Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

LEARNERS‘ PERCEPTION OF BLENDED WRITING CLASS: Blog and Face-to-face

Journal Name:

  • The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education

Publication Year:

  • 2009

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The purpose of this research was to investigate student perception of blended writing classes. It was conducted with intermediate level EFL learners in the preparatory school at Anadolu University. Data consisted of student reflections. The first reflection aimed at finding out learners‘ perception of fall term writing lessons, and, the instant and final reflections aimed at finding out learner perception of blended writing lessons. Although learners‘ perception of writing lessons was negative in the first reflections, they changed into positive in the latter ones. The findings indicated that blended writing class had changed students‘ perception of writing lessons positively. Therefore, this kind of classes may help students develop a positive attitude towards writing by providing meaningful writing opportunities.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-learners-perception-blended-writing-class-blog-and-face-face.pdf
  • 4
188-202
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Ahonen, M., Joyce, B., Leino, M. & Turunen, H. (2003). ―Mobile Learning – A Different
Viewpoint‖. In: Kynäslahti, H. & Seppälä, P. (Eds.) Professional Mobile Learning.
Helsinki, IT Pres.
202
Brooks, D. (2001). W. Web Teaching. A Guide to Designing Interactive Teaching for the
World Wide Web. Second Edition. Kluwer Academic Publishers, USA.
Dudeney, G. and N. Hockly (2007). How to Teach English with Technology. Malaysia:
Pearson Education Limited.
Graham, C. R. (2006) Chapter 1: Blended learning systems: definiton, current trends,
future directions. In Bonk, C. J. and Graham, C. R. (eds.), Handbook of Blended
Learning: Global perspectives, local designs (2006). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer
Publishing.
Jonassen, D. H. (1992). Cognitive Tools for Learning. Ed by P. A. M. Kommers et al,
NATO.
Leone, S. (2008). The use of new technologies in advanced Italian Classes. In I. Olney,
G. Lefoe, J. Mantei, & J. Herrington (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second Emerging
Technologies Conference 2008 (pp.120-129). Wollongong: University of Wollongong.
Lockhart, C., and Ng, P. (1995). Analyzing Talk in ESL Peer Response Groups: Stances,
Functions and Content, Language Learning Vol. 46/3, pp. 274-283.
Mangelsdorf, K., (1992). ―Peer Reviews in the ESL Composition Classroom: What do the
Students Think‖. ELT Journal, Vol. 46/3, pp. 274-283
Mishan, F. (2004). Designing Authenticity into Language Learning Materials. Bristol,
GBR: Intellect Books.
Salaberry, M. R. (2003). The use of technology for second language learning and
teaching: A retrospective. The Modern language Journal, Vol. 85 No. 1 Special Issue: A
Century of Language teaching and research: looking Back and Looking Ahead, Part 2
(Spring, 2001), pp. 39-56.
Scagnoli, N. (2005) Blended learning: An instructional challenge and a learning
opportunityVoices 186, August/September.
Stracke, E. (2007). A road to understanding: A qualitative study into why learners drop
out of a blended language learning (BLL) environment. ReCALL 19 (1), pp. 57-78.
Tawney, J. W., & Gast, D. L. (1984). Single-subject research in special education.
Columbus, OH: Merrill.
Zhao, Y. (2001). Recent developments in technology and Language learning: A
literature review and Meta-analysis. CALICO Journal, 21 (1), pp. 7-27.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com