ASSESSMENT APPROACHES IN VIRTUAL LEARNING

Anderson, S., Ball, S., & Murphy, R. (1975). Encyclopedia of educational evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Bloxham, S., & Wset, A. (2004). Understanding the rules of the game: Marking peer assessment as a medium for developing students' conception of assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 39 (6), 721-733. Chang, C. C. (2001b). A study on the evaluation and effectiveness analysis of web-based learning portfolio (WBLP). British Journal of Educational Technology , 32 (4), 435-458. Chang, C. C. (2008). Enhancing self perceived effects using web-based portfolio assessment. Computers in human Behavior , 24, 1753-1771.
Consortium, e.-p. (2003). electronic portfolio white paper. Retrieved 12 30, 2006, from http://eportconsortium.org
47
Dennen, V. P. (2007). Looking for evidence of learning: Assessment and analysis methods for online discourse. Cmputers in Human Behavior . Dennis, C., Hardy, J., & White, P. (2006). Development of a model to advance the uptake of e-portfolios for undergraduates in teacher education and registered nurse preparation: An exemplar of best practice. Proceedings of Ed-Media (pp. 248-253). Norfolk, VA: AACE. Kandan, M. (2000). Web based assessment system for IT course: A new perspective. USA. Kankaanranta, M., Barrett, H. C., & Hartnell-Young, E. (2001). Exploring the use of electronic portfolios in international contexts. World conference on educational multimedia, Hypermedia and telecommunications (pp. 874-876). Norfolk, VA: AACE. Kuo, S. Y. (2004). Educational test and assessment. Taipe: Chin-Hau. Kwok, R. C., & Ma, J. (1999). Use of a group support system for collaborative assessment. Computers and Education , 32, 109-125. Lee, K. C. (1999). Multiple teaching assessment. Taipei: Shin-Lee. Lin, S. S., Liu, E. Z., & Yuan, S. M. (2001). Web-based peer assessment: Feedback for students with various thinking-styles. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 17, 420-432. Lopez-Fernandez, O., & Rodriguez-Illera, J. L. (2010). Investigating university students' adaption to a digital learner course portfolio. Computers & Education , 52, 608-616. Mcloughlin, C., & Luca, J. (2006). Best practice in online assessment: Principles, process and outcomes. In E. Pearson, & Bohman (Ed.), Proceedings of Ed-Media (pp. 2375-2382). Norfolk, VA: AACE. Offir, B., Barth, I., Lev, Y., & Shteinbok, A. (2003). Teacher-student interactions and learning outcomes in a distance learning environment. Internet and Higher Education , 6, 65-75. Ou, C. H. (2004). Educational test and assessment. Taipe: Shin-Lee. Pajares, M. F., & Graham, L. (1998). Formalist thinking and language arts instruction: Teacher's and student's beliefs about truth and caring in the teaching conversation. Teaching & Teache Education , 14 (8), 855-870. Palombra, C., & Banta, T. (1999). Assessment essentials: Planning implementing and improving assessment in higher education. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Peterson, E. R., & Irving, S. E. (2008). Secondary school students' conceptions of assessment and feedback. learning and Instruction , 18 (3), 238-250. Plutsky, S., & Wilson, B. A. (2004). Comparison of the three methods for teaching and evaluating writing: A quasi-experimental study. The Delta Pi Epsilon Journal , 46 (1), 50-61. Popham, W. J. (2002). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
48
Rada, R., & Hu, K. (2001b). Patterns in student-student commenting. IEEE Transactions on Education , 44, 246-251. RRovai, A. P. (2000). Online and traditional assessments: What is the difference? Internet and Higher Education, 3, 141-151. Schacter, J., Herl, H. E., Chung, G. K., Dennis, R. A., O'Neil, H. F., & Jr. (1999). Computer-based performance assessments: A solution to the narrow measurement and reporting of problem-solving. Computers in Human Behavior , 15, 403-418. Seal, K. C., & Przasnyksi, Z. H. (2001). Using the world wide web for teaching improvement. Computers and Education, 36, 33-40. Sluijsmans, D., Dochy, F., & Moerkerke, G. (1999). Creating a learning environment by using self-, peer- and co-assessment. Learning Environment Research, 1, 293-319. Smith, H., Cooper, A., & Lancaster, L. (2002). Improving the quality of undergraduate peer assessment: A case study from psychology. Innovations in education and teaching international, 39, 71-81. Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., Chiou, S. K., & Hou, H. T. (2005). The disign and application of a web-based self- and peer-assessment system. Computers & Education, 45, 187-202. Topping, K. J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68, 249-276. Topping, K., Smith, F. F., Swanson, I., & Elliot, A. (2000). Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25 (2), 149-169. Tsai, C. C., Lin, S. S., & Yuan, S. M. (2002). Developing science activities through a networked peer assessment system. Computers and Education , 38, 241-252. Tsai, C. C., Liu, E. Z., Lin, S. S., & Yuan, S. M. (2001). A network peer assessment system based on a Vee heuristic. Innovations in Education and Training International , 220-230. Xiao, Y., & Lucking, R. (2008). The impact of two types of peer assessment on students' performance and satisfaction within a Wiki environment. Internet and Higher Education .