Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

XLearning Object Organization Behaviors in a Home-Made Learning Content Management System

Journal Name:

  • The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education

Publication Year:

  • 2006

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This study designed, implemented and evaluated a learning content management system to facilitate creating both standard based and free style learning objects. The system, BULeCoMas, also enabled users to tag learning objects with usage data and tools supported with components accommodated under a Global Activity Center, are Global Task Pool, Experience Repository and Learner Record Repository. This study examined whether the experience in information technology use affect e-learning object authors’; - use of assets, - organization of assets and - embedding of instructional elements into their content authoring. The system, enabling common standards of reusable learning objects, was tested for ease of use with thirty-four novice and experienced preservice teachers. The participants found the system easy to use in general, novice and experienced information technology users were able to develop learning objects similar in size and features. The study suggests some further work for using the same system in collaborative learning object authoring.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-xlearning-object-organization-behaviors-home-made-learning-content-management-system.pdf
  • 4
36-54
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Akpinar, Y. (2002). Building in house learning management systems to fulfill
organizational requirements. Proceedings of ITHET02, pp. 89–94, Budapest,
Hungary.
Barr, M., Holden, S., Phillips, D. & Greening, T. (1999) An exploration of programming
errors in an object-oriented environment. SIGCSE Bulletin, 32(4), 42–46.
Barritt, C. & Alderman, F. L. (2004). Creating a Reusable Learning Objects Strategy:
Leveraging Information and Learning in a Knowledge Economy. San Francisco.
Pfeiffer.
53
Bell, B. (1999). Supporting educational software design with knowledge-rich tools.
International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10(1), 46-74.
Boot, E. (2005) Building-block solutions for developing instructional software. PhD
dissertation. Open University, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Boot, E. W. & Van Rooij, J. C. G. M. (1999). Structured Development of Computer
based Training with Templates: Analysis. (Report TM–99-A068), TNO Human Factors
Research Institute. Soesterberg, The Netherlands Based Training with Templates:
Analysis. (Report TM-99-A068), TNO Human Factors Research Institute. Soesterberg,
The Netherlands.
Boyle, T. (2003). Design principles for authoring dynamic, reusable learning objects.
Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 19(1), 46–58.
Chapman, B. & Hall, B. (2004). Learning Content Management Systems, New York.
Brandonhall.com Publications.
Elliott, G. J., Jones, E. & Barker, P. (2002) A grounded theory approach to modelling
learnability of hypermedia authoring tools. Interacting with Computers, 14(5), 547-
574.
Hackos, R. & Joann, T. (2002). Content Management For Dynamic Web Delivery. New
York, John Wiley & Sons.
Haggie, K. & Kingston, J. (2003). Choosing Your Knowledge Management Strategy,
Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, 13(1), 1-14.
IEEE (2005). LTSC Learning Object Metadata Working Group. Retrieved at 10 January
2005 from http://ltsc.ieee.org.
Jonassen, Z. D. & Churchill, D. (2004). Is there a learning orientation in learning
objects? International Journal on E-Learning, 3(2), 32-41.
Lazonder, A. W., Harm, J.A., Biemans, I., & Wopereis, G. J. H. (2000). Differences
between novice and experienced users in searching information on the World Wide
Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(6), 576–581.
Lee, G. & Su, S. Y. W. (2006). Learning object models and an e-Learning service
infrastructure. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 4(1), 1-16.
Major, N., Ainsworth, S. & Wood. D. (1997). REDEEM: Exploiting symbiosis between
psychology and authoring environments. International Journal of Artificial
Intelligence in Education, 8, 317–340.
Murray, T., Blessing, S. & Ainsworth S. (2003). Authoring Tools for Advanced
Technology Learning Environments. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Parrish, P. E.(2004). The trouble with learning objects. Educational Technology,
Research and Development. 52(1), 49-68.
Rehak, D. (2002). CORDRA: ADL's Federated Content Repository Model. JISC/CETIS
Conference. Oxford. UK.
SCORM. (2004). Shareable Content Object Reference Model. Retrieved at 10.01.05
from http://www.adlnet.org.
Tripp, S. & Bichelmeyer, B. (1990). Rapid prototyping: An alternative instructional
design strategy. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 38, 31–44.
54
Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Martens, R. (2002). Computer-based tools for
instructional design. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 50, 5–9.
Vassileva, J. (1996). A task-centered approach for user modeling in a hypermedia
office documentation system. User Modeling and User Adapted Interaction, 6(2–3),
185–223.
Wiley, D. (2002). The Instructional Use of Learning Objects, AIT/AECT, Bloomington.
Yang, J. T. D., Chen, W. C. Tsai, C. & Chao, M. (2005). An Ontological Model for
SCORM-Compliant Authoring Tools. Journal of Information Science and Engineering,
21, 891–909.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com