Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

PRE-SERVICE STUDENTS‘ CLASS STANDINGS AND THEIR PERCEPTIONS OF DISTANCE EDUCATION

Journal Name:

  • The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education

Publication Year:

  • 2011

Key Words:

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
The efficacy of distance education programs has been in the minds of those who do not view distance learning as being as good as face-to-face (FTF) instruction. Questions abound regarding this type of delivery, however, this method is growing in popularity especially among individuals who are much older and those who would like to leverage technology. School districts and traditional universities are now embracing this method in one form or the other. Although there is increasing popularity, there is still one unexplored area of distance education. One such area is the relationship between students‘ academic standing and their perception, specifically in the area of teacher education. The study revealed that pre-service teachers at the beginning stage of their program were significantly more satisfied, overall, with distance courses and programs, than those at the end of their program. Students near the beginning and middle of their program rated grading and timely return of assignments, a sense of accomplishment, and willingness to take additional distance courses, significantly higher than those who were at the end of their program. However, the opportunity to know others in the distance class, although rated low, was higher for students at the end of their program. The study revealed that those in education should plan programs that will address the idiosyncrasies at all levels, thereby resulting in satisfaction on the part of student teachers.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-pre-service-students-class-standings-and-their-perceptions-distance-education.pdf
  • 1
138-151
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Aljarrrah, A. (2000), Distance education: Community college students‘ perspectives and Attitudes toward online courses. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.
Allen, M., Bourhis, J., Burrell, N., & Mabry, E. (2002). Comparing student satisfaction with distance education to traditional classrooms in higher education:
A met-analysis. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 83-87.
Allen, I. E, Seaman, J., & Garrett, R. (2007), Blending in: The extent and promise of
Blended education in the United States, the Sloan Consortium, Needham, MA.
Allen, I. E & Seaman, J. (2004), Entering the mainstream: The quality and extent of
Online education in the United States, 2003 and 2004. The Sloan Consortium,
http://www. Sloan-c.org/resources/survey.asp retrieved 11/22/04.
Conger, S. M. (2005), If there is no significant difference, why should we care? The Journal of Educators Online, 2(2); July 2005 retrieved March 23, 2009.
www.thejeo.com/Archives/Volume2Number2/V2.htm#,
Grayson, J. (2010). E-Learning: Virtual P. E. No Sweat, THE Journal.com, 37(1), 28-31.
Howell, S. L., Williams, P. B., Lindsay, N. K. (2005), Thirty-two trends affecting
distance education, An informed foundation for strategic planning, retrieved, March 28, 2009. http://www.westga.edu~distance/ojdla/fall63/howell63.html
Inside Higher Ed (2008), With Students Flocking Online, Will Faculty Follow?
http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2008/11/18/online;retrieved, November.
Institute for Higher Education Policy. (1999). What‘s the difference: A review of
contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher
education. Washington, DC: Author.
Kumar, A. (1999). Learner Characteristics and Success in Indian Distance Education, Open Learning, p. 52-58.
Mantyla, K. & Woods. J. (2001). The 2001/2002 ASTC Distance Learning Yearbook, New York: McGraw Hill.
Merisotis, J. P. (1999). The ‗What‘s the Difference?‖ Debate. Academe. 85(5), 47-51.
Moore, M. G. & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance Education: A Systems View.
150
Boston:Wadsworth.
Moore, M. G. (2003), Distance learning-Trends in the US-Articles on flexible Learning And Distance Education, http://www.tbc.dk/pdf/michael_moore.pdf retrieved March 28, 2009.
Morgan, G. A., Griego, G. W.,Gloeckner, G. W.& Leech, N. L. (2001). SPSS for Windows: An Introduction to use and Interpretation in Research. Mahwah, N. J.
Nagel, D. (2010). Snapshot: Students Want Online Learning, THE Journal, Retrieved
March 17, 2010, from http://thejournal.com/Articles/2010/03/17/Snapshot--students-want-online...?
National Center for Education Statistics (1998). Distance education in higher education institutions: Incidence, audiences, and plans to expand. Retrieved November 1, 2002, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs98/98132.html
Navarro, P. & Shoemaker, J. (2000). Performance and perceptions of distance learners in cyberspace. The American Journal of Distance Education, 14 (2), 15-35.
Neuhauser, C. (2002). Learning style and effectiveness of online and face-to-face
Instruction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 99-113.
Phipps, R. & Merisotis, J. (1999). What‘s the difference? A review of contemporary
research on the effectiveness of distance education in higher Education,
Wahington DC: The Institute for Higher Education Policy.
Pershing, M. E. (2001). The Internet and Undergraduate Distance Education: Status of Non-Public Universities. Dissertations Abstract International, 62(03), 939B, UMI No. 3008947.
Roblyer, M. D. & Wiencke, W. R. (2003). Design and Use of a Rubric to Assess and
Encourage Interactive Qualities in Distance Courses. The American Journal of Distance Education, 17(2), 77-98.
Rosenberg. M. J. (2001). E-Learning Strategies for delivering knowledge in the Digital Age. New York: McGraw Hill.
Russell, T. (2002). ―The No Significant Difference Phomenon‖ as reported in 355
research reports, summaries and papers: A comprehensive research on
technology of distance education, WCET, No Significant difference website;
http:// www.nosignificandifference.org
Schulte, A. (2004). The development of an asynchronous computer mediated course: Observations on how to promote interactivity. College Teaching, 52(2), 6- 10.
Schwitzer, A. M., Ancis, J. R. & Brown, N. (2001). Promoting student learning and student development at a distance. Lanham, MD: American College Personnel Association.
Shachar, M, (2003), Differences Between Traditional and Distance Education Academic Performances: A meta-analytic approach; retrieved 13/3/0
151
http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/viewArticle/493/1147,
Sherry, L. (1996). Issues in Distance Learning. International Journal of Education and Telecommunications. 1(4), 337-365.
Tankersley, W. J. & Burnham, J. F. (2008), Distance Education in Georgia‘s Public
School Districts: Baseline Data on Utilization and the Perceived Barriers to
Implementation and Expansion; retrieved, 1/18/2008, http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter104/tankersley104.html;
Thomerson, J. D. (1995). Students‘ Perceptions of the Affective Experiences In
Distance Learning Courses. Dissertation Abstracts International, 56(05), 1751.
(UMI No. 9531182)
Thomerson, J. D. & Smith, C. L. (1996) Students‘ Perceptions of the Affective
Experiences encountered in Distance Learning courses, The American Journal of
Distance Education, 10(3), 37-48.
Waits, T., Lewis, L. & Green, B. (2003), Distance Education at degree granting
Postsecondary institutions: 2000-2001, Washington, DC; National Center for
Education Statistics.
Young, A. E. & Lewis, C. W. (2008) Teacher Education programs delivered at a distance: An examination of distance students‘ perceptions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(3), p. 601-609. Elsevier Ltd.
Young, A. E. (2004). Pre-service Teachers‘ Perceptions of Education Course or
Programs Delivered at a Distance. Unpublished Dissertation, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO.
Young, A. E. (2008). Classrooms without Walls: A Case for Borderless Education in the Caribbean, Journal of the University College of the Cayman Islands (JUCCI),
2(1), 114-125.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com