Buradasınız

EDUCATION FACULTY STUDENTS’ VIEWS ABOUT USE OF E-BOOKS

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

DOI: 
10.17718/tojde.40854
Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Parallel to technological developments, numerous new tools are now available for people’s use. Societies adapt these tools to their professional lives by learning how to use them. In this way, they try to establish more comfortable working environments. Universities giving vocational education are supposed to teach these new technologies to their students to help them become successful in their future profession. Books that serve as the basic sources of information for education faculty students are increasingly being transformed into e-books parallel to these new technologies. In line with these developments, identifying students’ approaches and preferences regarding e-book could help determine the needs regarding this type of new technologies. In line with this purpose, the present study aimed at determining the views and preferences of preservice teachers regarding e-book as well as their levels of general knowledge about this technology. The participants of the study were 1179 students attending an education faculty (660 female, 519 male). In the study, qualitative and quantitative methods were used together. The results revealed that the students did not have sufficient knowledge about e-book and that they regarded any digital source on the Internet as e-book. Of all the participating preservice teachers, only 6% of them had sufficient knowledge about ebook.
145
161

REFERENCES

References: 

Ahlroos, P., & Hahto, J. (2012). The e-reader: An educational or an entertainment tool? Ereaders
in an academic setting. Liber Quarterly, 21(2), 249–261.
Arch, X. (2012). Under the hood: E-textbooks and the library. Against the Grain, 24(1), 64.
Bahar, H. H., Icli, H. H. and Gulcati, F. (2010). Ortaogretim Ogretmenlerinin Bilgisayar ve
Internet Tutumlarinin Incelenmesi -Erzincan Ornegi-“ [An Investigation of the Computer and
Internet Attitude on High School Teachers -Sample of Erzincan-], Milli Egitim Dergisi, no: 186,
50-67.
Cassidy, E. D., Martinez, M., & Shen, L. (2012). Not in love, or not in the know? Graduate
student and faculty use (and non-use) of e-books. Journal of Academic of Librarianship, 38(6),
326–332.
Cliff, M., K. and Dearnley, J. (2003). Electronic book use in a public library. Journal of
Librarianship and Information Science., Vol.35, no.4:235-242.
Coolican, H. (1992). Research methods and statistics in psychology. London: Holder &
Stougtton.
Day, R. (2001). Reading the Future. Popular Mechanics, 178(4), 82-85.
Demir, U. F. Y. P., Cirak, Y., Dalkilinc, M., Yilmaz, G. D., Uras, I., & Komurcu, M. (2012). İlkokul
Çocuklarında Çanta Taşıma, Bilgisayar Kullanma Alışkanlığı ve Postür [The Habits Of Carrying
Bag, Computer Use And Posture In Primary School Children], Ankara Medical Journal, 12(4),
182-186.
Herlihy, C. S., & Yi, H. (2010). E-books in academic libraries: How does currency affect usage?
New Library World, 111(9–10), 371–380.
160
Herring, Susan C. (2001). Computer-mediated discourse. In Tannen, Deborah, Deborah
Schiffrin & Heidi Hamilton (eds.) Handbook of discourse analysis. Oxford: Blackwell. 612-634.
Hodges, D., Preston, C., & Hamilton, M. J. (2010). Resolving the challenge of e-books. Collection
Management, 35(3–4), 196–200.
Kang, Y. Y., Wang, M. J. J., & Lin, R. (2009). Usability evaluation of E-books. Displays, 30(2),
49-52.
Kemp, J., Lutz, E., & Nurnberger, A. L. (2012). E-readers on trial: Qualitative results from an
academic library pilot project. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 24(3), 189-203.
Lam, P., Lam, S-L. Lam, J., & McNaught, C. (2009). Usability and usefulness of eBooks on PPCs:
How students‟ opinions vary over time. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(1),
30–44.
Mallett, E. (2010). A screen too far? Findings from an e-book reader pilot. Serials, 23(2), 140-
144.
Marshall, C.C & Ruotolo, C. (2002). Reading in the small: a study of reading on small form
factor devices.
Moore, M. L. (2009). At your leisure. Assessing ebook reader functionally and interactivity.
University College London.
Nathaniel, S. (2010). The e-reader industry: Replacing the book or enhancing the reader
experience. Scroll. 1(1).
Palmer, P. & Donaldson, S., A. (2001). The e-book Revolution. Black Enterprise, 31(9), 49-50.
Pattuelli, M.C. & Rabina, D. (2010). Forms, effect, function: LIS students' attitude towards
portable e-book readers. Aslib Proceedings: New information perspectives, 62 (3),228-244.
Proceedings of Second ACM/IEEE-CS joint Conference on Digital Libraries. 56-64. Portland,
Oregon, July 2002.
Poftak, A. (2001). Getting a Read on E-books. Technology & Learning, 21(9), 22-24.
Rodzvilla, J. (2009). The portable e-book: Issues with e-book reading devices in the library.
Serials, 22(3), 6–10 (supplement).
Rukanci, F. & Anameric, H. (2003). E-Kitap Teknolojisi ve Kullanımı [E-books and Use of
Technology]. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 17, 2,147-166.
Seferoglu, S. S. (2004). Ogretmen Adaylarinin Ogretmen Yeterlilikleri Acisindan Kendilerini
Degerlendirmeleri [Self-sufficiency in terms of teacher-evaluation]. Hacettepe University
Faculty of Education Journal, 26, 131-140.
Siegenthaler, E., Wurtz, P., Groner, Rudolf. (2010). Improving the usability of E-book Readers.
Journal of Usability Studies . 6 (1), 25-38.
161
Slater, R. (2010). Why aren't e-books gaining more ground in academic libraries? E-book use
and perceptions: A review of published literature and research. Journal of Web Librarianship,
4(4), 305–331.
Smyth, S., & Carlin, A. P. (2012). Use and perception of ebooks in the University of Ulster: A
case study. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 18(2), 176–205.
Su, S. -F. (2005). Desirable search features of web-based scholarly e-book systems. Electronic
Library, 23(1), 64–71.
Vidana, Monica. (2003). E-books in public libraries. Libraries and Information Update.
Accessed: 01.07.2010 Available from: Available at
http://www.cilip.org.uk/update/issues/mayo3/article4may.html.
Wilson, R. (2003). Ebook readers in higher education. Educational Technology & Society, 6 (4),
8-17.
Wilkie, T., & Harris, S. (2010). E-books face bright future. Research Information, 46, 9.
Wittmann, A (2000). Bye Bye Books?. Network Computing, 11(22), 210.
Wolcott, H. F. (1990). On seeking-and rejecting-validity in qualitative research. Qualitative
inquiry in education: The continuing debate, 121-152.
Yalman, M., & Kutluca, T. (2012). Future of e-libraries in universities. Procedia-Social and
Behavioral Sciences , 47, 2225-2228.
Yalman, M., & Tunga, M. A. (2012). Universite Ogrencilerinin Bilgisayar Deneyimleri ile
Bilgisayar Algilarinin Bazi Değiskenlere Göre Incelenmes&# X0130... [University Students
Perceptions of Computer Experience With Computer Analysis of Some Variables: Case of Dicle
University] Dicle University Journal of Ziya Gokalp Education Faculty, 18.
Yalman, M., Gönen, S. & Başaran, B. (2013). Examining teachers’ internet use and attitudes in
terms of certain variables, International Journal of Social Science, 6(7), 1217-1231. Doi
number: http://dx.doi.org/10.9761/JASSS1722.
Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2004). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative
research methods in the social sciences], Ankara: Seckin Yayinevi.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com