers over the capital markets. The lack of a modern housing finance system in Turkey prevents from taking advantage of these widely available funds and services. In this regard, another objective is to capture key trends for the securitisation in Turkey via secondary mortgage markets. The Mortgage Law was approved in March 2007 by the Turkish Grand Nation Assembly. This law encourages securitisations of mortgage loans in the best advantages of the financial systems and the borrowers. Because of its benefits; further encouragement should be provided for promoting securitisation in Turkey.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Menkul kıymetleştirme, nakit sahip olunan farklı varlık veya tahvillerin, menkul değerler ile birlikte toplandığı ve sonra da üçüncü bir yatırımcıya satıldığı bir süreçtir. Yaşanılan global kriz, finansal piyasaların dengelenmesi için düzenleyici kuralların yaratılıp uygulanması gereğini göstermektedir. Bu anlamda, Avrupa'lılar ABD'nin mortgage piyasasında yaşadığı düşüşünü hayretle ve şaşkınlıkla karşılamaktadırlar. Bu çalışmamızın amacı, ABD ve AB'deki menkul kıymetleştirmedeki farklılıkları makro ekonomi açısından araştırmaktır. Anılan ülkeler arasındaki menkul kıymetleştirmenin yapısal farklılıklar gösterdiğine ait yeterli kanıtlar mevcuttur. Menkul kıymetleştirme dünyanın çoğu ekonomilerindeki mortgage piyasaları için uzun erimli fon sağlamada cazip ve potansiyel geniş bir kaynaktır. Buna ilave olarak, menkul kıymetleştirme hem gelişmiş hem de gelişmekte olan ülkelerde görülmektedir. Dünya çapında her yıl konut alanlara yaklaşık 5 trilyon dolar sermaye piyasalarınca transfer edilmektedir. Türkiye'de bu türden modern bir konut finansmanının olmaması ülkemizi bu olanaktan yoksun bırakmaktadır. Bu anlamda, çalışmanın bir diğer amacı menkul kıymetleştirme ile ilgili anahtar trendleri ikincil mortgage marketler yoluyla elde etmektir. Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi' nde Mortgage Yasası 2007 Mart ayında kabul edildi. Bu yasa mortgage ile finans sistemine ve konut almak için borçlananlara en iyi avantajı kredilerle sağlayıp menkul kıymetleştirmeyi teşvik etmektedir. Getirdiği faydalarından dolayı da menkul kıymetleştirmeyi Türkiye'de tutundurmak için ona daha fazla ileri teşvikler sağlanmalıdır.
23
44

REFERENCES

References: 

Akçay,
B.
, ''An Assessment of the Housing Finance Strategies in Turkey'', Akademik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 5, 18, 2003, pp.45-55.
Altunbaş et al, Securitisation
an
d The Bank Lending Channel, ECB Working Papers No:838, 2007.
Ambrose, B. et al, The Measurement and Management of Mortgage Credit Risk in the US:Implications for Emerging Mortgage Markets, US Dept.of Housing and Urban Development Publ., 2007.
BIS, Financial Structure and Monetary Policy Transmission Mechanism, C.B 394, 1995.
Brooks Koeva, P., Does the Bank Lending Channel of Monetary Transmission Work in Turkey?, IMF Working Paper:WP/02/72, 2007.
Campbell, J., Cocco, J., ''How Do House Prices Affect Consumption ? Evidence From Micro Data'', Harvard Institute of Economic Research Working Papers 2083, Harward-Institute of Economic Research, 2005.
Chiquier, L. et al, Mortgage Securities in Emerging Markets, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper: 3370, 2004.
Coles, A., Hardt, J., ''Mortgage Markets :Why US and EU Markets Are So Different?'', Housing Studies,15(5), 2000, 775-783.
Çavuşoğlu, T.,
Credi
t Transmission Mechanism in Turkey :An Empirical Investigation, ERC Working Paper in Economics :02/03, 2002.
Debelle, G., Macroeconomic Implications of Rising Household Debt, BIS Working Paper No:153, 2004.
DPT, Strategy and Action Plan for Istanbul International Financial Center, (2009).
Floyd, S., Real Estate Principles, Chicago Third Ed, Longman Inc.,
1990.
Fu, D., National,Regional and Metro-Specific Factors of the US Housing Market.Fed.Reserve Bank of Dallas,Resaerch Dept.Working Paper No:0707, 2007.
Hilbers, P., et al, Real Estate Market Developments and Financial Sector Soundness, IMF Working Paper WP/01/129, 2001.
43
Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi
Haziran 2012 Cilt 14 Sayı 1 (23-44)
Kif,
J.
, Kisser, M., ''A Shot at Regulating Securitization'', Institutt For Foretaksokonomı, Department Of Finance And Management Science, Discussion paper, 2011.
Lamoreaux, P., Developing Secondary Mortgage Markets, IFC Publ.,
2003.
Lanza, K., ''Developing Secondary Mortgage Markets in Southeast Europe'', USAID Southeast Europe Financial Sector Conference Proceedings, 2003.
Medeiros, C., Rodriguez, M., The Dynamics of the Term Structure of Interest Rates in the United States in Light of the Financial Crisis of 2007-10,IMF WP/11/84, 2011.
Mishkin, F. S., Housing and the Monetary Transmission Mechanism, Fed.Reserve Board,Washington D.C ., 2007.
Order Van, R., Some Notes on What Can be Learned by Other Countries from American Secondary Mortgage Markets?, Fannie Mae Publ., 2003.
Pitman, P., Turkey A Country Study, Washington DC :Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Published Data, 1988.
Segre , N., A Comparison of Home Mortgage Loan Defaults And Foreclosures in The United States And in Certain European Union Countries, Including A Discussion of Governmental Responses and Some Observations Concerning Contributing Causes, European Real Estate Society Publ., 2010.
UN/ECE, Housing Finance Systems for Countries in Transition, UN/ECE Report, 2005.
Vink, D., Thibeault, A., ABS, MBS and CDO Compared :An Empirical Analysis, Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School Working Paper No:2008/04, 2008.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com